[1]李苑荟,邢孔才,王怡婷. Helioseal F树脂型封闭剂与FUJI Ⅶ玻璃离子型在龋高危儿童中的防龋效果比较[J].中国美容医学,2019,(05):118-120.
　LI Yuan-hui,XING Kong-cai,WANG Yi-ting. Comparison of Caries Prevention Effectiveness Between Helioseal F Resin-basedand FUJI Ⅶ Glass Ionomer Sealant in Children with High Risk Caries[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(05):118-120.
点击复制

 Helioseal F树脂型封闭剂与FUJI Ⅶ玻璃离子型在龋高危儿童中的防龋效果比较
()
分享到：

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:
期数:
2019年05期
页码:
118-120
栏目:
出版日期:
2019-05-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Comparison of Caries Prevention Effectiveness Between Helioseal F Resin-based
and FUJI Ⅶ Glass Ionomer Sealant in Children with High Risk Caries
文章编号:
1008-6455(2019)05-0118-03
作者:
李苑荟1; 邢孔才2; 王怡婷1
Author(s):
LI Yuan-hui1;  XING Kong-cai2;  WANG Yi-ting1
关键词:
[关键词]磨牙; 龋齿; 窝沟封闭; 树脂型封闭剂; 玻璃离子型封闭剂
Keywords:
Key words: molars;  dental caries;  microfilled sealant;  resin-based sealant;  glass ionomer sealant;  caries prevention effectiveness
分类号:
R788+.1
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
[摘要]目的：比较Helioseal F树脂型封闭剂与FUJI Ⅶ玻璃离子型在龋高危儿童中的防龋效果。方法：按照随机数字法将
2013年6月-2016年6月在笔者医院实施窝沟封闭的80例(226颗牙)儿童分为A组(114颗牙)与B组(112颗牙)，每组40例。A组使
用Helioseal F树脂型封闭剂，B组使用FUJI Ⅶ玻璃离子型，在封闭后0.5、1、2年时进行回访，比较两组的封闭剂保留率
及龋病发生率。结果：回访2年后，A组与B组的复查牙数分别为101颗、96颗，回访率分别为88.60%、85.71%。在0.5、1、2
年回访时，A组的封闭剂保留率分别为97.37%、93.63%、93.07%，B组的封闭剂保留率分别为91.96%、82.24%、65.63%，两
组比较，差异具有统计学意义(P ＜0.05)；A组的龋病发生率分别为0.00%、0.91%、2.97%，B组的龋病发生率分别为0.89%、
0.93%、6.25%，两组比较差异无统计学意义(P ＞0.05)。结论：两种封闭剂均能有效降低龋病发生率，Helioseal F树脂型封
闭剂的防龋效果优于FUJI Ⅶ玻璃离子型。
Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To compare the caries prevention effectiveness between Helioseal F resin-based and FUJI Ⅶ glass ionomer
sealant in children with high risk caries. Methods 80(226 teeth) children with high risk caries who was planed to carry out
microfilled sealant which was divided into group A(n =40, 114 teeth) and group B(n =40,112 teeth) according to random number
method in our hospital from 2013.6-2016.6. Helioseal F resin-based sealant was used in group A and FUJI Ⅶ glass ionomer
sealant was used in group B. Follow-up examinations were conducted at 0.5, 1, and 2 years after sealing in order to compare
the retention rate of sealant and incidence rate of caries between two groups. Results Two years after the return visit, the
numbers of reexamination teeth in group A and group B was 101 and 96, respectively, and the return visit rate was 88.60% and
85.71%, respectively. At the return visit of 0.5, 1 and 2 years, the retention rate of sealant of group A was 97.37%, 93.63% and
93.07%, and that of group B was 91.96%, 82.24% and 65.63%, respectively and there was statistically significant difference
between two groups (P ＜0.05).Theincidence rate of caries of group A was 0.00%, 0.91%, 2.97%, and 0.89%, 0.93% and 6.25%,
respectively and there was no statistically significant difference between two groups (P ＞0.05). Conclusion Both of sealants
could effectively prevent the incidence rate of caries. The Helioseal F resin-based sealant was superior to the FUJI Ⅶ glass
ionomer sealant in caries prevention.

相似文献/References:

[1] 李爱萍,王丽昕,廖 旭. 玻璃离子窝沟封闭术在乳磨牙龋齿防治中的应用效果观察[J].中国美容医学,2021,(9):140.
　 LI Ai-ping,WANG Li-xin,LIAO Xu. Application Effect of Glass Ionomer as Pit and Fissure Sealant on Prevention ofDeciduous Molar Dental Caries[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2021,(05):140.
[2]符 恋,顾 明.光固化流动树脂与传统窝沟封闭剂在窝沟封闭中的应用效果对比研究[J].中国美容医学,2022,(1):123.
　FU Lian,GU Ming.Comparative Study on the Application Effects of Light-cured Flowable Resin and Traditional Pit and Fissure Sealant in Pit and Fissure Sealing[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2022,(05):123.
[3]潘 玲,许 燕.可见光固化复合树脂修复成人龋齿的美学效果及并发症研究[J].中国美容医学,2022,(7):134.
　PAN Ling,XU Yan.Study on Aesthetic Effect and Complications of Resin Repair for Adult Caries[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2022,(05):134.
[4]李晓丽 综述,张石楠 刘 娟 审校.父母因素对低龄儿童龋影响的研究进展[J].中国美容医学,2022,(11):184.
　LI Xiaoli,ZHANG Shinan,LIU Juan.Impact of Parental Factors on Early Childhood Caries[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2022,(05):184.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-06-11