[1]田 巍,田 丹,胡 芳. rhEGF 及清创术对口腔颌面部外伤患者血清 EGF 及炎症因子水平的影响[J].中国美容医学,2019,(06):105-108.
 TIAN Wei,TIAN Dan,HU Fang.Effect of Cosmetic Debridement and Suture Combined with Rhegf on Patients withOral and Maxillofacial Trauma and Its Effect on Serum Epidermal Growth Factor andInflammatory Factors[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(06):105-108.
点击复制

 rhEGF 及清创术对口腔颌面部外伤患者血清 EGF 及炎症因子水平的影响
()
分享到:

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:
期数:
2019年06期
页码:
105-108
栏目:
出版日期:
2019-06-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Cosmetic Debridement and Suture Combined with Rhegf on Patients with
Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma and Its Effect on Serum Epidermal Growth Factor and
Inflammatory Factors
文章编号:
1008-6455(2019)06-0105-03
作者:
田 巍1田 丹2胡 芳1
Author(s):
TIAN Wei1TIAN Dan2HU Fang1
关键词:
[关键词]美容清创缝合rhEGF口腔颌面部外伤血清表皮生长因子炎症因子
Keywords:
Key words: cosmetic debridement suture rhEGF oral and maxillofacial trauma serum epidermal growth factor inflammatory factor
分类号:
R782.4
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
[摘要]目的:研究美容清创缝合联合基因重组人表皮生长因子(recombinant human Epidermal Growth Factor,rhEGF)治疗
口腔颌面部外伤患者的疗效及对患者血清表皮生长因子及炎症因子的影响。方法:回顾性分析60例口腔颌面部外伤患者的
临床资料。根据其治疗方式分为观察组和对照组,每组30例。对照组:美容清创缝合术进行治疗;观察组:美容清创缝合
术加rhEGF治疗。根据两组患者的检验资料对比其血清表皮生长因子及炎症因子水平,比较治疗12个月后的瘢痕治愈效果。
结果:术前两组患者的TNF-α、IL-6、IL-1及表皮生长因子水平对比,差异无统计学意义(P >0.05),术后第2天、第5
天,观察组患者的TNF-α、IL-6及IL-1值均显著低于对照组,患者的表皮生长因子水平显著高于对照组,两组比较差异均
具有统计学意义(P <0.05);创口治愈结果显示,观察组显效18例(60.0%),对照组10例(33.3%)。观察组总有效28例
(93.3%),大于对照组的22例(73.3%)。结论:在美容清创缝合基础上加rhEGF治疗口腔颌面部外伤患者具有更好的疗
效,显著提高了患者的创口修复质量,大大减少了术后瘢痕的形成,值得临床推广使用。
Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To study the effect of cosmetic debridement and suture combined with recombinant human epidermal
growth factor (recombinant human Epidermal Growth Factor,rhEGF) on oral and maxillofacial trauma patients and the effect
on serum epidermal growth factor (EGF) and inflammatory factor (inflammatory factor) in patients with oral and maxillofacial
trauma. Methods The clinical data of 60 patients with oral and maxillofacial trauma admitted in our hospital from August
2013 to August 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into observation group (n =30) and control (n =30).
The control group was treated by cosmetic debridement and suture, and the observation group was treated with rhEGF on the
basis of the control group. The serum levels of EGF and inflammatory factors were compared between the two groups and the
healing effect of scar 12 months later. Results The results showed that there was no significant difference in the levels of IL-1
and EGF between the two groups before operation (P >0.05). The levels of TNF-α,IL-6 and IL-1 in the observation group were
significantly lower than those in the control group on the 5th day after operation, and the EGF levels in the observation group
were significantly higher than those in the control group (P <0.05). The results showed that there were 18 cases (60.0%) in the
observation group. There were 10 cases (33.3%) in the control group, and 28 cases (93.3%) in the observation group were more
effective than 22 cases (73.3%) in the control group. Conclusion On the basis of cosmetic debridement and suture, rhEGF
has a better therapeutic effect on oral and maxillofacial trauma. RhEGF can promote wound healing and is worthy of clinical
application.
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-07-04