[1]贾希进. 牙种植体在慢性牙周炎致缺失牙修复中的应用效果[J].中国美容医学,2019,(08):116-118.
 JIA Xi-jin. Applicative Effect of Dental Implant in the Restoration of Missing Teeth Caused by Chronic Periodontitis[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(08):116-118.
点击复制

 牙种植体在慢性牙周炎致缺失牙修复中的应用效果
()
分享到:

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:
期数:
2019年08期
页码:
116-118
栏目:
出版日期:
2019-08-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Applicative Effect of Dental Implant in the Restoration of Missing Teeth Caused by Chronic Periodontitis
文章编号:
1008-6455(2019)08-0116-03
作者:
贾希进
Author(s):
JIA Xi-jin
关键词:
[关键词]慢性牙周炎缺失牙牙种植体固定式种植义齿可摘式覆盖种植义齿
Keywords:
Key words: chronic periodontitis missing teeth dental implant fixed implant supported denture covered implant supporteddenture
分类号:
R781.4+2
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
[摘要]目的:探讨牙种植体在慢性牙周炎致缺失牙修复中的应用效果。方法:按照随机数字法将2015年1月-2017年1月在笔
者医院口腔科进行治疗的60例慢性牙周炎致缺失牙患者分为两组。固定式义齿组:31例,采用固定式种植义齿修复;覆盖式
义齿组:29例,采用可摘式覆盖种植义齿修复。比较两组患者修复6、12个月的种植成功率,修复后12个月,采用调查问
卷量表对两组的美观程度、咀嚼功能、维护便利程度、成本费用及治疗时间进行评分。结果:修复6个月后,固定式义齿
组与覆盖式义齿组的种植成功率分别为90.32%、89.66%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P >0.05);修复12个月后,固定式
义齿组与覆盖式义齿组的种植成功率分别为87.10%、86.21%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。修复12个月后,两
组美观程度[(2.13±0.80)vs(2.20±0.72)]、维护便利程度[(2.53±0.69)vs(2.61±0.73)]的量表评分比较,差异无统计学
意义(P >0.05),固定式义齿组的咀嚼功能评分[(1.02±0.42)vs(2.08±0.83)]明显低于覆盖式义齿组(P <0.05),成本费用
[(2.98±0.55)vs(2.01±0.34)]与治疗时间[(2.67±0.61)vs(1.99±0.57)]的评分明显高于覆盖式义齿组,两组比较差异有
统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论:牙种植体在慢性牙周炎致缺失牙中的修复效果明显,患者可以根据经济状态及需求,选择不
同的修复方式。

Abstract:

(Department of Stomatology, Beijing Changping Hospital, Beijing 101400, China)
Abstract: Objective To discuss the effect of dental implant in the restoration of missing teeth caused by chronic periodontitis.
Methods According to the random number method, 60 patients with missing teeth caused by chronic periodontitis which
was divided into fixed denture group (n =31) and overdenture group (n =29) in our hospital from January 2015 to January
2017. The patients were restored by fixed denture supported with implant were fixed restoration group and by overdentures
supported with implants were in overdenture group. The success rate of implantation was compared between two groups at 6
and 12 months after restoration. Aesthetic appearance, chewing function, maintenance convenience, cost and treatment time
were scored by questionnaire in two groups at 12 months after restoration. Results 6 months after restoration, the success
rate of implantation of fixed denture group and overdenture group was 90.32% and 89.66%, respectively and there was no
significant difference between two groups (P >0.05). 12 months after restoration, the success rate of implantation of fixed
denture group and overdenture group was 87.10%(27/31) and 86.21%, respectively and there was no significant difference
between two groups (P >0.05). 12 months after restoration, there was no significant difference on scores of aesthetic
appearance[(2.13±0.80) vs (2.20±0.72)], maintenance convenience[(2.53±0.69) vs (2.61±0.73)] between two groups (P >
0.05). The scores of chewing function[(1.02±0.42) vs (2.08±0.83)of fixed denture group was significantly higher than that of
overdenture group(P <0.05), the scores of cost[(2.98±0.55) vs (2.01±0.34)]and treatment time[(2.67±0.61) vs (1.99±0.57)]
of fixed denture group was significantly lower than that of overdenture group(P <0.05). Conclusion The repair effect was
obvious of dental implant on teeth caused by chronic periodontitis and the patients could select different repair methods
according to economic status and demand.

相似文献/References:

[1]张 燕,李 恺,李 芳,等. T-scan联合生物学标志对牙周炎患牙固定义齿修复的评价[J].中国美容医学,2019,(05):125.
 ZHANG Yan,LI Kai,LI Fang,et al. Evaluation of Fixed Partial Dentures for Patients with Compromised PeriodontalCondition Using T-scan and Biologic Marker[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(08):125.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-09-03