[1]郝晨晟,刘锦波.Meek微型皮片植皮技术在成批烧伤患者救治中的临床应用[J].中国美容医学,2019,(07):85-88.
 HAO Chen-sheng,LIU Jin-bo.Clinical Application of Meek Skin Grafting in the Treatment of Batch Burns Patients[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(07):85-88.
点击复制

Meek微型皮片植皮技术在成批烧伤患者救治中的临床应用
()
分享到:

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:
期数:
2019年07期
页码:
85-88
栏目:
出版日期:
2019-07-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical Application of Meek Skin Grafting in the Treatment of Batch Burns Patients
文章编号:
1008-6455(2019)07-0085-04
作者:
郝晨晟刘锦波
Author(s):
HAO Chen-shengLIU Jin-bo
关键词:
[关键词]成批烧伤Meek植皮微粒皮移植皮片成活率创面愈合
Keywords:
Key words: batch burn Meek skin grafting micro-skin grafting skin survival rate wound healing
分类号:
R644
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
[摘要]目的:探讨Meek微型皮片植皮技术在成批烧伤救治中的临床应用。方法:2012年2月-2015年2月,选择笔者单位收治
的成批大面积深度烧伤患者64例。其中32例患者创面进行Meek微型皮片移植修复,32例患者创面进行微粒皮移植。比较两组
使用自体皮肤面积、手术时间、创面愈合时间、住院时间、术后7d移植皮片成活率及治疗2周创面完全愈合率。结果:Meek
植皮组患者使用自体皮肤面积明显小于使用微粒植皮组,术后2周创面愈合率明显高于微粒植皮组,创面愈合时间和住院天
数明显短于微粒植皮组,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05);且Meek植皮组患者创面愈合后半年瘢痕增生明显轻于微粒植皮
组,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。两组移植皮片成活率、手术时间比较差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。结论:Meek微型
皮片移植是成批救治烧伤中较为理想的皮片移植技术,能明显节省自体皮源,且缩短了创面愈合周期及住院天数,提高了创
面愈合率,值得在临床上推广应用。

Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To explore the clinical application of Meek skin grafting in the treatment of batch burns. Methods From
February 2012 to February 2015, 64 patients with extensive deep burn were selected from our hospital. Among them, 32 cases
were repaired with Meek skin graft and 32 cases were repaired with micro-skin graft. The area of autologous skin, operation
time, wound healing time, hospitalization time, survival rate of skin graft 7 days after operation and complete healing rate
of wound 2 weeks after treatment were compared between the two groups. Results The area of autologous skin in Meek
skin grafting group was significantly smaller than that in micro-skin grafting group, the wound healing rate in 2 weeks after
operation was significantly higher than that in micro-skin grafting group, the wound healing time and hospitalization days in
Meek skin grafting group were significantly shorter than those in micro-skin grafting group, the differences were statistically
significant(P <0.05). The scar hyperplasia in Meek skin grafting group was significantly lighter than that in micro-skin grafting
group half a year after wound healing(P <0.05). There was no significant difference in survival rate and operation time between
the two groups(P >0.05). Conclusion Meek skin graft is an ideal skin graft technique for mass burn treatment. It can save
autologous skin sources, shorten the healing cycle and hospitalization days, and improve the healing rate of wounds. It is worth
popularizing and applying in clinic.

相似文献/References:

[1]邓 斌,李蔓青,张拥军. Meek植皮与邮票植皮在大面积深度烧伤创面修复中的疗效比较[J].中国美容医学,2019,(07):66.
 DENG Bin,LI Man-qing,ZHANG Yong-jun. Comparison of Meek Skin-grafting with Stamp-grafting in the Repair of Large-area Deep Burn Wounds[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(07):66.
[2]许 云,程金梅,苗 佳.症状干预联合灵性照护对行异种脱细胞真皮基质联合MEEK植皮治疗的大面积烧伤患者术后恢复效果的影响研究[J].中国美容医学,2021,(12):166.
 XU Yun,CHENG Jin-mei,MIAO Jia.Effect of Symptom Intervention Combined with Spiritual Care on the Recovery Period in Patients with Heterogeneous Acellular Dermal Matrix Combined with MEEK Skin Transplantation for Extensive Burn[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2021,(07):166.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-07-25