[1]邱伟芳,江飞宇,何学君.两种不同矫治器结合微种植体矫治上颌前突临床研究[J].中国美容医学,2018,(06):94-98.
　QIU Wei-fang,JIANG Fei-yu,HE Xue-jun. Clinical Study on Two Different Appliances Combined with Implant of Anchorage for Maxillary Protrusion[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(06):94-98.
点击复制

两种不同矫治器结合微种植体矫治上颌前突临床研究
()
分享到：

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:
期数:
2018年06期
页码:
94-98
栏目:
出版日期:
2018-07-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Clinical Study on Two Different Appliances Combined with Implant of Anchorage for Maxillary Protrusion
文章编号:
1008-6455（2018）06-0094-05
作者:
邱伟芳; 江飞宇; 何学君
Author(s):
QIU Wei-fang;  JIANG Fei-yu; HE Xue-jun
关键词:
[关键词]自锁托槽矫治器; 微种植体; 上颌前突
Keywords:
Key words:self-ligating;  micro-implant anchorage; protrusion
分类号:
R783.5
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
[摘要］目的：临床使用自锁托槽和直丝弓矫治器结合微种植体支抗，矫治上颌前突错牙合畸形的疗效比较。方法：选取32例
上颌前突错牙合畸形患者，分别使用自锁托槽矫治器结合微种植体支抗(实验组，16例)和传统直丝弓托槽矫治器结合微种植
体支抗(对照组，16例)。记录并分析两组患者排齐、关闭间隙和总的治疗时间；测量两组患者尖牙牙根长度和牙槽骨高度，
以及头影测量项目，并对治疗前、后的变化进行比较分析。结果：实验组总疗程平均（19.6±5.39）个月，短于对照组的
（25.7±5.76）个月, 差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)；两组尖牙牙根长度和牙槽骨高度治疗前后变化比较，差异均无统计学意
义（P ＞0.05）；32例牙弓突度均得到改善,实验组治疗后U1-SN角、U1-X(mm)、U1-Y(mm)、A-Y(mm)、UL-Y(mm)均显著低于对
照组，两组比较差异有统计学意义（P ＜0.05）。结论：自锁托槽矫治器结合微种植体支抗矫治上颌前突拔牙患者，能显著缩
短拔牙间隙关闭的时间，缩短总疗程，前牙覆牙合覆盖的变化显著，侧貌改善明显，且尖牙牙根和牙槽骨无明显吸收。

Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To study the efficacy of Self-ligating and Straight wire appliances combine with micro-implant anchorage
to treat maxillary protrusion. Methods 32 cases of maxillary protrusion patients as research subjects,were randomly divided
into the experimental group and the control group, each group contained 16 cases.The control group treated with Roth straight
wire brackets combined micro-implant anchorage;the experimental group treated with Quick brackets (made by Germony)
combine the micro-implant anchorage. Results The average duration of the treatment group was( 19.6+5.39) months; Shorter
than the control group (25.7±5.76) there was a statistical difference in the month(P ＜0.05); the canine root length and height of
alveolar bone changes in the experimental group were smaller than the control group,but the differences were not statistically
significant (P ＞0.05); 32 cases of hard and soft profile were improved,the U1-SN,U1-X(mm),U1-Y(mm),A-Y(mm),UL-Y(mm)
in the experimental group after treatment were significantly lower than the control group(P ＜0.05). Conclusion Self-ligating
appliance combine micro implant anchorage compared with roth straight wire appliance combined micro implant anchorage
can effectively shorten the tooth extraction clearance and total course oftreatment time, increases the degree of retraction front
teeth. Overbite and overjet had been changed significantly,hard and soft of profile obviously improved, and the canine root and
alveolar bone had no obvious absorption, good clinical curative effect.

相似文献/References:

[1]吴 渊,高 杨. 安氏Ⅱ类1分类患者前牙矫治过程中使用微种植体作支抗的效果研究[J].中国美容医学,2019,(11):96.
　[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(06):96.
[2] 沈 悦,曾翠敏,刘明辉,等. 安氏Ⅱ类1分类错牙合畸形患者正畸前后CBCT测量值分析[J].中国美容医学,2021,(10):129.
　 SHEN Yue,ZENG Cui-min,LIU Ming-hui,et al. Analysis of CBCT Measurements before and after Orthodontic Correction in Patientswith Class Ⅱ Division 1 Malocclusion[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2021,(06):129.
[3]韩世智,黄 欢,蒙柯帆.微种植体支抗矫治错牙合畸形的美学效果及其对牙周炎症的影响[J].中国美容医学,2022,(2):134.
　HAN Shizhi,HUANG HuanMENG Kefan.Effect of Orthodontic Micro-implant Anchorage on Cosmetic Repair of Patients with Malocclusion and Its Effect on Periodontitis[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2022,(06):134.
[4]谢 琦,陈 宇,史克佳.微种植体支抗与传统支抗对安氏Ⅱ类错牙合畸形上颌前牙内收 的临床效果评价[J].中国美容医学,2022,(6):102.
　XIE Qi,CHEN Yu,SHI Kejia.Clinical Evaluation of Microimplant Anchorage and Traditional Anchorage in Treatment of Class Malocclusion with Adduction of Maxillary Anterior Teeth[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2022,(06):102.
[5]郭陈琳,郑梦钰,胡耀政,等.正畸治疗中两种内收上前牙方式对牙齿及下颌骨垂直向位置的影响[J].中国美容医学,2023,(9):115.[doi:10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.005895]
　GUO Chenlin,ZHENG Mengyu,HU Yaozheng,et al.Vertical Position Changes of Teeth and Mandible Following Different Upper Incisors Retraction Techniques in Orthodontics Treatment[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2023,(06):115.[doi:10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.005895]

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-08-09