«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:

期数:

2024年1期

页码:

153-156

栏目:

出版日期:

2024-01-10

文章信息/Info

Title:

Comparison of the Effect of Indirect Method Geramage Polymerized Porcelain Veneer and Direct Method Photocurable Resin Restoration in Patients with Vital Pulp Anterior Teeth

文章编号:

1008-6455（2024）01-0153-04

作者:

万志刚¹ ; 代 汪¹ ; 毛 敏²

(1.监利市人民医院口腔科 湖北 荆州 433300 ;2.湖北医药学院附属太和医院口腔科 湖北 十堰 442000 )

Author(s):

WAN Zhigang¹ ; DAI Wang¹ ; MAO Min²

(1.Department of Stomatology,Jianli People’s Hospital,Jingzhou 433300,Hubei,China; 2.Department of Stomatology,Taihe Hospital Affi liated to Hubei Medical College,Shiyan 442000,Hubei,China)

关键词:

Geramage聚合瓷; 光固化树脂; 修复; 贴面; 活髓前牙; 美学效果

Keywords:

geramage polymeric porcelain;  light-cured resin;  repair;  veneer;  vital pulp anterior teeth;  aesthetic eff ecte

分类号:

R783

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

目的：探讨间接法Geramage聚合瓷贴面修复体与直接法光固化树脂贴面修复在活髓前牙美容中的应用效果差异。方 法：选取2018年6-2021年6月就诊于笔者医院拟实施活髓前牙美容的患者100例（240颗患牙），采用随机数字表法分为研究 组和对照组各50例，研究组采用间接法Geramage聚合瓷贴面修复体修复，对照组采用直接法光固化树脂贴面修复，对比两组 修复后的菌斑指数（Plaque index,PI）、牙龈指数（Gingival index,GI）、龈沟探诊深度（Probing depth,PD）、龈沟液 中白细胞介素-1β（Interleukin-1β,IL-1β）、肿瘤坏死因子-α（Tumor necrosis factor-α,TNF-α）、修复体美学效 果。结果：修复后3个月复查，研究组的PI、GI、PD值均显著小于对照组，差异均具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；治疗前，研 究组和对照组的龈沟液中IL-1β、TNF-α水平差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；治疗后3个月，研究组的龈沟液中IL-1β、 TNF-α 水平显著低于对照组，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；治疗后12个月，研究组的修复体边缘染色、修复体与邻牙 颜色匹配度、修复体边缘适合性达到A级达标率高于对照组（P＜0.05），研究组和对照组的修复体完整度、基牙敏感程度及 牙髓状态达标率差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论：间接法Geramage聚合瓷贴面修复体在活髓前牙美容中的效果优于直 接法光固化树脂贴面修复，且对牙周组织的健康影响更小。

Abstract:

Objective To explore the diff erence in the application eff ect of indirect method Geramage polymeric porcelain veneer restoration and direct method photocurable resin veneer restoration in the aesthetics of vital pulp anterior teeth. Methods A total of 100 patients (240 aff ected teeth) who were admitted to the author’s hospital from June 2018 to June 2021 and were divided into study group and control group with 50 patients in each group by random number table method. The research team used the indirect method of Gramage polymerized porcelain veneer restoration, and the control group used direct photocuring resin veneer repair. The cosmetic eff ects of PI, GI, PD, IL-1β, TNF-α and prosthesis were compared between the two groups. Results After 3 months of repair, the PI, GI, and PD values of the study group were signifi cantly lower than the control group, and the diff erences were statistically signifi cant (P ＜0.05). Before treatment, the levels of IL-1β and TNF-α in the gingival crevicular fl uid of the study group and the control group were not statistically signifi cant (P ＞0.05). Three months after treatment, the levels of IL-1β and TNF-α in the gingival crevicular fl uid of the study group were signifi cantly lower than those in the control group, and the diff erence was statistically signifi cant (P ＜0.05). At 12 months after treatment, the edge of the prosthesis of the study group, the color matching degree of the restoration and the adjacent teeth, and the fi t of the edge of the prosthesis reached the A-level compliance rate higher than that of the control group (P＜0.05). There was no signifi cant diff erence in the integrity of the restoration, the sensitivity of the abutment and the compliance rate of the pulpal state between the study group and the control group (P ＞0.05). Conclusion The indirect method of Gramage polymer porcelain veneer prosthesis is superior to the direct photo-curing resin veneer repair in the prosthetic anterior teeth cosmetic, and has less impact on the health of the periodontal tissue.

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2024-02-04