[1]潘 思,陈 寞,姜 彤.个案追踪管理模式配合回馈教育对外伤性牙缺失患者即刻种植修复效果的影响[J].中国美容医学,2024,(1):169-172.
 PAN Si,CHEN Mo,JIANG Tong.Infl uence of Case Tracking Management Model Combined with Feedback Education on Immediate Implant Repair Effect in Patients with Traumatic Tooth Loss[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2024,(1):169-172.
点击复制

个案追踪管理模式配合回馈教育对外伤性牙缺失患者即刻种植修复效果的影响()
分享到:

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:
期数:
2024年1期
页码:
169-172
栏目:
出版日期:
2024-01-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Infl uence of Case Tracking Management Model Combined with Feedback Education on Immediate Implant Repair Effect in Patients with Traumatic Tooth Loss
文章编号:
1008-6455(2024)01-0169-04
作者:
潘 思陈 寞姜 彤
(中国中医科学院望京医院口腔科 北京 100102 )
Author(s):
PAN SiCHEN MoJIANG Tong
(Department of Stomatology,Wangjing Hospital of Chinese Academy of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100102,China)
关键词:
个案追踪管理模式回馈教育外伤性牙缺失即刻种植修复效果满意度
Keywords:
case tracking management model feedback education traumatic tooth loss immediate implant repair effect satisfaction
分类号:
R473.78
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:观察个案追踪管理模式配合回馈教育对外伤性牙缺失患者即刻种植修复效果的影响。方法:选取2011年3 月-2013年3月笔者医院收治的62例外伤性牙缺失患者为研究对象,患者均接受即刻种植修复治疗,依照区组随机化分组法将 其分为对照组31例和追踪组31例。对照组实施常规护理,追踪组在对照组基础上应用个案追踪管理模式配合回馈教育。比 较修复1年后两组种植体修复效果及满意度(前牙隐形义齿修复满意度),对比随访1、3、6年后两组种植体留存率及牙美 观程度(牙美观指数)。结果:修复1年后,追踪组种植体修复效果优于对照组(P<0.05);追踪组前牙隐形义齿修复满 意度评分高于对照组(P<0.05)。随访1、3年后,两组种植体留存率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。随访6年后, 追踪组种植体留存率高于对照组(P<0.05)。随访1、3、6年后,追踪组牙美观指数评分均低于对照组(P<0.05)。结 论:个案追踪管理模式配合回馈教育能提高外伤性牙缺失患者即刻种植修复后种植体修复效果,提升修复满意度,同时还有利于种植体留存,保持牙美观,具有较高临床应用价值。
Abstract:
Objective To observe the influence of case tracking management model combined with feedback education on immediate implant repair effect and satisfaction in patients with traumatic tooth loss. Methods 62 patients with traumatic tooth loss admitted to the hospital from March 2011 to March 2013 were selected as research subjects,and they received immediate implant repair therapy. According to block randomization method,the patients were divided into control group 31 cases and tracking group 31 cases. The control group was given routine nursing,and the tracking group was given case tracking management model combined with feedback education on the basis of the control group. The implant repair eff ect and satisfaction (repair satisfaction of anterior invisible denture) after 1 year of repair and implant retention rate and dental aesthetic degree (dental aesthetic index) after 1,3 and 6 years of follow-up were compared between the two groups. Results After 1 year of repair,the implant repair eff ect in tracking group was better than that in control group (P <0.05). The scores of aspects of repair satisfaction of anterior invisible denture were higher in tracking group than those in control group (P<0.05). After 1 year and 3 years of follow-up,there was no statistical signifi cance in implant retention rate between the two groups (P >0.05). After 6 years of follow-up,the implant retention rate in tracking group was higher compared with that in control group (P <0.05). After 1,3 and 6 years of follow-up,the dental aesthetic index score in tracking group was lower than that in control group (P <0.05). Conclusion Case tracking management model combined with feedback education can improve the implant repair eff ect after immediate implant,enhance the satisfaction of repair,facilitate the implant retention and maintain the dental aesthetics in patients with traumatic tooth loss,and it has high clinical application value.
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-02-04