[1] 杜雪梅,白伟志. 非剥脱性点阵激光联合医用杀菌液体敷料治疗痤疮瘢痕疗效观察[J].中国美容医学,2021,(7):68-70.
  DU Xue-mei,BAI Wei-zhi. Efficacy of Non-Ablative Fractional Laser Combined with Medical Sterilizing LiquidDressing in the Treatment of Acne Scars[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2021,(7):68-70.
点击复制

 非剥脱性点阵激光联合医用杀菌液体敷料治疗痤疮瘢痕疗效观察
()
分享到:

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:
期数:
2021年7期
页码:
68-70
栏目:
出版日期:
2021-07-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Efficacy of Non-Ablative Fractional Laser Combined with Medical Sterilizing Liquid
Dressing in the Treatment of Acne Scars
文章编号:
1008-6455(2021)07-0068-03
作者:
 杜雪梅白伟志
Author(s):
 DU Xue-mei BAI Wei-zhi
关键词:
 [关键词]痤疮瘢痕1 540nm非剥脱性点阵激光医用杀菌液体敷料疗效
Keywords:
 Key words: acne scars non-ablative 1 540nm fractional laser medical sterilizing liquid dressing efficacy
分类号:
R619+.6
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
[摘要]目的:探究1 540nm非剥脱性点阵激光联合医用杀菌液体敷料治疗痤疮瘢痕的疗效。方法:选取2018年5月-2019年5月
笔者医院收治的76例痤疮瘢痕患者为研究对象,按照随机数字法将患者分为观察组和对照组,每组38例。两组均采用1 540nm
非剥脱性点阵激光治疗,治疗后,对照组采用常规医用冰袋冷敷,观察组在常规医用冰袋冷敷基础上加用医用杀菌液体敷
料湿敷。每月治疗1次,连续治疗5次,治疗后评价两组疗效。采用痤疮瘢痕权重评分表(ECCA)对两组患者治疗前后进行评
分。评价两组患者治疗后的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、疼痛持续时间、完全愈合时间和不良反应发生情况。结果:治疗后,
观察组总有效率92.11%,高于对照组的73.68%(P <0.05);两组ECCA权重评分均低于同组治疗前,且观察组低于对照组
(P <0.05);观察组VAS评分低于对照组,疼痛持续时间及完全愈合时间均短于对照组(P <0.05);观察组不良反应发生
率18.42%,低于对照组的39.47%(P<0.05)。结论:1 540nm非剥脱性点阵激光联合医用杀菌液体敷料治疗痤疮瘢痕能够显
著提高疗效,缩短恢复时间,减少不良反应的发生。

Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To investigate the efficacy of non-ablative 1 540nm fractional laser combined with medical sterilizing
liquid dressing in the treatment of acne scars. Methods 76 patients with acne scars who were treated in our hospital were
selectedfrom May 2018 to May 2019. According to the random number method, the patients were divided into the observation
group (n =38) and the control group (n =38). Both groups were treated with 1540nm fractional laser. On this basics, After
treatment, the control group was treated with medical ice pack and the observation group added wet compress with medical
sterilizing liquid dressing on the basis of conventional medical ice pack cold compress. Treatment was performed once / month,
and 5 consecutive treatments. The efficacy of the two groups was compared after treatment, and the clinical evaluation scale of
acne scar (ECCA) before and after treatment was used to score the two groups. Visual analogue scores (VAS), duration of pain,
healing time and adverse reactions were evaluated after treatment in both groups. Results After treatment, The total effective
rate of the observation group was 92.11%, higher than 73.68% of the control group (P <0.05). After treatment,theECCAscores
in both groups were both lower than that before treatment in the same group, and that in the observation group was lower than
that in the control group (P <0.05). After treatment,the VAS scorein the observation group was lower than that in the control
group, and the duration of painand healing time in the observation groupwere all shorter than those in the control group (P <0.05).
The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 18.42%, lower than39.47% in the control group (P <0.05).
Conclusion The non-ablative 1540nm fractional laser combine with medical sterilizing liquid dressing in the treatment of acne
scars, which can improve curative effect, shorten recovery time and reduce adverse reactions.

相似文献/References:

[1] 王 洁,何振兴,赵菊花,等. A型肉毒毒素治疗痤疮瘢痕疗效的影响因素分析[J].中国美容医学,2021,(10):101.
  WANG Jie,HE Zhen-xing,ZHAO Ju-hua,et al. Analysis of Influencing Factors of Botulinum Toxin A in the Treatment of Acne Scar[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2021,(7):101.

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-08-03