[1]刘 涛,李志武,丁街生,等.两种点阵激光治疗凹陷性痤疮瘢痕的疗效对比研究[J].中国美容医学,2018,(06):60-63.
 LIU Tao,LI Zhi-wu,DING Jie-sheng,et al. The Comparative Study on Two Different Fractional Laser for the Treatment of Acne Scars[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(06):60-63.
点击复制

两种点阵激光治疗凹陷性痤疮瘢痕的疗效对比研究
()
分享到:

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:
期数:
2018年06期
页码:
60-63
栏目:
出版日期:
2018-07-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
 The Comparative Study on Two Different Fractional Laser for the Treatment of Acne Scars
文章编号:
1008-6455(2018)06-0060-04
作者:
刘 涛李志武丁街生张万鹏董秀芹
Author(s):
LIU Tao LI Zhi-wu DING Jie-sheng ZHANG Wan-peng DONG Xiu-qin
关键词:
[关键词]痤疮瘢痕CO2点阵激光2 940nm点阵铒激光临床疗效并发症
Keywords:
Key words: acne scarsCO2 fractional laser fractional Erbium laser (2 940nm)clinical effects complications
分类号:
R619+.6
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
[摘要]目的:比较CO2点阵激光和2 940nm点阵铒激光治疗凹陷性痤疮瘢痕的疗效及安全性。方法:凹陷性痤疮瘢痕患者55例,
采用CO2点阵激光治疗29例,2 940nm点阵铒激光治疗26例。治疗前后使用ECCA权重评分表对治疗部位进行评分并记录不良反应
的发生率,比较两种治疗方法的疗效差异和安全性。结果:CO2点阵激光治疗组治疗前ECCA评分平均为(259.12±213.51)分,
治疗后为(152.63±168.32)分,治疗前后比较差异有统计学意义(t =2.526,P =0.014),有效率为93.1%,治愈率为58.6%;
2 940nm铒激光点阵治疗组治疗前ECCA评分平均为(223.54±235.08)分,治疗后为(139.62±130.35)分,治疗前后比较差异有
统计学意义(t=3.853,P=0.026),有效率为84.6%,治愈率为30.8%。两组治疗有效率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。CO2
点阵激光治疗组色素沉着等并发症发生率均大于2 940nm点阵铒激光治疗组。结论:两种点阵激光治疗痤疮凹陷性瘢痕均安全、
有效,CO2点阵激光更适合较粗大瘢痕的磨削,而2 940nm点阵铒激光更适合精细的瘢痕磨削且热损伤更小。

Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To compare the clinical effects and safety of acne scars treated by the CO2 fractional laser and Fractional
Erbium Laser(2 940nm), for exploring a safety, efficacy physical method. Methods Give different treatments in 5 months
to two groups of acne scars patients, respectively with the CO2 fractional laser and Fractional Erbium Laser(2 940nm).ECCA
grading scale, pain level and complications were assessed and compared. Results In the group of 29 patients with the CO2
fractional laser, total effective rate was 93.1%; in the group of 26 patients with the Fractional Erbium Laser (2 940nm),total
effective rate was 84.6%.There was not statistics difference between two groups in clinical effective rates (P >0.05).
However,the later had less complications. Conclusion Two kinds of laser therapeutic methods are safety and efficacy.

相似文献/References:

[1]逯 艳 综述,裴 洁 范月莹 贺梦男 王小兵 审校. 二氧化碳点阵激光治疗增生性瘢痕的研究进展[J].中国美容医学,2018,(12):153.
 LU Yan,PEI Jie,FAN Yue-ying,et al. Advances in the Research of Fractional CO2 Laser Treatment of Hypertrophic Scar[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(06):153.
[2]朱明明,刘科峰.Q开关755nm翠绿宝石激光与CO2点阵激光治疗脂溢性角化病疗效对比[J].中国美容医学,2019,(03):80.
 ZHU Ming-ming,LIU Ke-feng. Therapeutic Comparision between the Curative Effects of Q Switch 755nm EmeraldGreen Gem Laser and CO2 Lattice Laser in the Treatment of Seborrheic Keratosis[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(06):80.
[3] 管晓玉 纪 覃 吴 灿 综述,白 南 审校. C02点阵激光治疗皮肤创伤性瘢痕的临床应用及研究进展[J].中国美容医学,2020,(7):169.
  GUAN Xiao-yu,JI Tan,WU Can,et al. Clinical Application and Research Progress of CO2 Fractional Laser in the Treatmentof Traumatic Skin Scar:A Systematic Review of Literature[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2020,(06):169.
[4] 张 玲,张绚辉,张杨梅,等. CO2点阵激光联合曲安奈德注射液封包治疗稳定期白癜风临床疗效评价[J].中国美容医学,2020,(8):62.
  ZHANG Ling,ZHANG Xuan-hui,ZHANG Yang-mei,et al. Clinical Effi cacy Evaluation of CO2 Lattice Laser Combined with TriamcinoloneAcetonide Injection Packet in the Treatment of Vitiligo in Stable Phase[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2020,(06):62.
[5] 党 辉,彭 湃,马 瑛. CO2点阵激光联合调Q 1 064nm激光治疗创伤性文身伴增生性瘢痕疗效观察[J].中国美容医学,2020,(10):86.
  DANG Hui,PENG Pai,MA Ying. Curative Effect of CO2 Fractional Laser Combined with Q-switched 1 064nm Laser inthe Treatment of Traumatic Tattoo with Hypertrophic Scar[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2020,(06):86.
[6]刘婷婷,房 慧,万 焰. 等离子射频治疗痤疮凹陷性瘢痕临床疗效分析[J].中国美容医学,2018,(12):57.
 LIU Ting-ting,FANG Hui,WAN Yan. Clinical Effect of Plasma Radiofrequency in the Treatment of Acne Scar[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(06):57.

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-08-09