[1]李有斌,丁治红,温永刚.掌背动脉岛状皮瓣与游离尺动脉腕上穿支皮瓣修复手指软组织缺损的疗效对比分析[J].中国美容医学,2022,(6):67-70.
　LI Youbin,DING Zhihong,WEN Yonggang.Comparative Analysis of Dorsal Metacarpal Artery Island Flap and Free Ulnar Artery Supracarpal Perforator Flap in the Repair of Finger Soft Tissue Defects[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2022,(6):67-70.
点击复制

掌背动脉岛状皮瓣与游离尺动脉腕上穿支皮瓣修复手指软组织缺损的疗效对比分析()
分享到：

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:
期数:
2022年6期
页码:
67-70
栏目:
出版日期:
2022-06-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparative Analysis of Dorsal Metacarpal Artery Island Flap and Free Ulnar Artery Supracarpal Perforator Flap in the Repair of Finger Soft Tissue Defects
文章编号:
1008-6455（2022）06-0067-04
作者:
李有斌; 丁治红; 温永刚
(海南中德骨科医院手足外科 海南 海口 570102)
Author(s):
LI Youbin; DING Zhihong; WEN Yonggang
(Department of Hand and Foot Surgery,Hainan Sino German Orthopedic Hospital,Haikou 570102,Hainan,China)
关键词:
软组织缺损; 手指; 掌背动脉岛状皮瓣; 游离尺动脉腕上穿支皮瓣; 缺损修复
Keywords:
softtissue defect;  fingers;  dorsal metacarpal artery island flap;  free supracarpal perforator flap of ulnar artery;  defect repair
分类号:
R622
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：比较掌背动脉岛状皮瓣与游离尺动脉腕上穿支皮瓣修复手指软组织缺损的疗效及安全性。方法：回顾性纳入2018年1月-2019年12月笔者医院收治的95例（95指）手指软组织缺损患者，按照治疗方案的不同分为A组（n=46）与B组（n=49），A组采用游离尺动脉腕上穿支皮瓣进行修复，B组采用掌背动脉岛状皮瓣进行修复。比较两组皮瓣存活及供区愈合情况、治疗效果、手功能情况及不良反应情况。结果：两组均获得随访，皮瓣均成活。A组40例供区一级愈合，6例供区再处理后愈合；B组47例供区一级愈合，2例供区再处理后愈合。B组治疗优良率明显高于A组[87.76%（43/49） vs 78.26%（36/46）]，B组手功能效果优良率明显高于A组[89.80%（44/49） vs 73.91%（34/46）]，差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。两组均没有发生明显不良反应。结论：掌背动脉岛状皮瓣对手指软组织缺损的修复效果优于游离尺动脉腕上穿支皮瓣。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of dorsal metacarpal artery island flap and free ulnar artery supracarpal perforator flap in the repair of fi nger softtissue defects. Methods 95 patients (95 fingers) with finger softtissue defect who was retrospectively included in our hospital from January 2018 to December 2019. According to different treatment regimen, they were divided into the group A (n=46) and the group B (n=49). The patients were repaired with free ulnar artery supracarpal perforator fl ap in the group A, and the patients were repaired with orsal metacarpal artery island flap in the group B. The flap survival, donor healing, therapeutic effect, hand function and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results The follow-up was obtained in both groups, and the flaps were survived. In the group A, 40 cases healed at the first level, and 6 cases healed after reprocessing. In the group B, 47 cases healed at the first level, and 2 cases healed after reprocessing. The excellent and good rate of the group B was significantly higher than that of the group A [87.76%(43/49) vs 78.26%(36/46)], the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). The excellent and good rate of hand function in the group B was significantly higher than that in the group A [89.80%(44/49) vs 73.91%(34/46), P＜0.05. There were no obvious adverse reactions in both groups. Conclusion The effect of dorsal metacarpal artery island flap in repairing finger softtissue defect is better than that of free ulnarartery supracarpal perforator flap.

相似文献/References:

[1]边 卉,程 焘. 局部修复整形在开放性骨折后软组织缺损修复中的临床应用[J].中国美容医学,2018,(04):19.
　 Clinical Value of Local Repair and Reshaping in Soft Tissue Defect of Open Fracture BIAN Hui,CHENG Tao[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(6):19.
[2]方明松,席庆春,李 旋,等.局部皮瓣在修复头面部皮肤肿瘤切除后软组织缺损中的应用探讨[J].中国美容医学,2018,(06):16.
　FANG Ming-song,XI Qing-chun,LI Xuan,et al.Application of Local Skin Flap in Repairing Soft Tissue Defects after Resection of Head and Facial Skin Tumors[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(6):16.
[3]张 军,刘晓雪.股前外侧皮瓣游离移植联合负压封闭引流技术修复下肢远端软组织缺损[J].中国美容医学,2018,(06):25.
　ZHANG Jun,LIU Xiao-xue. Effect of Femoral Anterior Lateral Flap Free Transplantation Combined with Vacuum Sealing Drainage in Repairing of Distal Soft Tissue Defect of Lower Extremity[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(6):25.
[4]周雪莲. 负压封闭引流技术修复皮肤软组织缺损难愈性创面的应用效果[J].中国美容医学,2018,(07):46.
　ZHOU Xue-lian.Clinical Study on Vacuum Sealing Drainage in Improving Wound Healing of Skin and Soft Tissue Defects[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(6):46.
[5]张 蓉,王荣耀,高 瞻. 鼻唇沟皮瓣在颌面部软组织缺损修复中的应用[J].中国美容医学,2019,(05):113.
　ZHANG Rong,WANG Rong-yao,GAO Zhan. Application of Nasolabial Flap for Repairing Maxillofacial Soft Tissue Defect[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(6):113.
[6]高 海,王望舒,温 磊,等. 局部皮瓣在头面部外伤性皮肤软组织缺损一期修复中的应用[J].中国美容医学,2019,(08):10.
　GAO Hai,WANG Wang-shu,WEN Lei,et al. The Application of Skin Flap in One Stage Repair of the Head and Face TraumaticSkin and Soft Tissue Defect[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(6):10.
[7]罗 鹏,黄智勇,周 涛. 双叶皮瓣修复鼻部软组织缺损效果探讨[J].中国美容医学,2019,(09):74.
　LUO Peng,HUANG Zhi-yong,ZHOU Tao. The Effect of Bilobed Flap in Repairing Nasal Soft Tissue Defect[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(6):74.
[8]范 辉,陈代全,伍维昌.小腿远端蒂穿支皮瓣与股前外侧游离穿支皮瓣修复足踝部软组织缺损效果比较[J].中国美容医学,2019,(10):4.
　FAN Hui,CHEN Dai-quan,WU Wei-chang. Comparison of the Effect of Leg Distal Pedicle Perforator Skin Flaps and AnterolateralThigh Free Perforator Skin Flaps in Repairing Soft Tissue Defects of Foot-ankle[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(6):4.
[9]伋 琳,周航宇,张 磊,等. 改良鼻唇沟岛状皮瓣修复口腔鳞癌切除后软组织缺损[J].中国美容医学,2019,(10):86.
　JI Lin,ZHOU Hang-yu,ZHANG Lei,et al. Application of Modified Nasolabial Island Flap in the Repair of Oral and Maxillofacial Defects[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(6):86.
[10]吴苏州,华 栋,方小魁,等. 不同皮瓣修复面部病灶切除术后软组织缺损的效果探讨[J].中国美容医学,2020,(2):41.
　WU Su-zhou,HUA Dong,FANG Xiao-kui,et al. The Effect of Different Kinds of Skin Flaps for the Repair of Soft Tissue Defect afterFacial Lesionectomy[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2020,(6):41.
[11]邓智明,郭 峰,朱文华,等. 改良第二掌骨背筋膜皮瓣修复食中指皮肤软组织缺损[J].中国美容医学,2019,(05):88.
　DENG Zhi-ming,GUO Feng,ZHU Wen-hua,et al. Effects of Modified Second Metacarpal Fasciocutaneous Flap on Repairing SoftTissue Defect in Index or Middle Fingers[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(6):88.

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-07-01