超声引导下两种微创旋切术治疗非哺乳期乳腺肿块疗效比较<br />-《中国美容医学》

文章信息/Info

Title:: Comparison of Two Kinds of Ultrasound-guided Minimally Invasive Surgery in the
Treatment of Non-lactation Breast Masses

文章编号:: 1008-6455（2021）04-0095-04

作者:: 李丽燕¹; 吴金其²; 李金涛²; 刘卫新²

Author(s):: LI Li-yan1; WU Jin-qi2; LI Jin-tao2; LIU Wei-xin2

关键词:: [关键词]超声; 麦默通微创旋切术; 安珂微创旋切术; 非哺乳期乳腺肿块; 疗效

Keywords:: Key words: ultrasound-guided; mammotome minimally invasive surgery; EnCor minimally invasive surgery; non-lactationalbreast mass; curative effect

分类号:: R737.9

文献标志码:: A

摘要:: [摘要]目的：探讨非哺乳期乳腺肿块患者采用超声引导下麦默通、安珂微创旋切术的治疗效果。方法：对笔者医院2012年9
月-2019年9月收治402例非哺乳期乳腺肿块患者相关资料予以回顾性分析，依据患者手术方式将接受超声引导下麦默通以及
安珂旋切术患者分别纳入麦默通组（n =209，223个肿块）与安珂组（n =193，208个肿块）。比较两组患者符合术式标准肿块
切除率、围手术期相关指标、术后并发症发生率及术后3个月超声复查肿块残留率。结果：麦默通组、安珂组符合术式标
准肿块切除率分别为96.86%，99.52%，组间比较差异无统计学意义（P ＞0.05）。麦默通组手术持续时间、刀头更换频率
均高于安珂组，差异有统计学意义（P ＜0.05）。两组间切口长度、术中失血量、手术切口愈合时间、术后疼痛持续时间
比较差异无统计学意义（P ＞0.05）。麦默通组患者术后感染、乳房内部血肿发生率显著低于安珂组，差异有统计学意义
（P ＜0.05）；而两组间皮下瘀斑发生率比较差异无统计学意义（P ＞0.05）。手术完成后3个月超声复查两组肿块残留率比
较差异无统计学意义（1.44% vs 0.52%，P＞0.05）。结论：非哺乳期乳腺肿块患者采用超声引导下麦默通、安珂微创旋切
术进行治疗效果均显著，但安珂微创旋切术手术时间短，而麦默通微创旋切术术后并发症发生率较低，临床应用可以依据实
际情况进行选择。

Abstract:: Abstract: Objective To explore the curative effect of ultrasound-guided mammotome minimally invasive surgery and EnCor
minimally invasive surgery on non-lactational breast masses. Methods A retrospective analysis of related data of 402 patients
with non-lactational breast masses who were admitted and treated in the hospital during the period from September 2012
to September 2019 was performed. Patients treated with ultrasound-guided mammotome minimally invasive surgery were
included in the mammotome group (209 patients with 223 lumps) and those treated with EnCor minimally invasive surgery
were included in the EnCor group (193 patients with 208 lumps). The mass resection rate, perioperative related indicators,
postoperative complications and residual rate of ultrasound reexamination 3 months after operation were compared between
the two groups. Results The mass resection rates according with operation indications in the mammotome group and yhe
EnCor group were 96.86% and 99.52%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P ＞0.05).
The duration of surgery and frequency of handpiece replacement in the mammotome group were longer/higher than those in the
EnCor group, the differences were statistically significant (P ＜0.05). Differences in incision length, intraoperative blood loss,
healing time of the surgical incision or duration of postoperative pain between the two groups were not statistically significant
(P ＞0.05). The incidences of postoperative infection and intramammary hematoma in the mammotome group were significantly
lower than those in the EnCor group (P ＜0.05). But difference in the incidence of subcutaneous ecchymosis was not statistically
significant (P ＞0.05). Ultrasound reexamination results showed that difference in the rate of residual lump between the two
groups in 3 months after surgery was not statistically significant (1.44% vs 0.52%, P ＞0.05). Conclusion Both ultrasoundguided
mammotome minimally invasive surgery and EnCor minimally invasive surgery are markedly effective in treatment
of non-lactational breast lump. However, the duration of EnCor minimally invasive surgery is shorter, and the incidence of
complications after mammotome minimally invasive surgery is lower.

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

文章信息/Info

常用功能

导航/Navigate

工具/Tools

统计/Statistics