[1] 曹 磊. 即刻种植和延期种植在单颗牙修复患者中应用效果研究[J].中国美容医学,2020,(10):130-133.
　 CAO Lei. Study on the Efficacy of Immediate and Delayed Implantation in Patients with SingleTooth Implantation[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2020,(10):130-133.
点击复制

 即刻种植和延期种植在单颗牙修复患者中应用效果研究
()
分享到：

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:
期数:
2020年10期
页码:
130-133
栏目:
出版日期:
2020-10-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Study on the Efficacy of Immediate and Delayed Implantation in Patients with Single
Tooth Implantation
文章编号:
1008-6455（2020）10-0130-04
作者:
 曹 磊
Author(s):
 CAO Lei
关键词:
 [关键词]即刻种植; 延期种植; 单颗牙种植; 边缘骨吸收; 牙周探诊深度; 锥形束CT
Keywords:
 Key words: immediate implantation;  delayed implantation;  single tooth implantation;  marginal bone loss;  periodontal probingdepth;  Cone beam CT
分类号:
R782.12
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
[摘要]目的：探讨即刻种植和延期种植在单颗牙种植中的应用价值。方法：选择2013年3月-2018年3月于笔者医院就诊的需
行种植牙治疗的500例患者为研究对象，患者均为单颗牙种植修复，其中即刻种植患者250例，延期种植患者250例。即刻种
植组在拔牙即刻行种植术，延期种植术在拔牙后6个月行种植术，术后均随访12个月。回顾性分析两组患者术后种植体成功
率、PD、改良菌斑指数（mPL1）、改良龈沟出血指数（mBI）、红色美学（PES）评分、种植体边缘骨吸收量及不良反应发
生率。结果：两组患者种植术后3、6、9、12个月的种植体成功率无统计学差异（P ＞0.05）；两组患者种植术后12个月的
PD、mPL1、mBI水平无统计学差异（P ＞0.05）；即刻种植组术后3个月、6个月PES评分高于延期种植组（P ＜0.05）；即
刻种植组术后3个月、6个月种植体边缘骨吸收量小于延期种植组（P ＜0.05）；两组患者种植术后不良反应发生率无统计
学差异（P ＞0.05）。结论：即刻种植与延期种植在单颗牙种植患者中成功率、PD无明显差异，而即刻种植短期内边缘骨吸
收更小，美观性更好。
Abstract:
Abstract: Objective To study application value of immediate implantation and delayed implantation in single tooth
implantation. Methods 500 patients who were treated in the hospital and needed tooth implantation during the period from
March 2013 to March 2018 were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent single tooth implantation repair,including
250 cases undergoing immediate implantation and 250 cases undergoing delayed implantation. The immediate implantation
group was given implantation immediately after tooth extraction, while delayed implantation group was given implantation
at 6 months after tooth extraction. All patients were followed up for 12 months. The success rate of postoperative implant,
PD, modified plaque index (mPL1), modification sulcus bleeding index (mBI), pink esthetic score (PES) , volume of implant
marginal bone loss, and incidence of adverse reactions in both groups were statistically analyzed. Results There was no
significant difference in success rate of implant between the two groups at 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months after
implantation (P ＞0.05). There was no significant difference in PD, mPL1 or mBI level between the two groups at 12 months
after implantation (P ＞0.05). At 3 months and 6 months after surgery, PES scores of immediate implantation group were higher
than those of delayed implantation group (P ＜0.05), while volume of implant marginal bone loss was less than that of delayed
implantation group (P ＜0.05). There was no significant difference in incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups
after implantation (P ＞0.05). Conclusion There is no significant difference in the success rate of single tooth implantation and
PD between immediate implantation and delayed implantation. The marginal bone loss of the former is less in the short term,
and aesthetic property is better.

相似文献/References:

[1]马 宁,于 春,刘海鹏. 牙周生物型对美学区同期行引导骨再生术延期种植的红白美学效果影响[J].中国美容医学,2019,(01):138.
　MA Ning,YU Chun,LIU Hai-peng. Effects of Periodontal Biotypes on the Red-White Aesthetic Effect of the DelayedPlanting of Bone Regeneration in the Aesthetic Zone[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(10):138.
[2]龙 杨,张彩霞,赵 睿.引导骨再生术对不同牙龈生物型种植红白美学效果影响的研究[J].中国美容医学,2019,(06):115.
　LONG Yang,ZHANG Cai-xia,ZHAO Rui. Study on the Effect of Guided Bone Regeneration on the Aesthetics of Red AndWhite in Different Gingival Biotypes[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(10):115.
[3]裴晓庆,王 男,李志刚.上颌前牙区即刻种植术后患者牙槽骨丰隆度与牙龈形态恢复的情况分析[J].中国美容医学,2019,(12):129.
　PEI Xiao-qing,WANG Nan,LI Zhi-gang. Analysis of Alveolar Bone Augmentation and Gingival Morphology Recovery afterImmediate Implantation in Anterior Region of Maxilla[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(10):129.
[4] 李惠玲,杨艳兰. 美学区单颗牙即刻种植与延期种植修复效果的临床对比研究[J].中国美容医学,2020,(8):149.
　 LI Hui-ling,YANG Yan-lan. Clinical Comparative Study on the Prosthetic Effect of Immediate Implantion andDelayed Implantion on Single Tooth in Aesthetic Area[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2020,(10):149.
[5] 范孟钊,国正则,侯新华,等. 前牙即刻种植修复对外伤脱落牙患者美学修复效果的影响[J].中国美容医学,2020,(10):123.
　 FAN Meng-zhao,GUO Zheng-ze,HOU Xin-hua,et al. Effect of Immediate Implant Aesthetic Restoration Technology on AestheticRestoration Effect and Vertical Absorption Degree of Alveolar Bone in Patients withSingle Anterior Teeth Trauma[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2020,(10):123.
[6] 罗纯锐. 对比即刻种植与常规种植对牙齿缺失患者修复及美学效果的影响[J].中国美容医学,2021,(7):128.
　 LUO Chun-rui. Compare the Effects of Immediate Dental Implantation and Conventional DentalImplantation on Implant Restoration Effect and Aesthetic Effect in Patients with Missing Teeth[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2021,(10):128.
[7] 陈音音,郭泽清,庄燕茹. 微创拔牙即刻种植即刻修复对上颌中切牙美学效果和唇侧骨板改建的影响[J].中国美容医学,2021,(8):119.
　 CHEN Yin-yin,GUO Ze-qing,ZHUANG Yan-ru. Effect of Immediate Implantation and Immediate Repair after Minimally InvasiveTooth Extraction on Aesthetic Effect of Maxillary Central Incisor and Reconstructionof Labial Bone Plate[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2021,(10):119.
[8]杜 军,万 哲,邱延菊.上颌中切牙即刻种植和位点保存延期种植的疗效及对红白美学效果的影响[J].中国美容医学,2022,(11):137.
　 DU Jun,WAN Zhe,QIU Yanju.Effect of Immediate Implant and Site Preservation Delayed Implant in Patients with Maxillary Central Incisor Implantation and Its Infl uence on the Aesthetic Effect of Red and White[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2022,(10):137.
[9]孙美杰,祝清晨,房 进.上颌中切牙区即刻与延期种植术中唇侧骨量与美学效果对比研究[J].中国美容医学,2022,(12):103.
　 SUN Meijie,ZHU Qingchen,FANG Jin.Comparison of the Effect of Immediate and Delayed Implants in the Maxillary Central Incisor Area on the Labial Bone Mass and Aesthetics[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2022,(10):103.

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-10-30