[1]王晓琳,凌 兆,韩天媛,等.面部生长型对侧貌唇突度的影响[J].中国美容医学,2022,(9):74-79.
　WANG Xiaolin,LING Zhao,HAN Tianyuan,et al.The Influence of Facial Growth Pattern on Lip Protrusion in Profile[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2022,(9):74-79.
点击复制

面部生长型对侧貌唇突度的影响()
分享到：

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:
期数:
2022年9期
页码:
74-79
栏目:
出版日期:
2022-09-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Influence of Facial Growth Pattern on Lip Protrusion in Profile
文章编号:
1008-6455（2022）09-0074-05
作者:
王晓琳;  凌 兆; 韩天媛; 闫伟军; 陈 萌; 邵 玶
(哈尔滨医科大学附属口腔医院正畸科 黑龙江 哈尔滨 150001)
Author(s):
WANG Xiaolin;  LING Zhao;  HAN Tianyuan;  YAN Weijun;  CHEN Meng;  SHAO Ping
(Department of Orthodontics, Stomatological Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150001, Heilongjiang, China)
关键词:
面部生长型; 矢状骨面型; 唇突度; 软组织侧貌; 三维美学
Keywords:
facial growth type;  sagittal bone facial type;  lipprotrusion;  soft tissue profile;  three-dimensional aesthetics
分类号:
R782.2
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：研究面部生长型对美观侧貌唇突度的三维审美评价的影响，并分析其结果是否在正畸医生和非专业人士之间有所不同。方法：选取一名面部协调美观且面部软硬组织各测量值均在Holdaway软组织分析法正常值范围内的成年女性志愿者，拍摄正侧位照片导入3D MAX软件制成三维头部模型，改变面型及唇突度后生成45个三维头模。选取正畸医生和非专业人员根据Likert量表对其进行评分。结果：两组评价者对平均生长型-矢状向正常骨面型的模型评分较高（P＜0.05），对于其他骨性不协调评价较低，其中在平均生长型-下颌前突，垂直生长型-矢状向正常、垂直生长型-下颌前突，水平生长型下颌前突中，较突出的唇部位置（+2 mm）评分较高（P＜0.05），而平均生长型-下颌后缩，垂直生长型-下颌后缩，水平生长型-下颌后缩，稍微后缩的唇部位置(-2 mm)评分较高(P＜0.05）。不同面部生长型对于不同矢状骨面型唇部位置改变量为(-4 mm)、(-2 mm)、(0 mm)、(+2 mm)、(+4 mm)时的评价均呈现显著性差异，具有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论：美观侧貌的唇部位置不仅受到矢状向面部类型的影响，还受到面部生长型的影响。口腔正畸医生和非专业人士审美敏感性不同，审美趋势大致一致，专业人士较苛刻。
Abstract:
Objective To study the influence of facial growth pattern on the three-dimensional aesthetic evaluation of lip protrusion in the aesthetic profile, and to clarify whether the results are different between orthodontists and non-professionals. Methods An adult patient with coordinated and beautiful face conforming to the Holdaway soft tissue analysis method was selected, and the frontal, lateral, and 45° images were taken. The 3D MAX software was used to make a three-dimensional head model according to the facial shape, and 45 different subjects were processed. The three-dimensional images were divided into three groups according to facial growth type, and 30 orthodontists and 40 non-professionals were selected to score the randomly arranged head models. Results The evaluators of the two groups scored higher on the average growth typesagittal normal (P＜0.05), and lower evaluations on the other skeletal incoordinations. Among them, the average growth typemandibular protrusion and the vertical growth type-sagittal Normal, vertical growth type-mandibular protrusion, horizontal growth type-mandibular protrusion, the more prominent lip position (+2 mm) scores higher (P＜0.05), and the average growth type-mandibular recession, vertical growth type-Mandibular retraction, horizontal growth type-Mandibular retraction, slightly retracted lip position (-2 mm) score higher (P＜0.05).Different facial growth types have significant differences in the evaluation of the lip position changes of (-4 mm), (-2 mm), (0 mm), (+2 mm), (+4 mm) for different sagittal bone facial types (P＜0.05). Conclusion The lip position of the beautiful profile is not only affected by the sagittal face type, but also by the facial growth type. Orthodontic doctors and non-professionals have different aesthetic sensitivities, and their aesthetic trends are roughly the same. Professionals are more demanding

相似文献/References:

[1]孙 昊,马新芳,康卫民,等.新疆维吾尔族成人骨性Ⅱ类错牙合不同垂直骨面型下颌联合形态的研究[J].中国美容医学,2022,(4):90.
　SUN Hao,MA Xinfang,KANG Weimin,et al.Symphysis Morphology and the Inclination of Lower Incisor in Xinjiang Uygur Adults with Sketelal Class Malocclusion[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2022,(9):90.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：哈医大一院科研创新基金（编号：2019M04）
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-09-21