系统性护理干预对睑内翻矫正患者术后心理状况及预后满意度的影响<br />-《中国美容医学》

文章信息/Info

Title:: Impact of Systemic Nursing Intervention on the Psychological Status and Prognostic
Satisfaction of Patients Treated with Correction Entropion

文章编号:: 1008-6455（2020）12-0181-04

作者:: 武小鸥; 郭娟; 覃冬

Author(s):: WU Xiao-ou; GUO Juan; QIN Dong

关键词:: [关键词]系统性护理; 睑内翻矫正术; 心理状况; 舒适度; 外观恢复满意度

Keywords:: Key words: systemic nursing; correction entropion; psychological condition; comfort; satisfaction of appearance recovery

分类号:: R473

文献标志码:: B

摘要:: [摘要]目的：分析系统性护理干预对睑内翻矫正术患者心理状况、舒适度及外观恢复满意度的影响。方法：回顾性分析
2018年1月-2019年1月于笔者医院接受睑内翻矫正术的85例上睑内翻患者临床资料，根据护理方法的差异分为研究组和对照
组。对照组给予常规护理，研究组在此基础上增加系统性护理干预。比较两组心理状况[采用焦虑自评量表（Self-rating
anxiety scale，SAS）和抑郁自评量表（Self-rating depression scale，SDS）进行评估]、舒适度[采用舒适状况量表
（General comfort questionnaire，GCQ）评估]、外观恢复满意度[采用数字评分系统（Numeric rating scale，NRS）评
估]及并发症发生情况。结果：两组护理前SAS、SDS评分比较差异无统计学意义（P ＞0.05）；护理后两组SAS、SDS评分均降
低，且研究组均低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P ＜0.05）。两组护理前生理、心理、社会文化和环境评分比较差异无统
计学意义（P ＞0.05）；护理后两组生理、心理、社会文化和环境评分均升高，且研究组护均高于对照组，差异有统计学意
义（P ＜0.05）。两组护理前NRS评分比较差异无统计学意义（P ＞0.05）。护理后1周及1个月研究组NRS评分高于对照组，差
异有统计学意义（P ＜0.05）。研究组术后并发症发生率（4.44%）低于对照组（20.00%）, 差异有统计学意义（χ2=4.936，
P =0.026）。结论：系统性护理可改善睑内翻矫正术患者心理状况，提高舒适度及外观恢复满意度，并降低术后并发症发生
率，值得临床推广。

Abstract:: Abstract: Objective To analyze the impact of systemic nursing intervention on the psychological status, comfort, and
satisfaction with appearance recovery of patients treated with correction entropion. Methods The clinical data of 85 patients
with upper eyelid entropion who underwent correction entropion in our hospital from January 2018 to January 2019 were
retrospectively analyzed. According to the difference in nursing methods, they were divided into the study group and the
control group. The control group was given routine nursing care, and the study group was supplemented systematic nursing
intervention.The psychological status between the two groups were compared [using the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and
Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS)], comfort [using the General comfort questionnaire (GCQ)], satisfaction with appearance
recovery [using Numeric rating scale (NRS)] and complications. Results There was no difference in SAS and SDS scores
between the two groups before nursing (P ＞0.05). After nursing, the SAS and SDS scores of the two groups reduced, and the
SAS and SDS scores of the study group were lower than those of the control group, the difference was statistically significant
(P ＜0.05). There was no difference in the scores of physiology, psychology, social culture and environment between the two
groups before nursing (P ＞0.05). After nursing, the scores of physiology, psychology, social culture and environment in the two
groups reduced, and the scores of the study group were lower than those of the control group (P ＜0.05). There was no difference
in the NRS scores between the two groups before nursing (P ＞0.05). One week and one month after nursing, the NRS score of
the study group was higher than that of the control group (P ＜0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the study
group (4.44%) was lower than that in the control group (20.00%, χ2=4.936, P =0.026). Conclusion Systematic nursing care
can improve the psychological condition of patients treated with correction entropion, improve comfort and satisfaction with
appearance recovery, and reduce postoperative complications. It is worthy of clinical promotion.

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

文章信息/Info

常用功能

导航/Navigate

工具/Tools

统计/Statistics