«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:

期数:

2021年7期

页码:

75-78

栏目:

出版日期:

2021-07-10

文章信息/Info

Title:

 Observation on the Curative Effect of Introducing Soothing Sensitive Therapeutic
Instrument into Medical Skincare Products to Treat Sensitive Skin

文章编号:

1008-6455（2021）07-0075-04

作者:

 杨瑜萍; 陈俐均; 王洁君; 景万仓

Author(s):

 YANG Yu-ping;  CHEN Li-jun;  WANG Jie-jun;  JING Wan-cang

关键词:

 [关键词]敏感性皮肤; 舒敏治疗仪; 舒敏保湿特护霜; 临床疗效

Keywords:

 Key words: sensitive skin;  soothing sensitive therapeutic instrument;  soothing sensitive moisturizing cream;  clinical effects

分类号:

R322.99

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

[摘要]目的：观察舒敏治疗仪导入医学护肤品治疗敏感性皮肤的疗效及对患者生活质量的影响。方法：选取2019年5月-2020
年10月在笔者科室就诊的106例女性面部敏感性皮肤患者为研究对象。采用随机数字法分为对照组和观察组，每组53例。对
照组给予外擦薇诺娜舒敏保湿特护霜，2次/天；观察组在对照组基础上加用舒敏治疗仪导入特护霜治疗，1次/周。连续治
疗1个月后，比较两组临床疗效，皮损症状评分，皮肤生理状态，皮肤生活质量指数（Dermatology life quality index,
DLQI）及患者满意度。结果：观察组总有效率92.45%，显著高于对照组的73.58%，差异有统计学意义（P ＜0.05）。治疗
后，两组瘙痒、灼热、紧绷感，红斑，鳞屑，皮损面积评分均低于治疗前，且观察组各项皮肤评分均低于对照组，差异均有
统计学意义（P ＜0.05）；两组角质层含水量、油脂含量均高于治疗前，且观察组高于对照组，两组经表皮失水量均低于治
疗前，且观察组低于对照组，差异均有统计学意义（P ＜0.05）；两组DLQI评分均低于治疗前，且观察组低于对照组；观察
组满意度81.13%，高于对照组的66.03%，差异均有统计学意义（P ＜0.05）。结论：舒敏治疗仪导入医学护肤品治疗面部敏
感性皮肤可明显改善患者临床症状，提高其皮肤生理状态，从而降低敏感皮肤对患者生活质量的影响，且治疗舒适，患者满
意度高，值得临床推广应用。

Abstract:

Abstract:Objective To observe the efficacy of the introduction of medical skin care products into sensitive skin and the impact
on the quality of life of the soothing sensitive therapeutic instrument. Methods Total of 106 female patients with sensitive skin
who attended the dermatology department of our hospital from May 2019 to October 2020 were selected and divided into the
control group (n =53) and the observation group (n =53) according to the random number method. The control group was given
Winona soothing sensitive Moisturizing Cream, 2 times daily. On the basis of the control group, the observation group was
treated with Moisturizing Cream by the soothing sensitive therapeutic instrument, once a week. After 1 month of continuous
treatment, the clinical efficacy, skin lesion symptom score, skin physiological state, dermatology life quality index (DLQI) and
patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate of the observation group (92.45%)
was higher than that of the control group (73.58%), and the difference was statistically significant (P ＜0.05). After treatment,
the scores of itching, burning, tightness, erythema, scaly, and skin lesions area in the two groups were lower than those before
treatment, and the scores of the observation group was lower than those of the control group, the difference was statistically
significant (P ＜0.05). After treatment, the water content and oil content of the stratum corneum in the two groups were higher
than before treatment, and the observation group was higher than the control group, the transepidermal water loss of the two
groups was lower than before treatment, and the observation group was lower than the control group, the differences were
statistically significant (P ＜0.05). After treatment, the DLQI scores of the two groups were lower than before treatment, and the
scores of the observation group was lower than that of the control group, the satisfaction degree of the observation group (81.13%)
was higher than that of the control group (66.03%),and the differences were statistically significant (P ＜0.05). Conclusion The
treatment of sensitive skin by the soothing sensitive therapeutic instrument can significantly improve the clinical symptoms of
patients and the physiological state of the skin, reduce the impact of sensitive skin on the quality of life of patients, which is
comfortable, have high patient satisfaction and is worthy of clinical application.

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-08-03