[1] 滕芸霞,刘一凡,罗亚丽,等. 微种植体支抗辅助治疗双颌前突的临床效果分析[J].中国美容医学,2021,(8):115-118.
　 TENG Yun-xia,LIU Yi-fan,LUO Ya-li,et al. Analysis of Clinical Effects of Micro-implant Anchorage in Adjuvant Treatment ofBimaxillary Protrusion[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2021,(8):115-118.
点击复制

 微种植体支抗辅助治疗双颌前突的临床效果分析
()
分享到：

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:
期数:
2021年8期
页码:
115-118
栏目:
出版日期:
2021-08-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Analysis of Clinical Effects of Micro-implant Anchorage in Adjuvant Treatment of
Bimaxillary Protrusion
文章编号:
1008-6455(2021)08-0115-04
作者:
 滕芸霞; 刘一凡; 罗亚丽; 杜 宁
Author(s):
 TENG Yun-xia; LIU Yi-fan; LUO Ya-li; DU Ning
关键词:
 [关键词]微种植体支抗; 双颌前突; 面部美观; 头影测量值; 并发症
Keywords:
 Key words:micro-implant anchorage;  bimaxillary protrusion;  facial aesthetics;  cephalometric measurements; complications
分类号:
R783.5
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
[摘要]目的：探讨微种植体支抗治疗双颌前突对患者面部美观及头影测量值的影响。方法：选取2013年6月-2019年1月笔者
医院就诊的双颌前突患者82例，依据随机数字表法分为研究组和对照组，每组41例。对照组采取传统支抗，研究组采取微种
植体支抗。统计两组治疗时间、临床疗效、治疗前后头影测量值相关指标、并发症发生率及面部美观满意度。结果：研究
组排齐整平、精细调整及固定保持、关闭间隙时间短于对照组（P ＜0.05）；研究组总有效率95.12%，高于对照组的78.05%
（P ＜0.05）；治疗前，两组G-Sn-Pg’、Pg’B’-FH、Li-E、Ls-E、IMPA、L1-NB、U1-NA、U1-SN间比较无显著差异（P ＞
0.05），治疗后，研究组G-Sn-Pg’、Pg’B’-FH大于对照组，Li-E、Ls-E、IMPA、L1-NB、U1-NA、U1-SN低于对照组（P
＜0.05）；研究组并发症发生率（4.88%）低于对照组（19.51%）（P ＜0.05）；研究组面部美观满意度（95.12%）高于对照
组（78.05%）（P ＜0.05）。结论：采取微种植体支抗治疗双颌前突患者，可缩短治疗时间，改善面部状况，提高整体治疗
效果，降低并发症发生风险，且面部美观满意度较高。

Abstract:
Abstract:Objective To investigate the effect of micro-implant anchoragel treatment on the prognosis of facial aesthetics and
cephalometric values of patients with bimaxillary protrusion. Methods From June 2013 to January 2019, 82 patients
with bimaxillary protrusion in our hospital were divided into a research group and a control group according to the
random number table method, with 41 cases in each. The control group adopted traditional anchorage, and the research
group adopted micro-implant anchorage. The treatment time, clinical efficacy, related indexes of cephalometric
measurements before and after treatment, incidence of complications, and facial aesthetic satisfaction were counted.
Results In the study group, the time for alignment, fine adjustment, fixed maintenance, and closing of the gap was
shorter than that of the control group (P ＜0.05),the total effective rate of the study group (95.12%) was higher than that
of the control group (78.05%) (P ＜0.05).Before treatment, there was no significant difference between the two groups
G-Sn-Pg’, Pg’B’-FH, Li-E, Ls-E, IMPA, L1-NB, U1-NA, U1-SN (P ＞0.05), after treatment, G-Sn-Pg ’and Pg’B’-FH in the
study group were greater than those in the control group, and Li-E, Ls-E, IMPA, L1-NB, U1-NA, and U1-SN were lower
than those in the control group (P ＜0.05).The incidence of complications in the study group (4.88%) was lower than that in
the control group (19.51%) (P ＜0.05).The facial aesthetic satisfaction of the study group (95.12%) was higher than that of the
control group (78.05%) (P ＜0.05). Conclusion Micro-implant anchorage treatment of patients with bimaxillary protrusion can
shorten the treatment time, improve the facial condition, improve the overall treatment effect, reduce the risk of complications,
and have a higher facial aesthetic satisfaction.

相似文献/References:

[1] 郭爱军,管 玮,周 渊,等. 种植钉强支抗内收上下颌前牙软组织侧貌研究[J].中国美容医学,2020,(12):123.
　 GUO Ai-jun,GUAN Wei,ZHOU Yuan,et al. A study on the Profile of Soft Tissue after Using Implant to Retract Upper and LowerAnterior Teeth[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2020,(8):123.
[2]王 兰,谢永林.骨皮质切开术联合滑动直丝弓矫治技术在成人双颌前突矫治中的应用[J].中国美容医学,2023,(4):115.
　WANG Lan,XIE Yonglin.Application of Cortical Osteotomy Combined with Sliding Straight Wire Arch in the Correction of Bimaxillary Protrusion in Adults[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2023,(8):115.
[3]肖子轶,罗 芬,李 婧,等.高转矩自锁托槽矫治双颌前突的疗效及对牙根形态及根尖外吸收的影响分析[J].中国美容医学,2023,(4):151.
　XIAO Ziyi,LUO Fen,LI Jing,et al.Analysis of the Effect of High Torque Self-locking Bracket in the Treatment of Bimaxillary Protrusion and Its Infl uence on Root Morphology and External Apical Root Resorption[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2023,(8):151.
[4]晏 艳,杜 熹,曹良菊,等.成年女性安氏Ⅰ类双颌前突患者拔牙矫治后唇周软组织变化与貌美人群的对比研究[J].中国美容医学,2023,(9):120.[doi:10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.005893]
　YAN Yan,DU Xi,CAO Liangju,et al.A Comparative Study on Change of Extraction of Four premolars on Lip Soft Tissue in Class I Adult Women with Bimaxillary Protrusion and Beauty[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2023,(8):120.[doi:10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.005893]
[5]卿 凤,郑宇祥.微种植体支抗与J钩支抗在双颌前突患者系统矫治中的效果比较[J].中国美容医学,2024,(1):63.[doi:10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.006095]
　QING Feng,ZHENG Yuxiang.Comparison of the Effi cacy of Micrograft Anchorage and J-hook Anchorage in Systematic Correction of Patients with Bimaxillary Protrusion[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2024,(8):63.[doi:10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.006095]
[6]黄敏华,李 击,张 玲.微种植体支抗在双颌前突矫治中的应用效果及对软组织侧貌和鼻唇颏协调性的影响[J].中国美容医学,2024,(5):62.
　HUANG Minhua,LI Ji,ZHANG Ling.Effects of Micro-implant Anchorage Correction on Soft Tissue Profi le and Nasolabial Chin Coordination in Patients with Bimaxillary Protrusion[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2024,(8):62.
[7]王 婵.骨皮质切开术联合个性化舌侧矫治技术在成人严重双颌前突矫治中的应用[J].中国美容医学,2024,(9):66.
　WANG Chan.Application of Corticotomy Combined with Personalized Lingual Correction in the Treatment of Severe Bimaxillary Protrusion in Adults[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2024,(8):66.
[8]易文静,曹安怡,蓝善稀,等.微种植体支抗联合正畸治疗成人双颌前突疗效分析[J].中国美容医学,2024,(9):118.
　YI Wenjing,CAO Anyi,LAN Shanxi,et al.Clinical Analysis of Micro-implant Anchorage Combined with Orthodontics in the Treatment of Bimaxillary Protrusion in Adults[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2024,(8):118.

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-09-10