[1]熊亚芳,朱妮蔓. Tip-Edge Plus差动直丝弓技术和MBT直丝弓技术治疗安氏Ⅱ1错牙合畸形患者临床及美学效果比较[J].中国美容医学,2018,(07):68-71.
　XIONG Ya-fang,ZHU Ni-man. Comparison of Clinical and Aesthetic Effects of Tip-edge Plus Differential Straight Wire Technique Versus MBT Straight Wire Technique in the Treatment of Angle’s Class Ⅱ Division 1 Malocclusion[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(07):68-71.
点击复制

 Tip-Edge Plus差动直丝弓技术和MBT直丝弓技术治疗安氏Ⅱ1错牙合畸形患者临床及美学效果比较
()
分享到：

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:
期数:
2018年07期
页码:
68-71
栏目:
出版日期:
2018-08-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Comparison of Clinical and Aesthetic Effects of Tip-edge Plus Differential Straight Wire Technique Versus MBT Straight Wire Technique in the Treatment of Angle’s Class Ⅱ Division 1 Malocclusion
文章编号:
1008-6455（2018）07-0068-04
作者:
 熊亚芳;  朱妮蔓
Author(s):
 XIONG Ya-fang; ZHU Ni-man
关键词:
 ; [关键词]Tip-Edge Plus差动直丝弓技术; MBT直丝弓技术; 安氏Ⅱ1错牙合畸形; 美学效果
Keywords:
 ; Key words: Tip-Edge Plus differential straight wire technique;  MBT straight wire technique;  angle’s class Ⅱ division 1malocclusion;  aesthetic effect
分类号:
R783.5
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
[摘要]目的：探讨Tip-Edge Plus差动直丝弓技术和MBT直丝弓技术治疗安氏Ⅱ1错牙合畸形患者的临床及美学效果。方法：选
择笔者医院收治的56例安氏Ⅱ1类错牙合畸形患者为研究对象，采用随机数字表分为Tip-Edge Plus组与MBT组矫正治疗，每组
28例，于术后随访，治疗前后均进行上下颌切牙根尖片并进行根吸收评分，同时检测头影测量均值，记录两组打开咬合所需
时间及复诊次数，于最后一次随访时通过满意度评价量表评估其治疗满意度。结果：两组上下颌第一前磨牙、第二前磨牙牙
根吸收分布情况均无显著性差异（P ＞0.05）；治疗后Tip-Edge Plus组SNA（83.41±3.65）°，U1-NA（35.72±4.61）°，
MBT组依次为（81.24±4.29）°、（26.43±4.85）°，两组SNA、UI-NA较治疗前显著下降（P ＜0.05），且Tip-Edge Plus
组U1-NA显著低于MBT组（P ＜0.05），但两组SNB、L1-NB、FMA比较无显著性差异（P ＞0.05）；Tip-Edge Plus组矫治时间
（24.2±2.3）月，与MBT组（23.8±2.5）月比较，无显著性差异（P ＞0.05），但复诊次数、打开咬合时间（16.5±2.7）
次、（3.8±0.7）月均显著低于MBT组（22.3±3.8）次、（4.6±1.2）月（P ＜0.05）；Tip-Edge Plus组满意度评分
（94.6±2.3）分，与MBT组（95.2±2.4）分无显著性差异（P ＞0.05）。结论：Tip-Edge Plus差动直丝弓技术和MBT直丝弓
技术均可有效治疗安氏Ⅱ1类错牙合畸形，矫治效果基本一致，但前者可快速恢复咬合关系，减少复诊次数。

Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical and aesthetic effects of Tip-Edge Plus differential straight wire technique
versus MBT straight wire technique in the treatment of Angle’s Class II division 1 malocclusion. Methods 56 patients with
Angle’s Class Ⅱdivision 1 malocclusion in the hospital were selected as the subjects, and they were randomly divided into
Tip-Edge Plus group and MBT group by the random number table method, with 28 cases in each group. All patients were
followed up for 24 months after operation. The supramaxillary and submaxillary incisors periapical films and root resorption
scores were observed before and after treatment, and the mean value of cephalometrics was recorded. The time required
for opening occlusion and the times of subsequent visit of the two groups were recorded, and the treatment satisfaction was
assessed by the satisfaction rating scale at the last follow-up. Results There was no significant difference in root resorption of
the supramaxillary and submaxillary first premolar and the second premolar between the two groups (P ＞0.05). After treatment,
the SN plane-subspinale angle (SNA) and the angle between upper incisor to NA line (U1-NA) in Tip-Edge Plus group
[(83.41±3.65) degrees, (35.72±4.61) degrees] and MBT group [(81.24±4.29) degrees, (26.43±4.85) degrees] were decreased
significantly, compared with those before treatment (P ＜0.05), and the U1-NA in Tip-Edge Plus group was significantly lower
than that in MBT group (P ＜0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in SN plane-supramental angle
(SNB), the Angle between lower incisor to NB line (L1-NB) or the frankfort mandibular plane angle (FMA) (P ＞0.05). There
was no significant difference of orthodontic treatment time between Tip-Edge Plus group and MBT group [(24.2±2.3) months
vs (23.8±2.5) months] (P ＞0.05). However, the times of subsequent visit and the time of opening occlusion [(16.5±2.7), times,
(3.8±0.7) months] were significantly less / shorter than those of MBT group [(22.3±3.8) times, (4.6±1.2) months] (P ＜0.05).
There was no significant difference in the satisfaction score between Tip-Edge Plus group and MBT group [(94.6±2.3) vs
(95.2±2.4)] (P ＞0.05). Conclusion Both of Tip-Edge Plus differential straight wire technique and MBT straight wire technique
are effective in the treatment of Angle’s Class II division 1 malocclusion, and orthodontic effects are similar. However, the
former can quickly restore the occlusal relationship and reduce the times of subsequent visit.

相似文献/References:

[1]. 埋线美容专栏[J].中国美容医学,2018,(01):0.
　[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(07):0.
[2]杨 震. 应用透明质酸颏部填充联合A型肉毒毒素咬肌注射重塑面部下1/3轮廓的效果观察[J].中国美容医学,2018,(03):1.
　YANG Zhen. Effect of Hyaluronic Acid Chin Filling Combined with Botulinum Toxin Type A Masseter Muscle Injection to Reconstruct the Facial Contour of the Lower 1/3[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(07):1.
[3]祝闽辉,张栋梁,叶祥柏,等. 皮肤软组织扩张术埋置注液期并发症危险因素研究[J].中国美容医学,2018,(03):4.
　ZHU Min-hui,ZHANG Dong-liang,YE Xiang-bo,et al. Risk Factors of Complications after Tissue Expasion[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(07):4.
[4]刘申松,杨永成. 自体脂肪颗粒移植联合假体隆乳术在哺乳后乳腺萎缩整形术中的应用[J].中国美容医学,2018,(03):9.
　LIU Shen-song,YANG Yong-cheng. Application of Autologous Fat Granule Graft Combined with Prosthesis Combined Augmentation Mammoplasty in Breast Reconstruction of Breast Atrophy Patients after Breast-feeding[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(07):9.
[5]韩 星,胡守舵,陈晓芳,等.自体脂肪颗粒移植促进手部年轻化的临床观察[J].中国美容医学,2018,(03):12.
　HAN Xing,HU Shou-duo,CHEN Xiao-fang,et al. The Effect of Autologous Fat Grafting in Hand Rejuvenation[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(07):12.
[6]李胜旭,苏映军,杨 宽,等. 封闭负压引流技术在先天性并指分指植皮术中的应用[J].中国美容医学,2018,(03):15.
　LI Sheng-xu,SU Ying-jun,YANG Kuan,et al. Application of Vacuum Sealing Drainage for Skin Graft in Patients with Congenital Syndactyly of the Hand[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(07):15.
[7]陈 波,路 会,马 力,等. 钝针皮下层扇形注射透明质酸矫正面颊部凹陷[J].中国美容医学,2018,(03):18.
　CHEN Bo,LU Hui,MA Li,et al. Correction of Cheek Depression by Fanshaped Hyaluronic Acid Injection in Subcutaneous Layers with Blunt Needle[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(07):18.
[8]曾德斌,栗鹏程,邱勋永,等. 不同超薄游离穿支皮瓣修复手部软组织缺损效果比较[J].中国美容医学,2018,(03):21.
　ZENG De-bin,LI Peng-cheng,QIU Xun-yong,et al. Comparison on the Repair Effect of Different Ultrathin Free Perforator Flaps in the Treatment of Patients with Soft Tissue Defect of Hand[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(07):21.
[9]程 定,崔树英,郑 乐,等. 改道引流联合VSD技术修复会阴部撕裂伤的临床研究[J].中国美容医学,2018,(03):24.
　CHENG Ding,CUI Shu-ying,ZHENG Le,et al. Clinical Study on Diverted Drainage Combined with Vacuum Sealing Drainage Technique to Repair the Laceration of the Perineum[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(07):24.
[10]李云峰,吴泽勇,黄海华,等. 全厚皮片游离移植矫治儿童足背瘢痕挛缩畸形[J].中国美容医学,2018,(03):27.
　LI Yun-feng,WU Ze-yong,HUANG Hai-hua,et al. Full-thickness Skin Graft for the Treatment of Cicatricial Contracture of the Dorsum of Foot in Children[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(07):27.

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-09-07