[1] 谢宏亮,汤剑明,李坤明,等. 经颧弓下微创治疗单纯颧弓骨折的临床效果分析[J].中国美容医学,2021,(3):82-85.
　 XIE Hong-liang,TANG Jian-ming,LI Kun-ming,et al. Clinical Effects Analysis of under Zygomatic Arch Minimally Invasive Treatment ofIsolated Zygomatic Arch Fracture[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2021,(3):82-85.
点击复制

 经颧弓下微创治疗单纯颧弓骨折的临床效果分析
()
分享到：

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:
期数:
2021年3期
页码:
82-85
栏目:
出版日期:
2021-03-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Clinical Effects Analysis of under Zygomatic Arch Minimally Invasive Treatment of
Isolated Zygomatic Arch Fracture
文章编号:
1008-6455（2021）03-0082-03
作者:
 谢宏亮; 汤剑明; 李坤明; 冯 力
Author(s):
 XIE Hong-liang;  TANG Jian-ming;  LI Kun-ming;  FENG Li
关键词:
 [关键词]颧弓骨折; 张口受限; 经颧弓下微创; 口内入路; CBCT
Keywords:
 Key words: zygomatic arch fracture;  trismus;  minimally invasive under zygomatic arch;  intraoral approach;  CBCT
分类号:
R782.4
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
[摘要]目的：回顾性分析比较经颧弓下微创复位和经口内入路复位治疗单纯颧弓骨折的临床效果。方法：选取2014年1
月-2019年12月深圳市人民医院收治的80例单纯颧弓骨折患者为研究对象，采用对照分析，分为微创组和对照组，每组40
例。微创组采用经颧弓下微创复位，对照组采用经口内入路复位，术后当天复查CBCT（Cone beam CT），术后6个月随访并
复查CBCT，评估治疗效果。结果：两组术后张口受限改善程度比较无显著性差异（P ＞0.05），微创组平均住院费用、住院
时间、并发症发生率及抗菌药物使用率少于对照组，差异均有统计学意义（P ＜0.05）。微创组患者术后效果评价及患者满
意度较对照组高，有显著性差异（P ＜0.05）。结论：经颧弓下微创和口内入路复位单纯颧弓骨折均有效，但经颧弓下微创
复位更经济快捷，术后并发症少，患者满意度高，可作为治疗单纯颧弓骨折的优选方案。
Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To analyze and compare the clinical effects of minimally invasive reduction under zygomatic arch and
through intraoral approach in the treatment of isolated zygomatic arch fracture. Methods From January 2014 to December
2019, 80 patients with isolated zygomatic arch fracture admitted to shenzhen people’s hospital were selected as the study
object.Using the comparative analysis method, the patients were divided into minimally invasive group applied minimally
invasive reduction under zygomatic arch and control group adopted the intraoral approach reduction, each group included
40 cases.CBCT (Cone beam CT)images were reexamined on the day after operation and follow up 6 months after operation,
the therapeutic effects were also evaluated. Results There was no significant difference in the improvement level of trismus
after operation between two groups (P ＞0.05). The average hospitalization cost, average hospitalization time, incidence of
postoperative complications and utilization rate of antimicrobial agents in minimally invasive group were lower than those in
control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P ＜0.05).The therapeutic effect evaluation and patient satisfaction
in minimally invasive group were higher than those in control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P ＜0.05).
Conclusion Both of Minimally invasive under zygomatic arch and intraoral approach can effectively treat isolated zygomatic
arch fracture, but minimally invasive reduction under zygomatic arch is more economical and quickly, less postoperative
complications and high patient satisfaction, which can be used as an optimal treatment for isolated zygomatic arch fracture.

相似文献/References:

[1]王雪涛,李 璁,李芳凝. 截冠留根法拔除下颌阻生智齿疗效分析[J].中国美容医学,2020,(4):126.
　WANG Xue-tao,LI Cong,LI Fang-ning. Clinical Curative Effect of Coronectomy on Extracting Impacted MandibularThird Molar[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2020,(3):126.

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-04-13