[1] 卢惠冰,徐雄均,杨伟湘,等. 全瓷髓腔固位冠与全冠修复根管治疗后牙的临床疗效对比分析[J].中国美容医学,2020,(8):134-138.
  LU Hui-bing,XU Xiong-jun,YANG Wei-xiang,et al. Clinical Controlled Trials on Endodontic Treated Posterior Teeth Restored with AllceramicEndocrown and Full Crown[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2020,(8):134-138.
点击复制

 全瓷髓腔固位冠与全冠修复根管治疗后牙的临床疗效对比分析
()
分享到:

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:
期数:
2020年8期
页码:
134-138
栏目:
出版日期:
2020-08-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Clinical Controlled Trials on Endodontic Treated Posterior Teeth Restored with Allceramic
Endocrown and Full Crown
文章编号:
1008-6455(2020)08-0134-04
作者:
 卢惠冰1徐雄均2杨伟湘1洪楠锐1
Author(s):
 LU Hui-bing1XU Xiong-jun2YANG Wei-xiang1HONG Nan-rui1
关键词:
 [关键词]全瓷髓腔固位冠全冠根管治疗髓超嵌体
Keywords:
 Key words: all-ceramic endocrown full crown endodontic treated teethendo-overlay
分类号:
R783.4
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
[摘要]目的:对比全瓷髓腔固位冠与全冠修复根管治疗后牙的临床疗效。方法:选择98例患者(108颗牙)根管治疗后的后
牙为研究对象,根据修复方式不同分为髓腔固位冠组和全冠组,髓腔固位冠组根据其覆盖牙尖部分与剩余牙体对接方式不同
分为对接型和包绕型,分别进行相应治疗修复。1年及3年后随访观察,对比其疗效和成功率,并对并发症进行分析。结果:
根据改良USPHS评价标准,1年及3年随访时各组临床疗效评价对比差异均无统计学意义(P >0.05);3年随访后各组成功率
对比差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。结论:对于根管治疗后牙齿的修复,髓腔固位冠与全冠修复在短期内均可取得显著疗
效,髓腔固位冠中牙体的包绕型预备比对接型预备更有利于修复体的固位。

Abstract:
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical effect of endodontic treated posterior teeth restored with all-ceramic endocrown
and full crown. Methods 98 patients with 108 endodontic treated posterior teeth were enrolled in this clinical study and were
divided into two groups according to the restorative method:endocrown group and full crown group. The endocrown group
were divided into two types according to teeth preparation method:butt-joint type and surround type.The follow up time was 1 year
and 3 years later. The clinical effect and the success rates were compared. Results According to the USPHS Standard,there were no
statistically signifi cance found at the 1 year and 3 years follow up between the groups for the clinical effet(P>0.05),and there were
no statistically signifi cance found at 3 years follow up between the groups for the success rates(P >0.05). Conclusion Allceramic
endocrown and full crown all have good effect for restorating the endodontic treated posterior teeth. The surround type
preparation have contribute to the retention more than the butt-joint type preparation in endocrown.

相似文献/References:

[1]张 英,熊 璟,李永强,等. 垫底材料厚度对髓腔固位冠修复后牙体组织应力影响的三维有限元分析[J].中国美容医学,2019,(09):102.
 ZHANG Ying,XIONG Jing,LI Yong-qiang,et al. Three-dimensional-finite-element Comparative Research of Different CementThickness in Endodontically Treated Mandibular Molar Restored with EndocrownRestorations[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(8):102.
[2] 何 娟,李 鹏. 两种修复方式对磨牙根管治疗后牙体大面积缺损患者修复效果的影响[J].中国美容医学,2020,(9):148.
  HE Juan,LI Peng. Influence of Two Repair Methods on the Repair Effects of Patients with Massive ToothDefects after Molar Root Canal Therapy[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2020,(8):148.

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-09-01