[1]黄祖根,吴杉英,雷 忱. 清创术联合负压封闭引流技术治疗糖尿病足创面的临床观察[J].中国美容医学,2018,(12):36-39.
　HUANG Zu-gen,WU Shan-ying,LEI Chen. Observation of Debridement Combined with Vacuum Sealing Drainage in Treating Diabetic Foot Wounds[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(12):36-39.
点击复制

 清创术联合负压封闭引流技术治疗糖尿病足创面的临床观察
()
分享到：

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:
期数:
2018年12期
页码:
36-39
栏目:
出版日期:
2018-12-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Observation of Debridement Combined with Vacuum Sealing Drainage in Treating Diabetic Foot Wounds
文章编号:
1008-6455（2018）12-0036-04
作者:
黄祖根; 吴杉英; 雷 忱
Author(s):
HUANG Zu-gen; WU Shan-ying; LEI Chen
关键词:
[关键词]清创术; 负压封闭引流; 糖尿病足; 植皮; 并发症
Keywords:
Key words: debridement;  vacuum sealing drainage;  diabetic foot;  skin grafting;  complication
分类号:
R622
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
[摘要]目的：探讨清创术联合负压封闭引流（Vacuum sealing drainage，VSD）技术治疗糖尿病足创面的临床疗效。方法：
对2015年7月-2017年7月笔者科室收治的68例糖尿病足患者进行研究，随机分为观察组及对照组各34例。观察组采用清创术
联合VSD技术进行治疗，对照组采用清创术联合普通敷料定期换药治疗，对比两组患者创面愈合时间、换药次数及并发症发
生率等情况。结果：68例患者经治疗观察，观察组患者22例经VSD治疗后直接愈合，12例经VSD治疗后二期植皮愈合，出现皮
片移位1例，并发症发生率为2.9%，创面愈合时间为（34.0±4.5）d，平均换药次数为（7.6±1.5）次；对照组患者20例经
普通敷料定期换药后愈合，14例经换药后二期植皮愈合，出现创面感染2例，创面积液1例，皮片移位3例，并发症发生率为
17.6%，创面愈合时间为（65.0±7.8）d，平均换药次数为（35.0±3.8）次。观察组与对照组在创面愈合时间及平均换药次
数比较，差异均具有统计学意义（P ＜0.05）。结论：清创术联合VSD技术治疗糖尿病足创面临床效果良好，相比传统方式愈
合更快，换药次数更少，并发症发生率更低，操作简便且安全有效，值得临床应用。

Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To investigate the effect of debridement combined with vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) in treating
diabetic foot wounds. Methods 68 diabetic foot patients admitted to our department from July 2015 to July 2017 were
randomly divided into the observation group and the control group, 34 cases in each group. The observation group was treated
by debridement combined with VSD technology, while the control group was treated with debridement combined with regular
dressing. The differences in wound healing time, frequency of dressing change and incidence of complications between the two
groups were compared. Results All patients were treated and observed. In the observation group, 22 cases were healed directly
after VSD treatment, 12 cases were healed by second-stage skin grafting after VSD treatment. Skin graft displacement occurred
in one case. The incidence of complications was 2.9%. The wound healing time was (34.0±4.5)d, and the average change times
were (7.6±1.5)times. In the control group, 20 cases were healed after regular dressing change, 14 cases of skin grafting after
two stages of change of medicine. Wound infection occurred in 2 cases, wound area fluid in one case, skin flap displacement
in 3 cases, the incidence of complications was 17.6%. The wound healing time was (65.0±7.8)d, and the average change times
was (35.0±3.8)times. The difference of the wound healing time and the average change times in the observation group and
the control group were statistically significant(P ＜0.05). Conclusion The effect of debridement combined with VSD in the
treatment of diabetic foot wound is better. It is faster than the traditional way of healing, less change times, lower complication
rate, easy operation and safe and effective. It is worthy of clinical application.

相似文献/References:

[1]白燕玲,冯艳玲,邓小芬. 结构化管理模式在小腿皮肤软组织撕脱伤VSD干预中的应用[J].中国美容医学,2019,(05):154.
　BAI Yan-ling,FENG Yan-ling,DENG Xiao-fen. Application of Structured Management Model in VSD Intervention for Skin and Soft Tissue Avulsion Injury of Leg[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(12):154.
[2] 米增法. 下腹部带蒂超薄皮瓣修复术联合负压封闭引流治疗手部热压伤[J].中国美容医学,2020,(9):74.
　 MI Zeng-fa. Observation on the Curative Effect of Pedicled Ultra-thin Flap Repair of the LowerAbdomen Combined with Vacumm Sealing Drainage Technique in the Treatment ofHot Pressure Injury of Hand[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2020,(12):74.
[3] 梁 云,张国安. 亲水性纤维含银敷料联合负压封闭引流对深Ⅱ度烧伤创面愈合及VEGF的影响[J].中国美容医学,2020,(11):38.
　 LIANG Yun,ZHANG Guo-an. Effect of Hydrophilic Fiber Silver Dressing Combined with Vacuum Sealing Drainageon Wound Healing and VEGF in Patients with Deep Second Degree Burn[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2020,(12):38.
[4] 王洁瑜,杨 阳,陆兰云. 综合护理干预在负压封闭引流治疗撕裂伤创面中的应用[J].中国美容医学,2021,(2):163.
　 WANG Jie-yu,YANG Yang,LU Lan-yun. Application of Comprehensive Nursing Intervention in the Treatment of LaceratedWound with Vacuum Sealing Drainage[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2021,(12):163.
[5] 李 晴,于文君,刘鹏程,等. 自体皮肤回植联合负压封闭引流修复皮肤撕脱伤的疗效及影响因素分析[J].中国美容医学,2021,(9):41.
　 LI Qing,YU Wen-jun,LIU Peng-cheng,et al. Analysis of Curative Effect and Influencing Factors of Autologous Skin ReplantationCombined with Vacuum Sealing Drainage to Repair Skin Avulsion Injury[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2021,(12):41.
[6]徐 敏,郭忠梁,罗长生.局部氧疗联合负压封闭引流治疗皮肤深Ⅱ度损伤的疗效探讨[J].中国美容医学,2022,(5):53.
　XU Min,GUO Zhongliang,LUO Changsheng.Effect of Topical Oxygen Therapy Combined with Vacuum Sealing Drainage in the Treatment of Deep Second-degree Skin Injury[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2022,(12):53.
[7]颉黄峰,陈 骅,戴如冰,等.削痂植皮术联合负压封闭引流治疗中度烧伤创面的临床效果观察[J].中国美容医学,2022,(6):70.
　JIE Huangfeng,CHEN Hua,DAI Rubing,et al.Clinical Effects of Tangential Excision and Skin Grafting Combined with Vacuum Sealing Drainage in the Treatment of Moderate Burn Wounds[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2022,(12):70.
[8]李明霞.VAC联合植皮修复儿童下肢大面积皮肤缺损[J].中国美容医学,2022,(6):74.
　LI Mingxia.Clinical Effect of VAC Combined with Skin Grafting in Repairing Large Skin Defects of Lower Limbs in Children[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2022,(12):74.
[9]孙 诚,张茂红,孙丰华.人工真皮联合VSD及自体刃厚皮片移植治疗烧伤后瘢痕增生的疗效及影响因素分析[J].中国美容医学,2022,(8):52.
　SUN Cheng,ZHANG Maohong,SUN Fenghua.Effect and Influencing Factors of Artificial Dermis Combined with VSD and Autologous Blade Thickness Skin Grafting in the Treatment of Scar Hyperplasia after Burn[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2022,(12):52.
[10]杨晓敏,徐婷婷,段迎晓.不同负压创面治疗技术对糖尿病足的修复效果比较[J].中国美容医学,2023,(1):38.
　YANG Xiaomin,XU Tingting,DUAN Yingxiao.Comparison of Different Negative Pressure Wound Therapyin the Repair of Diabetes Foot[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2023,(12):38.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-01-08