[1]薛环东,陆 涛,于 芳.皮秒激光治疗文身的随机对照研究[J].中国美容医学,2023,(10):106-108.[doi:10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.005920]
点击复制

皮秒激光治疗文身的随机对照研究()
分享到：

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:
期数:
2023年10期
页码:
106-108
栏目:
出版日期:
2023-10-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Picosecond Laser in the Treatment of Tattoo XUE Huandong,LU Tao,YU Fang
文章编号:
1008-6455（2023）10-0106-03
作者:
薛环东; 陆 涛; 于 芳
(赤峰学院附属医院皮肤病与性病科 内蒙古 赤峰 024000 )
Author(s):
(Department of Dermatology and Venereal Diseases,Affi liated Hospital of Chifeng University,Chifeng 024000, Inner Mongolia,China)
关键词:
皮秒激光; 文身; 美学效果; 疼痛
Keywords:
picosecond laser;  tattoo;  cosmetic eff ect;  pain
分类号:
R622+ .1
DOI:
10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.005920
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：探究皮秒激光治疗文身的美学效果。方法：选取2020年1月-2021年1月于笔者医院门诊部去除文身者106例为研 究对象，采用随机数字表法将就医者分为对照组及研究组，每组53例。对照组行普通激光去除文身，研究组给予皮秒级激 光治疗。比较两种方法的治疗疗效，采用视觉模拟评分法（Visual analogue scale，VAS）评价就医者治疗期间、治疗后 6 h 、24 h的疼痛程度，并统计就医者治疗后不良反应发生情况。结果：研究组治疗总有效率高于对照组（P＜0.05）；研究 组治疗期间VAS评分低于对照组（P＜0.05），两组治疗后6 h、24 h的VAS评分差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；对照组不良反 应发生率为3.77%（2/53），观察组为5.66%（3/53），两组不良反应发生率对比差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论：皮 秒激光治疗文身的临床疗效较好，且就医者术中疼痛较轻。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the cosmetic eff ect of picosecond laser in the treatment of tattoo. Methods A total of 106 patients undergoing tattoo removal in outpatient department of Affi liated Hospital of Chifeng University were enrolled as the research objects between January 2020 and January 2021. According to random number table method, they were divided into control group and study group, 53 cases/group. The control group was treated with ordinary laser, while study group was treated with picosecond laser for tattoo-removal. The curative eff ect in the two groups was compared. The pain degree was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) during treatment, at 6h and 24h after treatment. The occurrence of adverse reactions such as blisters and blood blisters after treatment was statistically analyzed. Results The overall effi ciency of in study group was higher than that in control group (P ＜0.05). The VAS score in study group was lower than that in control group during treatment (P＜0.05). At 6h and 24h after treatment, there was no significant difference in the VAS scores between the two groups (P＞0.05). There was no signifi cant diff erence in the incidence of adverse reactions between study group and control group [3.77% (2/53) VS 5.66% (3/53),P ＞0.05]. Conclusion The clinical curative eff ect of picosecond laser is good on tattoos, with relatively miler intraoperative pain.

相似文献/References:

[1] 李 梁 管晓玉 综述,白 南 陈远征审校. 皮秒激光在皮肤美容中的临床应用进展[J].中国美容医学,2021,(9):185.
　 LI Liang,GUAN Xiao-yu,BAI Nan,et al. Progress in Clinical Application of Picosecond Laser in Skin Cosmetology[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2021,(10):185.
[2]吴志波,周颖华,彭一业,等.皮秒激光联合微针治疗炎症后色素沉着临床观察[J].中国美容医学,2022,(12):85.
　WU Zhibo,ZHOU Yinghua,PENG Yiye,et al.The Clinical Observation of Pico-second Laser Combined with Micro-needle Therapy on Treating Postinfl ammatory Hyperpigmentation[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2022,(10):85.
[3]高 莹,王建才,朱 芸,等.755 nm皮秒激光治疗不同类型儿童色素增加性皮肤病的临床研究[J].中国美容医学,2023,(8):71.[doi:10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.005827]
　GAO Ying,WANG Jiancai,ZHU Yun,et al.Clinical Study on 755 nm Picosecond Laser in the Treatment of Children with Different Types of Hyperpigmentation Dermatosis?/html>[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2023,(10):71.[doi:10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.005827]

更新日期/Last Update: 2023-11-03