[1]吴志贤,莫自增,李 响,等. 负压伤口疗法结合邮票植皮术与传统换药植皮术修复糖尿病足溃疡临床疗效比较[J].中国美容医学,2019,(09):65-67.
　WU Zhi-xian,MO Zi-zeng,LI Xiang,et al. Comparison of the Clinical Effect Between the Negative Pressure Wound Therapywith Postage Stamp Grafting and Conventional Skin Grafting in the Treatment ofDiabetic Foot Ulcers[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(09):65-67.
点击复制

 负压伤口疗法结合邮票植皮术与传统换药植皮术修复糖尿病足溃疡临床疗效比较
()
分享到：

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:
期数:
2019年09期
页码:
65-67
栏目:
出版日期:
2019-09-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Comparison of the Clinical Effect Between the Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
with Postage Stamp Grafting and Conventional Skin Grafting in the Treatment of
Diabetic Foot Ulcers
文章编号:
1008-6455（2019）09-0065-03
作者:
吴志贤; 莫自增; 李 响; 梁 杰
Author(s):
WU Zhi-xian; MO Zi-zeng; LI Xiang; LIANG Jie
关键词:
[关键词]糖尿病; 糖尿病足; 溃疡; 负压伤口疗法; 皮片移植术
Keywords:
Key words: diabetes;  diabetic foot;  ulceration;  negative pressure wound therapy;  skin grafting
分类号:
R622
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
[摘要]目的：比较负压伤口疗法结合邮票植皮术与传统换药植皮在糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的疗效。方法：回顾性分析2010年1
月-2016年1月收治的糖尿病足溃疡Wagner分级3～4级49例患者，根据治疗方法的不同分为负压治疗组25例和传统换药组24
例，在控制血糖，控制感染，营养神经、改善微循环等支持治疗协助下，予以创面清创，负压治疗组采用负压伤口疗法+邮
票游离移植技术，传统换药组采用换药方法+薄中厚皮片移植修复，比较两组患者创面床的准备时间、住院时间。结果：49
例患者治疗后创面均愈合出院，负压治疗组创面床准备时间及住院时间为（11.80±3.35）d、（27.12±8.21）d，传统换药
组为（17.87±4.54）d、（45.00±10.60）d，组间比较差异有统计学意义（P ＜0.01）。结论：与传统换药植皮治疗方法相
比，负压治疗组创面床准备时间及住院时间均明显缩短，且减少了换药工作量，操作简单。

Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To compare the clinical effect between the negative pressure wound therapy with postage stamp grafting
and conventional skin grafting in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Methods A retrospective study of 49 patients with
diabetic foot ulcers wagner class 3-4 who were hospitalized between January 2010 to January 2016. According to the different
treatment methods, they were divided into the two groups, the negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT）group 25 cases
and the traditional treatment(TDT) group 24 cases. Based on glycemic control, infection control and helping of neurotrophy
medicine and improving microcirculation medicine and other supporting treatment, radical debridement was performed. The
NPWT group used the negative pressure wound therapy + postage stamp grafting technology, The TDT group treated with
conventional wound dressing and thin split thickness skin graft methods. Clinical results were assessed by comparing the
preparation time of the wound bed and the hospital stays length between the two groups. Results The wound of 49 cases of
patients were healing discharged after treatment. The preparation time and hospitalization time of wound bed in the NPWT
group were (11.80±3.35)d,(27.12±8.21)d, in the TDT group were(17.87±4.54)d,(45.00±10.60)d, there were significant
differences between groups(P ＜0.01). Conclusion Compared with the TDT group, the preparation time and hospitalization
time of wound bed in the NPWT group were significantly shortened, and the workload of dressing change was reduced, and the
operation was simple.

相似文献/References:

[1]张春月,廖 毅. rhGM-CSF与胰岛素联合应用对糖尿病大鼠烫伤创面TGF-β1和FGF-2表达的影响[J].中国美容医学,2018,(06):45.
　TGF- and FGF- in Wound Healing with Degree Deep Scald in Diabetic Rats ZHANG Chun-yue,LIAO Yi. Influence of Local Application of rhGM-CSF Mixed Insulin on the Expression of TGF-β1 and FGF-2 in Wound Healing with Ⅱ Degree Deep Scald in Diabetic Rats[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(09):45.
[2]梁其国,赵遵江,张保德,等. 湿性敷料联合光子治疗对糖尿病足患者创面愈合的影响[J].中国美容医学,2018,(08):59.
　LIANG Qi-guo,ZHAO Zun-jiang,ZHANG Bao-de,et al. The Effect of Wet Dressing Combined with Photon Therapy on Wound Healing of Diabetic Foot Patients[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(09):59.
[3]黄祖根,吴杉英,雷 忱. 清创术联合负压封闭引流技术治疗糖尿病足创面的临床观察[J].中国美容医学,2018,(12):36.
　HUANG Zu-gen,WU Shan-ying,LEI Chen. Observation of Debridement Combined with Vacuum Sealing Drainage in Treating Diabetic Foot Wounds[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(09):36.
[4]张慜晨 综述,高伟成 审校. 糖尿病难愈创面新生血管形成的基础研究进展[J].中国美容医学,2019,(05):166.
　ZHANG Min-chen,GAO Wei-cheng. Advances in Basic Research Progress on Neovascularization of Diabetic Wound[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(09):166.
[5]鲍 琼,李红红. 人工真皮联合负压引流技术修复糖尿病足创面的疗效研究[J].中国美容医学,2019,(06):85.
　BAO Qiong,LI Hong-hong.Analysis of Curative Effect in Patients with Diabetic Foot Wounds by DermagraftCombined with Vacuum Assisted Drainage[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(09):85.
[6]杨晓敏,徐婷婷,段迎晓.不同负压创面治疗技术对糖尿病足的修复效果比较[J].中国美容医学,2023,(1):38.
　YANG Xiaomin,XU Tingting,DUAN Yingxiao.Comparison of Different Negative Pressure Wound Therapyin the Repair of Diabetes Foot[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2023,(09):38.
[7]韦礼永,韦仁杰,黄大波.PRP局部注射联合局部氧疗治疗Wagner分级2～4级糖尿病足疗效观察[J].中国美容医学,2024,(2):38.[doi:10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.006138]
　WEI Liyong,WEI Renjie,HUANG Dabo.Clinical Effi cacy of the Treatment of Wagner Classifi cation 2-4 Diabetic Foot Wound with the Combination of PRP Local Injection and Local Oxygen Therapy?/html>[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2024,(09):38.[doi:10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.006138]

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-09-24