[1]高 扬,石玉琦,杨兴春,等. 膨体聚四氟乙烯与硅胶假体隆鼻效果比较[J].中国美容医学,2019,(12):39-42.
　GAO Yang,SHI Yu-qi,YANG Xing-chun,et al. Comparison of Augmentation Rhinoplasty Effect between ExpandedPolytetrafluoroethylene and Silicone Prosthesis[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(12):39-42.
点击复制

 膨体聚四氟乙烯与硅胶假体隆鼻效果比较
()
分享到：

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:
期数:
2019年12期
页码:
39-42
栏目:
出版日期:
2019-12-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Comparison of Augmentation Rhinoplasty Effect between Expanded
Polytetrafluoroethylene and Silicone Prosthesis
文章编号:
1008-6455（2019）12-0039-03
作者:
 高 扬; 石玉琦; 杨兴春; 邱 磊; 杨 芷
Author(s):
 GAO Yang; SHI Yu-qi; YANG Xing-chun; QIU Lei; YANG Zhi
关键词:
 ; [关键词]鼻整形; 膨体聚四氟乙烯; 硅胶假体; 鼻形; 并发症
Keywords:
 ; key words: augmentation rhinoplasty;  expanded polytetrafluoroethylene;  silicone prosthesis;  nasal shape;  complication
分类号:
R622
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
[摘要]目的：比较膨体聚四氟乙烯与硅胶假体隆鼻的临床效果。方法：选取2016年6月-2018年6月重庆医科大学附属第三医
院（捷尔医院）整形外科收治的60例鼻整形患者为研究对象，膨体聚四氟乙烯隆鼻患者30例为研究组，硅胶假体隆鼻患者30
例为对照组。记录术后3个月和12个月鼻根高、鼻面角、鼻额角、鼻尖角等；统计术后并发症的发生情况及患者满意度。结
果：对照组术后12个月鼻根高、鼻面角、鼻尖角较术后3个月显著降低，差异有统计学意义（P ＜0.05），鼻额角与术后3个
月比较差异无统计学意义（P ＞0.05）；研究组术后12个月鼻根高、鼻面角、鼻额角、鼻尖角与术后3个月比较,差异无统计
学意义（P ＞0.05）；且研究组术后12个月鼻根高、鼻面角、鼻尖角显著高于对照组（P ＜0.05)，鼻额角与对照组比较差异
无统计学意义（P ＞0.05）。研究组并发症总发生率为6.66%显著低于对照组的33.33%，且研究组患者满意度为90.00%显著高
于的对照组53.33%，差异有统计学意义（P ＜0.05）。结论：膨体聚四氟乙烯隆鼻效果优于硅胶假体。

Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To compare of the clinical effect of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and silicone prosthesis in
augmentation rhinoplasty. Methods From June 2016 to June 2018, 60 cases of rhinoplasty patients were treated in the
plastic surgery department of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (Jieer Hospital). 30 patients
with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene were in the study group and 30 patients with silicone prosthesis were in the control
group. The nasal root height, nasofacial angle, nasofacial angle, nasofacial angle and nasal tip angle were recorded at 3 and
12 months after operation, and the incidence of complications and patients’ satisfaction were counted. Results In the control
group, 12 months postoperatively, the nasal root height, nasal facial angle and nasal tip angle were significantly lower than 3
months postoperatively(P ＜0.05), and there was no significant difference between the nasal frontal angle and the postoperative
3 months(P ＞0.05). In the study group, 12 months postoperatively, there was no significant difference in the height of the
nasal root, the angle of the nose surface, the angle of the nose frontal and the angle of the nose tip compared with 3 months
postoperatively(P ＞0.05). 12 months after operation, the height of nasal root, the angle of nasal surface and the angle of
nasal tip in the study group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P ＜0.05), and there was no significant
difference between the nasal frontal angle and the control group(P ＞0.05). The total incidence of complications in the study
group was 6.66%, which was significantly lower than that in the control group (33.33%, P ＜0.05). The patients’ satisfaction in
the study group was 90.00%, which was significantly higher than that in the control group(53.33%, P ＜0.05). Conclusion The
augmentation rhinoplasty effect of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene is better than that of silicone prosthesis.

相似文献/References:

[1]. 埋线美容专栏[J].中国美容医学,2018,(01):0.
　[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(12):0.
[2]杨 震. 应用透明质酸颏部填充联合A型肉毒毒素咬肌注射重塑面部下1/3轮廓的效果观察[J].中国美容医学,2018,(03):1.
　YANG Zhen. Effect of Hyaluronic Acid Chin Filling Combined with Botulinum Toxin Type A Masseter Muscle Injection to Reconstruct the Facial Contour of the Lower 1/3[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(12):1.
[3]祝闽辉,张栋梁,叶祥柏,等. 皮肤软组织扩张术埋置注液期并发症危险因素研究[J].中国美容医学,2018,(03):4.
　ZHU Min-hui,ZHANG Dong-liang,YE Xiang-bo,et al. Risk Factors of Complications after Tissue Expasion[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(12):4.
[4]刘申松,杨永成. 自体脂肪颗粒移植联合假体隆乳术在哺乳后乳腺萎缩整形术中的应用[J].中国美容医学,2018,(03):9.
　LIU Shen-song,YANG Yong-cheng. Application of Autologous Fat Granule Graft Combined with Prosthesis Combined Augmentation Mammoplasty in Breast Reconstruction of Breast Atrophy Patients after Breast-feeding[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(12):9.
[5]韩 星,胡守舵,陈晓芳,等.自体脂肪颗粒移植促进手部年轻化的临床观察[J].中国美容医学,2018,(03):12.
　HAN Xing,HU Shou-duo,CHEN Xiao-fang,et al. The Effect of Autologous Fat Grafting in Hand Rejuvenation[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(12):12.
[6]李胜旭,苏映军,杨 宽,等. 封闭负压引流技术在先天性并指分指植皮术中的应用[J].中国美容医学,2018,(03):15.
　LI Sheng-xu,SU Ying-jun,YANG Kuan,et al. Application of Vacuum Sealing Drainage for Skin Graft in Patients with Congenital Syndactyly of the Hand[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(12):15.
[7]陈 波,路 会,马 力,等. 钝针皮下层扇形注射透明质酸矫正面颊部凹陷[J].中国美容医学,2018,(03):18.
　CHEN Bo,LU Hui,MA Li,et al. Correction of Cheek Depression by Fanshaped Hyaluronic Acid Injection in Subcutaneous Layers with Blunt Needle[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(12):18.
[8]曾德斌,栗鹏程,邱勋永,等. 不同超薄游离穿支皮瓣修复手部软组织缺损效果比较[J].中国美容医学,2018,(03):21.
　ZENG De-bin,LI Peng-cheng,QIU Xun-yong,et al. Comparison on the Repair Effect of Different Ultrathin Free Perforator Flaps in the Treatment of Patients with Soft Tissue Defect of Hand[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(12):21.
[9]程 定,崔树英,郑 乐,等. 改道引流联合VSD技术修复会阴部撕裂伤的临床研究[J].中国美容医学,2018,(03):24.
　CHENG Ding,CUI Shu-ying,ZHENG Le,et al. Clinical Study on Diverted Drainage Combined with Vacuum Sealing Drainage Technique to Repair the Laceration of the Perineum[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(12):24.
[10]李云峰,吴泽勇,黄海华,等. 全厚皮片游离移植矫治儿童足背瘢痕挛缩畸形[J].中国美容医学,2018,(03):27.
　LI Yun-feng,WU Ze-yong,HUANG Hai-hua,et al. Full-thickness Skin Graft for the Treatment of Cicatricial Contracture of the Dorsum of Foot in Children[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(12):27.
[11]杨 成,李正勇,刘睿奇. 肋软骨与耳软骨联合硅胶假体隆鼻效果比较[J].中国美容医学,2020,(4):28.
　YANG Cheng,LI Zheng-yong,LIU Rui-qi.Comparison of Clinical Effects of Costal Cartilage and Auricular Cartilage Combinedwith Silicone Prosthesis in Rhinoplasty[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2020,(12):28.

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-01-06