[1]郭 彦,孔 玉,赵许兵.不同修复方法在下颌低平牙槽嵴患者中的应用比较[J].中国美容医学,2023,(9):164-167.[doi:10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.005897]
　GUO Yan,KONG Yu,ZHAO Xubing.Comparison of Application of Different Restoration Methods in Patients with Atrophic Mandibular Alveolar Ridge[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2023,(9):164-167.[doi:10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.005897]
点击复制

不同修复方法在下颌低平牙槽嵴患者中的应用比较()
分享到：

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:
期数:
2023年9期
页码:
164-167
栏目:
出版日期:
2023-09-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of Application of Different Restoration Methods in Patients with Atrophic Mandibular Alveolar Ridge
文章编号:
1008-6455（2023）09-0164-04
作者:
郭 彦; 孔 玉; 赵许兵
(西安交通大学口腔医院陕西省颅颌面精准医学研究重点实验室 陕西 西安 710004 )
Author(s):
GUO Yan; KONG Yu; ZHAO Xubing
(Key Laboratory of Shaanxi Province for Craniofacial Precision Medicine Research,College of Stomatology,Xian Jiaotong University,Xian 710004,Shaanxi,China)
关键词:
生物功能性义齿修复系统; 活动义齿修复; 下颌低平牙槽嵴; 传统全口义齿修复; 满意度
Keywords:
biofunctional prosthetic system removable denture restoration;  atrophic mandibular alveolar ridge traditional complete denture restoration satisfaction
分类号:
R783.6
DOI:
10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.005897
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：分析比较不同修复方法在下颌低平牙槽嵴患者中的应用效果。方法：选择2019年3月-2021年9月于笔者医院就 诊的130例下颌低平牙槽嵴患者为研究对象，采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组，每组65例。对照组患者采用传统方法 进行修复，观察组患者采用生物功能性义齿修复系统（Biofunctional prosthetic system ，BPS）进行修复，比较两组患者 修复后的牙周情况[牙龈出血指数（Sulcus bleeding index，SBI）、菌斑指数（Plaque index，PLI）]、牙齿性能（咀嚼 功能、牙齿美观度、牢固程度、语言功能）、不适感发生率、口腔健康生活质量及患者对修复满意度的差异。结果：修复 后，两组SBI、PLI均明显低于修复前（P＜0.05），且观察组治疗后SBI、PLI均明显低于对照组（P＜0.05）。修复后，两组患 者咀嚼功能、牙齿美观度、患者修复后牙齿的稳固程度及语言功能评分均优于修复前（P＜0.05），且观察组修复后牙齿的稳 固程度及语言功能评分均明显优于对照组（P＜0.05）；修复后，观察组患者不适感发生率显著低于对照组（P＜0.05）。修复 后，两组患者口腔疼痛、身体机能、心理状况、独立能力和总分均明显降低（P＜0.05），且观察组修复后各单项评分和总 分均明显低于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组患者修复满意度明显优于对照组（P＜0.05）。结论：采用BPS对下颌低平牙槽嵴 患者进行活动义齿修复疗效确切，相较于传统全口义齿修复方法可更好地改善患者修复后口腔健康生活质量、牙龈出血和细 菌感染情况，增强咀嚼、语言等功能，提高牙齿稳固程度和美观程度，患者满意度更高。
Abstract:
Objective To analyze and compare the application eff ects of diff erent restoration methods on patients with atrophic mandibular alveolar ridge. Methods Totally 130 patients with atrophic mandibular alveolar ridge who were treated in the author’s hospital from March 2019 to September 2021 were selected as the research subjects, and they were divided into control group and observation group, with 65 cases in each group. The patients in control group were repaired by traditional method, and the patients in observation group were repaired by biofunctional prosthetic system (BPS). The periodontal conditions [sulcus bleeding index (SBI), plaque index (PLI)], tooth performance (chewing function, tooth aesthetics, stability degree, language function), incidence rate of discomfort, oral health quality of life and the satisfaction of patients towards restoration were compared between the two groups. Results After restoration, the SBI and PLI of the two groups were signifi cantly lower than those before restoration (P ＜0.05), and the SBI and PLI in observation group were signifi cantly lower than those in control group after treatment (P ＜0.05). After restoration, the scores of chewing function, tooth aesthetics, tooth stability degree after restoration and language function after restoration were better than those before restoration (P＜0.05), and the scores of tooth stability degree and language function after restoration in observation group were signifi cantly better than those in control group (P ＜0.05). After restoration, the incidence rate of discomfort in observation group was signifi cantly lower than that in control group (P ＜0.05). After restoration, the score of oral pain, physical function, psychological status and independence and total score of the two groups were signifi cantly reduced (P ＜0.05), and the scores of items and total score in observation group after restoration were signifi cantly lower than those in control group (P ＜0.05). After restoration, the satisfaction degree of patients in observation group was signifi cantly better than that in control group (P ＜0.05). Conclusion BPS for removable denture restoration in patients with atrophic mandibular alveolar ridge has a definite efficacy. Compared with traditional complete denture prosthesis, it can better improve the oral health quality of life after restoration, improve gum bleeding and bacterial infection, and enhance chewing function, language function, tooth stability degree and aesthetics, and make patients more satisfi ed.
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-10-16