[1]谢玲玲,王爱玲,罗婧雯,等.自主式口腔种植机器人在前牙美学区单牙种植术中的应用[J].中国美容医学,2024,(10):146-149.
XIE Lingling,WANG Ailing,LUO Jingwen,et al.Application of an Autonomous Oral Implant Robot in Single-tooth Implant Surgery in Anterior Dental Aesthetic Zone[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2024,(10):146-149.
点击复制
自主式口腔种植机器人在前牙美学区单牙种植术中的应用(
)
《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]
- 卷:
-
- 期数:
-
2024年10期
- 页码:
-
146-149
- 栏目:
-
- 出版日期:
-
2024-09-26
文章信息/Info
- Title:
-
Application of an Autonomous Oral Implant Robot in Single-tooth Implant Surgery in Anterior Dental Aesthetic Zone
- 文章编号:
-
1008-6455(2024)10-0146-04
- 作者:
-
谢玲玲; 王爱玲; 罗婧雯; 张宇航; 高 敏
-
(南京医科大学附属口腔医院 江苏省口腔医院门诊手术室 江苏 南京 210029)
- Author(s):
-
XIE Lingling; WANG Ailing; LUO Jingwen; ZHANG Yuhang; GAO Min
-
( Outpatient Operating Room, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, China )
-
- 关键词:
-
口腔种植机器人; 自由手种植; 满意度; 精度; 并发症
- Keywords:
-
oral implant robot; freehand implant; satisfaction; precision; complications
- 分类号:
-
R782.12
- 文献标志码:
-
A
- 摘要:
-
目的:探析自主式口腔种植机器人与传统自由手在美学区单牙种植术中的应用效果。方法:选取2022年5月-2022 年10月笔者医院行美学区单颗牙种植手术的46例患者为研究对象,根据随机数字表法将患者分为对照组和试验组,每组 23例。对照组采用传统自由手种植方式,试验组采用自主式口腔种植机器人辅助下完成种植。观察比较两组患者手术时 长、种植体角度偏差、术后并发症发生率及患者满意度。结果:试验组手术时长(14.61±2.43)min、种植体角度偏差 (0.73±0.44)°,均优于对照组(P<0.05);试验组患者术后并发症发生率明显低于对照组(P<0.05);试验组患 者满意度97.50%,显著高于对照组的65.22%(P<0.05);两组患者术后6个月种植成功率比较,试验组高于对照组,差 异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:与传统自由手种植相比,自主式口腔种植机器人辅助美学区种植更加符合“3A2B”种 植原则,可以提高种植体植入精度,降低手术并发症发生率,缩短手术时间,获得更佳美学效果,从而提高患者满意度。
- Abstract:
-
Objective To explore the analysis of the eff ect of autonomous oral implant robot and traditional freehand in single tooth implantation in the aesthetic area. Methods Forty-six patients who performed single tooth implant surgery in the aesthetic area of the author’s department from May to November 2022 were selected as study subjects, and the patients were divided into two groups according to the random number table method, with 23 patients in each group. Patients with traditional freehand implantation method as the control group and patients who completed implantation with the assistance of the autonomous oral implant robot as the test group. The length of surgery, deviation of implant angle, incidence of postoperative complications and satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results The duration of surgery (14.61±2.43)min and the deviation of implant angle (0.73±0.44)° were better in the test group than in the control group, and the diff erence was statistically signifi cant (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications was signifi cantly lower in the test group than in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The satisfaction rate of patients in the test group (97.50%) was higher than that of the control group (65.22%), and the diff erence was statistically signifi cant (P<0.05). The diff erence was statistically signifi cant (P<0.05). The implantation success rate at 6 months after surgery was higher in the test group than in the control group in both groups. Conclusion Compared with traditional freehand implantation, the autonomous oral implant robot-assisted aesthetic zone implantation is more in line with the "3A2B" implantation principle, which can improve implant placement accuracy, reduce the incidence of surgical complications, shorten the operation time, achieve aesthetic eff ects, and thus improve patient satisfaction.
更新日期/Last Update:
2024-10-10