[1]薛 妍,陈 婷,梁振耕,等. 两种国产口腔修复膜在牙种植引导骨再生中的临床对比研究[J].中国美容医学,2019,(03):125-127.
 XUE Yan,CHEN Ting,LIANG Zhen-geng,et al. Clinical Comparative Study on Two Kinds of Domestic Oral Remediation Membranesin Guided Bone Regeneration of Dental Implantation[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(03):125-127.
点击复制

 两种国产口腔修复膜在牙种植引导骨再生中的临床对比研究
()
分享到:

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:
期数:
2019年03期
页码:
125-127
栏目:
出版日期:
2019-03-11

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Clinical Comparative Study on Two Kinds of Domestic Oral Remediation Membranes
in Guided Bone Regeneration of Dental Implantation
文章编号:
1008-6455(2019)03-0125-03
作者:
薛 妍陈 婷梁振耕谢莉莉
Author(s):
XUE YanCHEN TingLIANG Zhen-gengXIE Li-li
关键词:
[关键词]牙种植引导骨再生(GBR)口腔修复膜国产成骨效果并发症
Keywords:
Key words: dental implantation guided bone regeneration(GBR) oral cavity remediation membranes domestic osteogenesiseffect complication
分类号:
R782.12
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
[摘要]目的:评价比较博特医用胶原修复膜与海奥口腔修复膜用于牙种植引导骨再生(GBR)的应用效果。方法:按照随机数
字法将2015年5月-2018年5月在笔者医院行牙种植GBR手术的240例患者分为博特组、海奥组与Bio-Gide组,每组80例,分别
采用博特医用胶原修复膜、海奥口腔修复膜与瑞士Bio-Gide可吸收生物膜行GBR手术。比较三组患者的术后并发症、水平及
垂直成骨有效率、植骨厚度及高度、成骨厚度及高度、水平及垂直骨生长效果。结果:博特组、海奥组与Bio-Gide组的术后
并发症发生率分别为3.75%、5.00%、2.50%,三组比较差异无统计学意义(P >0.05);博特组的水平成骨有效率与垂直成骨有
效率分别为95.00%、92.50%,海奥组的水平成骨有效率与垂直成骨有效率分别为97.50%、93.75%,Bio-Gide组的水平成骨有
效率与垂直成骨有效率分别为98.75%、96.25%,三组的水平及垂直成骨有效率比较,差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。三组的
植骨厚度及植骨高度比较,差异无统计学意义(P >0.05);海奥组与Bio-Gide组的成骨厚度、成骨高度、水平骨生长效果及
垂直骨生长效果均明显高于博特组(P <0.05),两组比较差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。结论:两种国产口腔修复膜用于牙种
植GBR手术的成骨有效率及术后并发症与进口修复膜均无明显差异,海奥口腔修复膜的成骨效果与Bio-Gide可吸收生物膜相
当,均明显优于博特医用胶原修复膜。

Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To evaluate the applicative effects of Bo Te medical collagen membranes and HeaL oral rehabilitation
membranes in guided bone regenerationn(GBR) of dental implantation, in order to provide reference for the promotion of
domestic rehabilitation membranes. Methods 240 patients underwent tooth implantation GBR which was divided into Bo Te
group, HeaL group and Bio-Gide group according to random number table in our hospital from 2015.5-2018.5, 80 cases in
each group. The Bo Te medical collagen membranes, HeaL oral rehabilitation membranes and Bio-Gide absorbable biofilms
were used to carry out GBR operation in three groups,respectively.The postoperative complications, horizontal and vertical
osteogenesis effective rate, thickness and height of bone graft, thickness and height of bone regenerationt, horizontal and
vertical bone growth effects were compared between three groups. Results The occurrence rate of postoperative complications
of Bo Te group, HeaL group and Bio-Gide group was 3.75%, 5.00%,2.50%, respectively, there was no statistical significance
between three groups(P >0.05). The horizontal and vertical osteogenesis effective rate of Bo Te group was 95.00%, 92.50%,
respectively, the horizontal and vertical osteogenesis effective rate of HeaL group was 97.50%, 93.75%, respectively, the
horizontal and vertical osteogenesis effective rate of Bio-Gide group was 98.75%, 96.25%,respectively,there was no statistical
significance between three groups(P >0.05).there was no statistical significance on thickness and height of bone graft between
three groups(P>0.05). The thickness and height of bone regenerationt, horizontal and vertical bone growth effect of HeaL
group and Bio-Gide group was significantly higher than that of Bo Te grou(P <0.05),there was no statistical significance
between two groups(P >0.05). Conclusion The osteogenic efficiency and postoperative complication of two kinds of domestic
oral remediation membranes in GBR operation was not significantly different from the imported remediation membrane.The
osteogenic effect of the HeaL oral rehabilitation membranes were comparable to that of Bio-Gide absorbable biofilms and all of
them were obviously superior to Bo Te medical collagen membranes.
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-04-04