[1] 唐晓莉,陈碧华,钟 英,等. 不同美容护理干预预防COVID-19防疫医护人员鼻面部压力性损伤效果观察[J].中国美容医学,2020,(5):157-160.
　 TANG Xiao-li,CHEN Bi-hua,ZHONG Ying,et al. The Clinical Effect of Different Cosmetic Nursing Interventions on Prevention of Nasaland Facial Pressure Injury in the Medical Staff during the Battling Against of the COVID-19[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2020,(5):157-160.
点击复制

 不同美容护理干预预防COVID-19防疫医护人员鼻面部压力性损伤效果观察
()
分享到：

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:
期数:
2020年5期
页码:
157-160
栏目:
出版日期:
2020-05-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
 The Clinical Effect of Different Cosmetic Nursing Interventions on Prevention of Nasal
and Facial Pressure Injury in the Medical Staff during the Battling Against of the COVID-19
文章编号:
1008-6455（2020）05-0157-03
作者:
 唐晓莉; 陈碧华; 钟 英; 刘海燕; 李金林
Author(s):
 TANG Xiao-li; CHEN Bi-hua; ZHONG Ying; LIU Hai-yan; LI Jin-lin
关键词:
 [关键词]新型冠状病毒肺炎; 美容护理干预; 压力性损伤; 鼻面部; 超薄泡沫敷料; 水胶体敷料; 满意度
Keywords:
 key words: COVID-19;  cosmetic nursing intervention;  pressure injury;  nasal and facial;  ultra thin foam dressing;  hydrocolloiddressing;  satisfaction
分类号:
R473
文献标志码:
B
摘要:
[摘要]目的：探讨不同美容护理干预在新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间预防医护人员鼻面部压力性损伤的效果。方法：将2020年
1月-2020年3月笔者医院隔离病房的80例接受护理干预的医护人员随机分为对照组（40例）和观察组（40例），对照组采用
水胶体敷料护理干预，观察组采用超薄泡沫敷料护理干预，比较两组医护人员鼻面部压力性损伤的发生情况及满意度。结
果：观察组鼻面部压力性损伤发生率为7.5%（3/40）低于对照组的25.0%（10/40），且观察组医护人员对敷料舒适性满意度
评分显著高于对照组，差异均具有统计学意义（P ＜0.05）。结论：在预防医护人员鼻面部压力性损伤的发生中，超薄泡沫
敷料效果优于水胶体敷料，且舒适度更高。

Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical curative effects of different cosmetic nursing interventions on preventing nasal
and facial pressure injury of medical staff during the battling against of the COVID-19. Methods 80 anti-COVID-19 medical
workers receiving nursing intervention in the isolation ward of our hospital were randomly divided into the control group (40
cases) and the observation group (40 cases) from January to March 2020. The control group was treated with hydrocolloid
dressing, while the observation group was treated with ultra thin foam dressing. The nasal and facial pressure injury and
satisfaction in two groups were compared. Results The incidence of nasal and facial pressure injury in the observation group
was 7.5%(3/40) lower than that in the control group[25.0%(10/40)], and the satisfaction score of medical staff in the observation
group was signifi cantly higher than that in the control group, the differences were statistically signifi cant(P ＜0.05). Conclusion
Ultra thin foam dressing is superior to hydrocolloid dressing in preventing the occurrence of nasal and facial pressure injury of
medical staff during the battling against of the COVID-19, and it’s more comfortable.

相似文献/References:

[1] 祁 俊,胡克苏,曹 玲,等. 新型冠状病毒肺炎定点救治医院烧伤整形科患者的分类管理及防护策略[J].中国美容医学,2020,(7):84.
　 QI Jun,HU Ke-su,CAO Ling,et al. Corona Virus Disease 2019(COVID-19) Treatment and Management of Burn andPlastic Surgery in Hospitals[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2020,(5):84.
[2] 张 旭,秦 文,孙唯夫,等. 突发公共卫生事件下的口腔正畸临床诊疗管理[J].中国美容医学,2021,(9):160.
　 ZHANG Xu,QIN Wen,SUN Wei-fu,et al. Management of Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Orthodontics in Public HealthEmergencies[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2021,(5):160.

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-05-29