[1]冯 丽.循证护理干预在预防乳腺下硅胶假体隆乳术后并发症中的作用及对术后效果的影响[J].中国美容医学,2018,(06):145-147.
　FENG Li.Application of Evidence-based Nursing Intervention in Prevention of Complications after Augmentation Mammoplasty with Silicone Prosthesis and its Effect on Aesthetic Effect[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(06):145-147.
点击复制

循证护理干预在预防乳腺下硅胶假体隆乳术后并发症中的作用及对术后效果的影响
()
分享到：

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:
期数:
2018年06期
页码:
145-147
栏目:
出版日期:
2018-07-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of Evidence-based Nursing Intervention in Prevention of Complications after Augmentation Mammoplasty with Silicone Prosthesis and its Effect on Aesthetic Effect
文章编号:
1008-6455（2018）06-0145-04
作者:
冯 丽
Author(s):
FENG Li
关键词:
[关键词]循证护理干预; 硅胶假体; 隆乳术; 乳腺下; 并发症; 美观效果
Keywords:
Key words: evidence-based nursing intervention;  silicone prosthesis;  augmentation mammoplasty;  submammary;  complications; appearance aesthetic effect
分类号:
R47
文献标志码:
B
摘要:
[摘要]目的：研究循证护理干预在预防乳腺下硅胶假体隆乳术后并发症的应用及对术后效果的影响。方法：选取2016年7
月-2017年7月在笔者医院接受乳腺下硅胶假体隆乳术的108例患者作为研究对象，参照随机数字表法分成对照组和研究组，每
组54例。对照组接受常规护理干预，研究组在对照组护理基础上开展循证护理干预。比较两组患者干预前后心理健康水平变化
及术后美观效果、并发症发生率。结果：干预后两组患者的SAS、SDS评分均低于干预前，且研究组低于对照组，差异有统计学
意义（P ＜0.05）。研究组术后美观效果为92.6%（50/54）优于对照组的77.8%（42/54），差异有统计学意义（P ＜0.05）。研
究组术后并发症总发生率为9.3%（5/54）低于对照组的25.9%（14/54），差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论：循证护理
干预在预防乳腺下硅胶假体隆乳术后并发症的应用效果显著，能有效减少术后并发症发生率，改善术后美观效果，提高患者
心理健康水平，值得临床推广应用。
Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To study the application of evidence-based nursing intervention in preventing complications after
augmentation mammoplasty with silicone prosthesis and its effect on aesthetic effect. Methods 108 patients who received
augmentation mammoplasty with silicone prosthesis in our hospital from July 2016 to July 2017 were selected as research subjects.
All the patients were divided into the control group and the study group according to random number table method, 54 cases in each
group. The patients in the control group were given routine nursing interventions, and the study group were given evidence-based
nursing intervention on the basis of the control group. The changes of mental health and external aesthetic effect and the incidence of
complications before and after intervention were compared between the two groups. Results After intervention, the SAS and SDS
scores of the two groups were lower than those before intervention, and the study group was lower than that of the control group, the
differences were statistically significant(P＜0.05). The postoperative aesthetic effect of the study group was 92.6%(50/54), which was
better than that of the control group (77.8%,40/54,P＜0.05). The total incidence of postoperative complications in the study group
was 9.3% (5/54), which was lower than that in the control group(25.9%,14/54,P ＜0.05). Conclusion Evidence-based nursing
intervention has a significant effect on preventing postoperative complications after augmentation mammoplasty with silicone
prosthesis. It can effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, improve the postoperative aesthetic effect and
improve the mental health of the patients. It is worthy of clinical application.

相似文献/References:

[1]潘小欢,伍艳群,胡文辉,等. 假体隆乳术后乳房按摩预防Ⅲ/Ⅳ包膜挛缩的回顾性研究[J].中国美容医学,2018,(04):1.
　PAN Xiao-huan,WU Yan-qun,HU Wen-hui,et al. Retrospective Study on Breast Massage Prevention Ⅲ/Ⅳ Capsular Contracture[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(06):1.
[2]薛美思,张 强,梁发贵,等. 假体隆颏联合颏肌放松治疗轻中度小颏畸形疗效观察[J].中国美容医学,2018,(07):112.
　XUE Mei-si,ZHANG Qiang,LIANG Fa-gui,et al. Clinical Observation of ChinAugmentation Combined with Mentalis Relaxation inTreatment of Mild to Moderate Chin Microsomia[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(06):112.
[3]陈 静,王少强,樊菁菁,等. 经乳晕切口切除乳腺良性病变同期行隆乳术的效果观察[J].中国美容医学,2019,(02):29.
　CHEN Jing,WANG Shao-qiang,FAN Jing-jing,et al. Effect Observation of Augmentation Mammaplasty after the Resection of the BenignBreast Lesions through Periareolar Incision[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(06):29.
[4]韩佳南,张丽丽,刘 鑫,等. 循证护理干预对口腔正畸患儿治疗依从性和预后的影响[J].中国美容医学,2019,(02):147.
　HAN Jia-nan,ZHANG Li-li,LIU Xin,et al. Effect of Evidence-based Nursing Intervention on Compliance and Prognosis ofChildren with Oral Orthodontics[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(06):147.
[5]李盛华,陈志鹏,丁祖烈,等.自体耳软骨联合硅胶假体隆鼻的美观效果及恢复速度观察[J].中国美容医学,2019,(05):29.
　LI Sheng-hua,CHEN Zhi-peng,DING Zu-lie,et al.Observation on the Aesthetic Effect and Recovery Rate of Augmentation Rhinoplastywith Autogenous Ear Cartilage Combined with Silicone Prosthesis[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(06):29.
[6]高 扬,石玉琦,杨兴春,等. 膨体聚四氟乙烯与硅胶假体隆鼻效果比较[J].中国美容医学,2019,(12):39.
　GAO Yang,SHI Yu-qi,YANG Xing-chun,et al. Comparison of Augmentation Rhinoplasty Effect between ExpandedPolytetrafluoroethylene and Silicone Prosthesis[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(06):39.
[7]张庆卫,王成元,张顺生,等. 自体肋软骨联合硅胶假体在短鼻畸形修复中的应用研究[J].中国美容医学,2020,(3):35.
　ZHANG Qing-wei,WANG Cheng-yuan,ZHANG Shun-sheng,et al. Application of Autogenous Costal Cartilage Combined with Silica Gel Prosthesis inthe Repair of Short Nose Deformity[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2020,(06):35.
[8]杨 成,李正勇,刘睿奇. 肋软骨与耳软骨联合硅胶假体隆鼻效果比较[J].中国美容医学,2020,(4):28.
　YANG Cheng,LI Zheng-yong,LIU Rui-qi.Comparison of Clinical Effects of Costal Cartilage and Auricular Cartilage Combinedwith Silicone Prosthesis in Rhinoplasty[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2020,(06):28.
[9]张承武,胡 金,杨宏刚,等.硅胶假体联合脱细胞异体真皮基质行鼻整形的效果分析[J].中国美容医学,2023,(2):28.
　ZHANG Chengwu,HU Jin,YANG Honggang,et al.Analysis of the Effect of Silicone Prosthesis Combined with Acellular Allogeneic Dermal Matrix for Rhinoplasty[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2023,(06):28.
[10]马士辉,凌飞海,崔世恩,等.扩张器置换硅胶假体在乳腺癌切除术后乳房再造中的应用[J].中国美容医学,2023,(2):51.
　MA Shihui,LING Feihai,CUI Shien,et al.Application of Dilator-assisted Silicone Prosthesis Replacement in Breast Reconstruction after Breast Cancer Resection[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2023,(06):51.

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-08-10