«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:

期数:

2022年11期

页码:

165-167

栏目:

出版日期:

2022-11-10

文章信息/Info

Title:

Application Value of Digital Guide Plate Technology in Implant Fixed Denture Restoration of Middle and Old Aged Patients with Dentition Loss

文章编号:

1008-6455（2022）11-0165-03

作者:

任英华; 倪宇昕; 谢安琪; 杨 芬; 刘 学

(华中科技大学协和深圳医院口腔科 广东 深圳 518052)

Author(s):

REN Yinghua;  NI Yuxin;  XIE Anqi;  YANG Fen;  LIU Xue

(Department of Stomatology, Union Shenzhen Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518052, Guangdong, China)

关键词:

数字化导板; 牙列缺失; 中老年; 种植; 固定义齿

Keywords:

digital guide plate;  dentition loss;  middle and old aged ;  implant;  fi xed denture

分类号:

R782.12

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

目的：探讨数字化导板技术在中老年牙列缺失患者种植固定义齿修复中的应用价值。方法：连续性纳入2018年1 月-2019年12月笔者医院口腔科收治的50例中老年牙列缺失患者，按照随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组，每组25例。对 照组患者行常规牙种植修复，观察组患者行数字化导板技术辅助下的种植固定义齿修复。比较两组的种植体精度、语言功 能、咀嚼效率、美学效果及并发症情况。结果：对照组共植入158枚种植体，观察组共植入160枚种植体。修复后1个月， 观察组的冠部误差[(0.49±0.12)mm vs (0.80±0.27)mm]、根部误差[(0.51±0.26)mm vs (0.84±0.28)mm]、深度误差 [(0.43±0.11)mm vs (0.72±0.20)mm]、角度误差[(0.12±0.05)°vs (0.19±0.08)°]均明显小于对照组，差异有统计学 意义（P＜0.05）；观察组的语言功能评分[(8.47±1.12)分 vs (7.10±1.05)分]及咀嚼效率[(83.60±8.54)% vs (71.49±7.22)%]均明显高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P ＜0.05）；两组的美学效果比较差异无统计学意 义（P＞0.05）；观察组的并发症发生率（1.88% vs 6.96%）明显低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论：数字 化导板技术用于中老年牙列缺失患者种植固定义齿修复的精确性好，能够明显改善患者的语言及咀嚼功能，降低并发症。

Abstract:

Objective To discuss the application value of digital guide plate technology in implant fi xed denture restoration of middle and old aged patients with dentition loss. Methods 50 cases of middle and old aged patients with dentition loss who was successively included in the department of stomatology of our hospital from January 2018 to December 2019. They were divided into control group and observation group according to random number table method, with 25 cases in each group. The patients were received routine dental implant restoration in the control group, and the patients were received implant fixed denture restoration assisted by digital guide plate technology. The implant precision, speech function, masticatory effi ciency, aesthetic eff ect and complications were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 158 implants were implanted in the control group and 160 implants were implanted in the observation group. At 1 month after repair, the head error[(0.49±0.12) mm vs (0.80±0.27)mm], root error[(0.51±0.26)mm vs (0.84±0.28)mm], depth error[(0.43±0.11)mm vs (0.72±0.20)mm], angle error[(0.12±0.05)°vs (0.19±0.08)°] in observation group was signifi cantly less than that in the control group（P＜0.05）.The speech function scores[(8.47±1.12)points vs (7.10±1.05)points] and masticatory effi ciency[(83.60±8.54)% vs (71.49±7.22)%] in observation group was signifi cantly higher than that in the control group（P＜0.05）. There was no signifi cant diff erence in aesthetic eff ect between the two groups（P＞0.05）.The occurrence rate of complications[1.88%(3/160) vs 6.96%(11/145)] in observation group was signifi cantly lower than that in the control group（P＜0.05）. Conclusion The digital guide plate technology had good precision in implant fi xed denture restoration of middle and old aged patients with dentition loss. It could signifi cantly improve the speech and masticatory function of patients and reduce complications.

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-11-23