«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:

期数:

2023年9期

页码:

148-151

栏目:

出版日期:

2023-09-10

文章信息/Info

Title:

Comparison of Application of Glass-ceramic All-ceramic Crown and Highpermeability Zirconia All-ceramic Crown in the Aesthetic Restoration of Anterior Teeth

文章编号:

1008-6455（2023）09-0148-04

作者:

蓝 熙; 廖 健; 刘 琴; 谭雯珈; 润 丹; 毛 岭

(贵州医科大学附属口腔医院修复种植科 贵州 贵阳 550004 )

Author(s):

LAN Xi; LIAO Jian; LIU Qin; TAN Wenjia; RUN Dan; MAO Ling

(Department of Restorative Implantology,Affi liated Stomatological Hospital of Guizhou Medical University,Guiyang 550004,Guizhou,China)

关键词:

玻璃陶瓷全瓷冠; 高透氧化锆全瓷冠; 前牙; 不良事件; 治疗满意度

Keywords:

glass-ceramic all-ceramic crown;  high-permeability zirconia all-ceramic crown;  anterior teeth;  adverse events;  treatment satisfaction

分类号:

R783.1

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

目的：分析玻璃陶瓷全瓷冠与高透氧化锆全瓷冠在前牙美学修复中的应用效果。方法：选取2018年6月-2020年6月行 前牙美容修复治疗的90例患者，根据修复体不同分为观察组（n=45，修复体63个）和对照组（n=45，修复体56个）。对照组 采用IPS e.max Press 玻璃陶瓷全瓷冠修复，观察组采用威兰德臻瓷（Zenostar Zirconia ）高透氧化锆全瓷冠修复。比较两 组修复体随访12个月时的不良事件发生情况及美观度，并记录两组患者治疗满意度。结果：随访12个月时，两组均获得良 好治疗效果，观察组修复体不良事件发生率为9.52%（6/63），对照组为7.14%（4/56），组间比较差异无统计学意义（P＞ 0.05 ），两组治疗1～6个月、7～12个月，修复体出现不良事件例数及不良事件类型比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；随 访12个月时，观察组未出现不良事件修复体的颜色匹配评分显著低于对照组（P＜0.05），两组未出现不良事件修复体的形 态匹配、继发龋、敏感、边缘适应性评分比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；随访12个月时，观察组患者的修复体颜色满 意度显著低于对照组，而两组患者的修复体形态及牙周组织健康状态满意度比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论：玻 璃陶瓷全瓷冠及高透氧化锆全瓷冠均可有效修复前牙缺损，两者在形态匹配、边缘适应性、牙龈敏感性等方面疗效相当，但 前者的颜色匹配度更佳，临床应根据患者实际情况选择治疗方式。

Abstract:

Objective To analyze the application effects of glass-ceramic all-ceramic crown and high-permeability zirconia all-ceramic crown in the aesthetic restoration of anterior teeth. Methods 90 patients who underwent anterior teeth aesthetic restoration were selected between June 2018 and June 2020, and they were divided into observation group (n=45, 63 restorations) and control group (n=45, 56 restorations). The control group was repaired with IPS e.max Press glass-ceramic all-ceramic crown, while the observation group was repaired with Zenostar Zirconia high-permeability zirconia all-ceramic crown. The occurrence of adverse events and aesthetic degree of the two groups of restorations were compared at 12 months of follow-up, and the treatment satisfaction was recorded in the two groups. Results At 12 months of follow-up, both groups achieved good treatment eff ects, and the incidence rate of restoration adverse events was 9.52% (6/63) in observation group and that in control group was 7.14% (4/56) (P＞0.05). During the treatment periods of 1-6 months and 7-12 months,there was no signifi cant diff erence in the number and type of adverse events between the two groups(P ＞0.05). At 12 months of follow-up, the score of color matching of restorations without adverse events in observation group was signifi cantly lower than that in control group (P ＜0.05), but there were no statistical diff erences in the scores of shape matching, secondary caries, sensitivity and edge adaptability of restorations without adverse events between the two groups (P ＞0.05). At 12 months of follow-up, the color satisfaction degree of restoration was signifi cantly lower in observation group than that in control group, but there were no statistical signifi cance in the satisfaction degrees of restoration shape and periodontal health status between the two groups (P ＞0.05). Conclusion Both glass-ceramic all-ceramic crown and high-permeability zirconia all-ceramic crown can eff ectively repair anterior teeth defects. The two have similar effi cacy in terms of shape matching, edge adaptability and gingival sensitivity, but the former one has better color matching, thus it is necessary to select the clinical treatment method according to the actual situation of patients.

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2023-10-16