[1] 辛 策,宋 镇,纪彩娜,等. 颧牙种植钉和口外弓联合横腭杆治疗高角骨性Ⅱ类前突型错牙合畸形效果比较分析[J].中国美容医学,2021,(2):123-125.
　 XIN Ce,SONG Zhen,JI Cai-na,et al. Comparison of the Effect of Dental Implants, External Arch and Transverse Iliac Creston the Treatment of High Angle Skeletal Class Ⅱ Anterior Malformation[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2021,(2):123-125.
点击复制

 颧牙种植钉和口外弓联合横腭杆治疗高角骨性Ⅱ类前突型错牙合畸形效果比
较分析
()
分享到：

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:
期数:
2021年2期
页码:
123-125
栏目:
出版日期:
2021-02-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Comparison of the Effect of Dental Implants, External Arch and Transverse Iliac Crest
on the Treatment of High Angle Skeletal Class Ⅱ Anterior Malformation
文章编号:
1008-6455(2021)02-0123-03
作者:
 辛 策; 宋 镇; 纪彩娜; 丁 博
Author(s):
 XIN Ce;  SONG Zhen;  JI Cai-na;  DING Bo
关键词:
 [关键词]颧牙种植钉; 口外弓; 横腭杆; 高角骨性Ⅱ类前突型错牙合畸形; 垂直效果
Keywords:
 Key words: dental implants;  extraoral arch;  transverse mast;  high angle skeletal Class Ⅱ anterior fault occlusion malformation; vertical effect
分类号:
R783.5
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
[摘要]目的：探讨颧牙种植钉与口外弓联合横腭杆治疗骨性Ⅱ类高角前突型错牙合畸形的垂直效果。方法：选择2018年1
月-2019年1月笔者科室收治的64例骨性Ⅱ类高角前突型错牙合畸形患者，依照随机分组原则将患者分为对照组与研究组，每
组32例。研究组采用颧牙种植钉进行治疗，对照组采用口外弓联合横腭杆治疗，对比两组患者临床治疗效果。结果：研究组
患者的临床疗效优于对照组（P ＜0.05）；并发症发生率对比，研究组显著小于对照组（P ＜0.05）；研究组矫正后面部垂直
效果显著高于对照组（P ＜0.05）。结论：颧牙种植钉治疗高角骨性Ⅱ类前突型错牙合畸形效果显著，治疗后患者侧面改善显
著，矫治畸形垂直效果显著。

Abstract:
Abstract:Objective To compare the effect of dental implants and extraoral arches combined with transverse iliac crests in the
treatment of skeletal Class Ⅱ high-angle anterior malformation. Methods A total of 64 patients with skeletal Class Ⅱ highangle
anterior occlusion malocclusion were enrolled in our department from January 2018 to January 2019. Patients were
divided into control group and study group according to the principle of randomization. In each group of 32 patients, the study
group was treated with dental implants and the control group was treated with extraoral arch and transverse mast. The clinical
effects of the two groups were compared. Results The clinical treatment effect of the study group was better than that of the
control group (P ＜0.05). The complication rate was significantly lower in the study group than in the control group (P ＜0.05).
The vertical effect of the correction group in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P ＜0.05).
Conclusion The treatment of high-angle skeletal class Ⅱ anterior malformation is significant in the treatment of high-angle
skeletal type Ⅱ anterior malformation. The lateral improvement of the patient is significant after treatment.

相似文献/References:

[1] 沈 悦,曾翠敏,刘明辉,等. 微型种植体支抗在青年安氏Ⅱ类1分类错牙合畸形矫治中的应用[J].中国美容医学,2021,(7):139.
　 SHEN Yue,ZENG Cui-min,LIU Ming-hui,et al. Application and Effect of Mini Implant Anchorage in the Treatment of Class ⅡDivision 1 Malocclusion in Young People[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2021,(2):139.
[2] 尹伟娇,杜 静,邢雅芹,等. 口腔正畸治疗中微种植体支抗的临床效果分析[J].中国美容医学,2021,(10):125.
　 YIN Wei-jiao,DU Jing,XING Ya-qin,et al. Clinical Effect Analysis of Microimplant Anchorage in Orthodontic Treatment[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2021,(2):125.
[3]韩世智,黄 欢,蒙柯帆.微种植体支抗矫治错牙合畸形的美学效果及其对牙周炎症的影响[J].中国美容医学,2022,(2):134.
　HAN Shizhi,HUANG HuanMENG Kefan.Effect of Orthodontic Micro-implant Anchorage on Cosmetic Repair of Patients with Malocclusion and Its Effect on Periodontitis[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2022,(2):134.

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-03-09