[1] 张 菊,税 方,何 谦,等. 个性化访谈结合团体活动护理模式对烧伤患者术后恢复效果及满意度的影响[J].中国美容医学,2020,(8):170-173.
　 ZHANG Ju,SHUI Fang,HE Qian,et al. Effect of Personalized Interview Combined with Group Activity Nursing Mode onPostoperative Recovery and Satisfaction in Burn Patients[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2020,(8):170-173.
点击复制

 个性化访谈结合团体活动护理模式对烧伤患者术后恢复效果及
满意度的影响
()
分享到：

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:
期数:
2020年8期
页码:
170-173
栏目:
出版日期:
2020-08-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Effect of Personalized Interview Combined with Group Activity Nursing Mode on
Postoperative Recovery and Satisfaction in Burn Patients
文章编号:
1008-6455（2020）08-0170-04
作者:
 张 菊1; 税 方1; 何 谦1; 冯素英2; 陈 滟3
Author(s):
 ZHANG Ju1; SHUI Fang1; HE Qian1; FENG Su-ying2; CHEN Yan3
关键词:
 [关键词]中重度烧伤; 心理干预; 个性化访谈; 团体活动; 疼痛; 焦虑; 抑郁; 生活质量
Keywords:
 Key words: moderate to severe burns;  psychological intervention;  personalized interview;  group activity;  pain;  anxiety; depression;  quality of life
分类号:
R473.6
文献标志码:
B
摘要:

[摘要]目的：探究个性化访谈和团体活动两种心理干预措施对烧伤患者术后疼痛情况、自我效能感评分及患者满意度的影
响。方法：将70例患者随机分为两组，各35例，对照组采用常规舒适护理模式，观察组则实施个性化访谈结合团体活动进行
护理。比较两组疼痛评分、焦虑抑郁评分及患者满意度等情况。结果：观察组患者的疼痛评分明显低于对照组，观察组患
者的一般自我效能感评分(General self-efficacy scale，GSES)明显高于对照组，差异均有统计学意义（P ＜0.05）。干
预后两组汉密顿焦虑量表（Hamilton anxiety scale，HAMA）和汉密顿抑郁量表（Hamilton depression scale，HAMD）评
分明显下降，且观察组评分明显低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P ＜0.05）。两组生活质量综合评定问卷-74评分(Generic
quality of life inventory-74,GQOL-74)明显上升，且观察组评分显著高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P ＜0.05）。观察
组满意度为94.3%（33/35）高于对照组的74.3%（26/35），差异有统计学意义（P ＜0.05）。结论：对烧伤患者采用个性化
访谈结合团体活动护理模式能降低患者的疼痛程度，提高生活质量及患者满意度，值得在临床上推广应用。

Abstract:

Abstract: Objective The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of personalized interview combined with group
activity nursing mode on postoperative pain, self-effi cacy score and patient satisfaction in burn patients. Methods 70 patients
treated in the burn unit were randomly divided into two groups, 35 in each group. The control group adopted the conventional
comfort care mode, while the observation group implemented personalized interview combined with group activities for
nursing. The pain score, anxiety and depression score and patients’ satisfaction were compared between the two groups.
Results The pain score of the observation group was signifi cantly lower than that of the control group, and GSES score of the
observation group was signifi cantly higher than that of the control group(P ＜0.05). After intervention, the scores of HAMA and
HAMD decreased signifi cantly in the two groups, and the score of the observation group was signifi cantly lower than thoseof
the control group(P ＜0.05). The GQOL-74 score of the two groups increased signifi cantly, and the score of the observation
group was signifi cantly higher than that of the control group(P ＜0.05). The satisfaction rate of the observation group was 94.3%
(33/35) higher than that of the control group (74.3%, 26/35, P ＜0.05). Conclusion Personalized interview combined with
group activity nursing mode can reduce the degree of pain, improve the quality of life and patients’ satisfaction, which is worthy
of clinical application.

相似文献/References:

[1]严 涛,包香兰,陈卫华,等.Roy适应模式对鼻综合整形患者术后睡眠水平的影响[J].中国美容医学,2018,(06):148.
　YAN Tao,BAO Xiang-lan,CHEN Wei-hua,et al.Effect of Roy-adaptive Mode on Postoperative Sleep Level of Patients with Nasal Plastic Surgery[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(8):148.
[2]崔太安,唐林俊,李献和. 显微外科在手术截肢创面修复中的应用效果研究[J].中国美容医学,2018,(08):70.
　CUI Tai-an,TANG Lin-jun,LI Xian-he. Clinical Effect of Microsurgery in the Repair of Amputated Wounds[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(8):70.
[3] 刘 英,杨艳清,李慧娟,等. 普里西特干预对已婚女性外阴整形术后生活质量的影响[J].中国美容医学,2020,(12):166.
　 LIU Ying,YANG Yan-qing,LI Lui-juan,et al. Effect of Permission, Limited Information, Specific Suggestion, Intensive Therapy onQuality of Life of Married Women after Vulvar Plastic Surgery[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2020,(8):166.
[4] 张 旭,秦 文,孙唯夫,等. 突发公共卫生事件下的口腔正畸临床诊疗管理[J].中国美容医学,2021,(9):160.
　 ZHANG Xu,QIN Wen,SUN Wei-fu,et al. Management of Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Orthodontics in Public HealthEmergencies[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2021,(8):160.
[5] 王海梅,蔡艳丽,李 燕,等. PERMA模式下心理干预在烧伤瘢痕修复术中的应用[J].中国美容医学,2021,(10):167.
　 WANG Hai-mei,CAI Yan-li,LI Yan,et al. Application of Psychological Intervention Under PERMA Mode in Patients with BurnScars Repair[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2021,(8):167.
[6]王 莲,邓 巍,刘晨晨,等.个性化护理沟通模式及心理干预在面部软组织损伤患者整形修复治疗中的应用[J].中国美容医学,2022,(4):151.
　WANG Lian,DENG Wei,LIU Chenchen,et al.Application of Personalized Nursing Communication Mode and Psychological Intervention in the Plastic Repair Teratment of Patients with Facial Soft Tissue Injury[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2022,(8):151.
[7]伍翠云,查大慧,程晶晶,等.心理干预配合综合护理对颌面外伤整形患者术后康复的作用[J].中国美容医学,2023,(3):176.
　WU Cuiyun,ZHA Dahui,CHENG Jingjing,et al.Effect of Psychological Intervention Combined with Comprehensive Nursing on Postoperative Rehabilitation of Patients with Maxillofacial Trauma and Plastic Surgery[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2023,(8):176.
[8]余 雪,赵飞龙,宫青香.基于希望与失望学说理论的心理干预对烧伤患者心理状态的影响[J].中国美容医学,2023,(4):173.
　YU Xue,ZHAO Feilong,GONG Qingxiang.Effects of Psychological Intervention Based on Hope and Disappointment Theory on the Psychological State in Burn Patients[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2023,(8):173.
[9]杨 洁,王 萌,李 辉.两种不同心理护理方法对乳腺癌患者术后心理状态和生活质量的影响[J].中国美容医学,2023,(9):180.[doi:10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.005866]
　YANG Jie,WANG Meng,LI Hui.Infl uence of Two Different Psychological Nursing Methods on Postoperative Recovery of Breast Cancer Patients[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2023,(8):180.[doi:10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.005866]

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-09-01