[1]杨 霜,赵 璇.腹部加压结合皮下美容缝合技术在瘢痕体质产妇剖宫产术中的应用[J].中国美容医学,2019,(10):24-26.
 YANG Shuang,ZHAO Xuan. Application of Abdominal Pressure Combined with Subcutaneous Aesthetic Suturein Cesarean Section Women with Scar Constitution[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(10):24-26.
点击复制

腹部加压结合皮下美容缝合技术在瘢痕体质产妇剖宫产术中的应用
()
分享到:

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:
期数:
2019年10期
页码:
24-26
栏目:
出版日期:
2019-10-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Application of Abdominal Pressure Combined with Subcutaneous Aesthetic Suture
in Cesarean Section Women with Scar Constitution
文章编号:
1008-6455(2019)10-0024-03
作者:
杨 霜1赵 璇2
Author(s):
YANG Shuang1ZHAO Xuan2
关键词:
[关键词]腹部加压皮下美容缝合技术瘢痕体质二次剖宫产
Keywords:
Key words: abdominal pressure subcutaneous cosmetic suture technology scar constitution second cesarean section
分类号:
R622
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
[摘要]目的:探讨腹部加压结合皮下美容缝合技术在瘢痕体质产妇剖宫产术中的应用效果。方法:选择2017年2月-2018年2
月笔者医院收治的行第二次剖宫产且属于瘢痕体质的70例产妇作为本次的研究对象。按照随机数表法分为观察组与对照组。
对照组给予传统妇产科腹部单纯间断缝合法进行缝合。观察组给予腹部加压结合皮下美容缝合技术。对两组的治疗效果、产
妇术后外观满意度以及不良反应发生情况进行比较。结果:观察组术后脂肪液化、切口感染、切口疝、切口水肿以及切口裂
开等不良反应发生率为2.70%,明显低于对照组的21.21%,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。观察组治疗有效率为97.30%高于
对照组的81.82%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组产妇对外观满意度为97.30%明显优于对照组的75.76%,差异有统
计学意义(P <0.05)。结论:腹部加压结合皮下美容缝合术在治疗瘢痕体质剖宫产产妇中有良好的治疗效果,能显著改善
产妇术后外观,达到理想的美容效果。

Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To study the application effect of abdominal pressure combined with subcutaneous aesthetic suture in
cesarean section women with scar constitution. Methods Seventy pregnant women with scar constitution who underwent
second cesarean section in our hospital from February 2017 to February 2018 were selected as the subjects of this study. All
patients were divided into the observation group and the control group according to random number table method. The patients
in the control group were treated with traditional interrupted suture technique of abdominal incision suture in gynecology and
obstetrics. The patients in the observation group were sutured by abdominal pressure combined with subcutaneous aesthetic
suture. The therapeutic effect, postoperative appearance satisfaction and adverse reactions of the two groups were analyzed
and compared. Results The incidence of adverse reactions such as fat liquefaction, incision infection, incision hernia, incision
edema and incision dehiscence in the observation group was 2.70%, which was significantly lower than that in the control group
(21.21%), the difference was statistically significant(P <0.05). The effective rate of observation group was 97.30% higher than
that of control group (81.82%, P<0.05). The maternal satisfaction with appearance in the observation group was 97.30%, which
was significantly better than that in the control group (75.76%, P <0.05). Conclusion Abdominal compression combined with
subcutaneous suture has a good therapeutic effect in the treatment of cesarean section women with scar constitution. Abdominal
compression combined with subcutaneous suture can significantly improve the appearance of patients after operation and
achieve ideal cosmetic effect.
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-11-05