«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:

期数:

2020年7期

页码:

145-147

栏目:

出版日期:

2020-07-10

文章信息/Info

Title:

 Application Value of 3D Printing Technology in Implant Patients

文章编号:

1008-6455（2020）07-0145-03

作者:

 张秀琴; 刘振华; 周俊宏

Author(s):

 ZHANG Xiu-qin;  LIU Zhen-hua;  ZHOU Jun-hong

关键词:

 [关键词]3D打印; 种植牙; 建模; 导板; 应用价值

Keywords:

 Key words:3D printing;  dental implant;  modeling;  guide plate;  application value

分类号:

R782.12

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

[摘要]目的：探究3D打印技术在种植牙患者中的应用。方法：研究对象选取笔者医院2017年1月-2018年12月收治的42例种植
牙患者，共计128颗牙，使用随机数字表法将其分为常规组（20例，64颗牙）及3D组（22例，64颗牙），常规组使用传统种
植牙技术进行手术，3D组使用3D打印种植导板进行手术。比较两组术后种植牙偏离距离、偏离角度，患者治疗前后咀嚼功
能、成功率及满意度。结果：两组治疗前咬合力及咀嚼效率无显著性差异（P ＞0.05）。3D组术后种植牙颈部及尖部各
方向偏离距离、近远中向及颊舌向偏离角度显著低于常规组（P ＜0.05）；治疗后3D组咬合力及咀嚼效率显著优于常规
组（P ＜0.05）；3D组修复成功62颗（成功率96.88%），常规组修复成功54颗（成功率84.38%），3D组明显高于常规组
（P ＜0.05）；3D组满意度为94.45%，常规组为85.00%，3D组显著高于常规组（P ＜0.05）。结论：3D打印技术能有效降低
种植牙患者种植体偏移，提高手术精度，提高患者咀嚼功能，改善患者满意度及种植成功率，具有临床推广意义。

Abstract:

Abstract: Objective To explore the application value of 3D printing technology in implant patients. Methods A total of 42
dental implant patients with 128 teeth enrolled in our hospital from January 2017 to December 2018 were randomly divided
into two groups (20 cases, 64 teeth) and 3D. Group (22 cases, 64 teeth).The conventional group used traditional implant
technique for surgery, and the 3d group used 3d printed implant guides for surgery. The deviation distance and deviation angle
of postoperative implants were compared between the two groups. The chewing function and success rate and satisfaction of
patients before and after treatment were compared. Results There was no signifi cant difference in the bite force and chewing
effi ciency between the two groups before treatment (P ＞0.05).In the 3D group, the deviation distance, the near-distal and the
direction of the cheek and the tongue were signifi cantly lower than that of the conventional group. The occlusal force and
chewing effi ciency of the 3D group were signifi cantly better than those of the conventional group (P ＜0.05). In the 3d
group, 62 teeth were successfully repaired (96.88%), while in the conventional group, 54 teeth were successfully repaired
(84.38%). The success rate of the 3D group was significantly higher than that of the conventional group (P ＜0.05).
The 3D satisfaction was 94.45% and 85.00% in the conventional group, and the 3D group was signifi cantly higher than the
conventional group (P ＜0.05). Conclusion 3D printing technology can effectively reduce the implant cost of implant patients,
improve the accuracy of surgery, improve the chewing function of patients, improve patient satisfaction and success rate of
planting, and has clinical signifi cance.

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-07-22