[1]谢 琦,陈 宇,史克佳.微种植体支抗与传统支抗对安氏Ⅱ类错牙合畸形上颌前牙内收 的临床效果评价[J].中国美容医学,2022,(6):102-105.
　XIE Qi,CHEN Yu,SHI Kejia.Clinical Evaluation of Microimplant Anchorage and Traditional Anchorage in Treatment of Class Malocclusion with Adduction of Maxillary Anterior Teeth[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2022,(6):102-105.
点击复制

微种植体支抗与传统支抗对安氏Ⅱ类错牙合畸形上颌前牙内收 的临床效果评价()
分享到：

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:
期数:
2022年6期
页码:
102-105
栏目:
出版日期:
2022-06-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical Evaluation of Microimplant Anchorage and Traditional Anchorage in Treatment of Class Malocclusion with Adduction of Maxillary Anterior Teeth
文章编号:
1008-6455(2022)06-0102-04
作者:
谢 琦; 陈 宇; 史克佳
(廊坊市人民医院口腔科 河北 廊坊 065000 )
Author(s):
XIE Qi; CHEN Yu; SHI Kejia
(Department of Stomatology,Langfang People’s Hospital,Langfang 065000,Hebei,China)
关键词:
微种植体; 横腭杆; 支抗; 安式Ⅱ类错牙合畸形; 上颌前牙内收?/html>
Keywords:
mini-implant;  transpalatal arch;  anchorage;  Angle Class malocclusion;  retraction of anterior upper teeth
分类号:
R783.5
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：比较微种植体支抗与传统支抗辅助两步法滑动关闭间隙对安氏Ⅱ类错牙合畸形上颌前牙内收的临床效果。方法： 选取200例安氏Ⅱ类1分类错牙合畸形患者，将其随机分成两组，根据所用支抗类型的不同分为对照组（n=100，微种植体支 抗）和治疗组（n=100，横腭杆支抗），并采用两步法滑动关闭间隙，在X线头影测量片中对上颌切牙切缘和第一磨牙的前后 位移进行评估。结果：相比于横腭杆支抗（Transpalatal arch,TPA）组，微种植体支抗两步法滑动关闭间隙对上颌前牙的 整体内收量和压低量分别增加了4.42 mm和1.53 mm，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.001）。结论：对于中至重度安氏Ⅱ类错牙合畸 形患者，微种植体支抗相比于传统支抗在内收上颌前牙的过程中其内收效果更好。?/html>
Abstract:
Objective Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) has been designed to compare treatment outcomes between retraction of anterior upper teeth supported by mini-implants and the two-step sliding retraction technique employing conventional anchorage devices. Methods Select 200 patients with Class Ⅱ malocclusion and randomly divide them into two groups. According to the diff erent types of anchorage used, they were respectively named with control group (n=100, micro-implant anchorage) and the treatment group (n=100, traditional anchorage), and the two-step sliding retraction technique was used to retraction of anterior upper teeth, the anteroposterior displacement of the incisor margin of the maxillary incisor and the fi rst molar were evaluated in the X-ray cephalometric fi lm. Results Compared with the transpalatal arch (TPA) anchorage group, a bodily retraction and depress of the maxillary anterior teeth in the mini-implants group increased by 4.42 mm and 1.53 mm (P ＜0.001). Conclusion For patients with moderate to severe Angle Class Ⅱ malocclusion, the mini-implant anchorage has a better retraction of anterior upper teeth eff ect compared to TPA anchorage.

相似文献/References:

[1]邱伟芳,江飞宇,何学君.两种不同矫治器结合微种植体矫治上颌前突临床研究[J].中国美容医学,2018,(06):94.
　QIU Wei-fang,JIANG Fei-yu,HE Xue-jun. Clinical Study on Two Different Appliances Combined with Implant of Anchorage for Maxillary Protrusion[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(6):94.
[2]吴 渊,高 杨. 安氏Ⅱ类1分类患者前牙矫治过程中使用微种植体作支抗的效果研究[J].中国美容医学,2019,(11):96.
　[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(6):96.
[3]余赛男,李文慧,杨 攀.颧牙槽嵴区高位种植钉与高位头帽口外弓联合横腭杆矫治骨性Ⅱ类高角突型错牙合畸形疗效观察[J].中国美容医学,2020,(9):130.
　YU Sai-Nan,LI Wen-hui,YANG Pan.Appearance Efficacy of High-position Miniscrew in Zygomatic Alveolar Ridgeand High-position Headgear Facebow Combined with Transpalatal Arch in theCorrection and Treatment of Osseous Class Ⅱ High-angle Protrusion of Malocclusion[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2020,(6):130.
[4] 辛 策,宋 镇,纪彩娜,等. 颧牙种植钉和口外弓联合横腭杆治疗高角骨性Ⅱ类前突型错牙合畸形效果比较分析[J].中国美容医学,2021,(2):123.
　 XIN Ce,SONG Zhen,JI Cai-na,et al. Comparison of the Effect of Dental Implants, External Arch and Transverse Iliac Creston the Treatment of High Angle Skeletal Class Ⅱ Anterior Malformation[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2021,(6):123.
[5] 沈 悦,曾翠敏,刘明辉,等. 安氏Ⅱ类1分类错牙合畸形患者正畸前后CBCT测量值分析[J].中国美容医学,2021,(10):129.
　 SHEN Yue,ZENG Cui-min,LIU Ming-hui,et al. Analysis of CBCT Measurements before and after Orthodontic Correction in Patientswith Class Ⅱ Division 1 Malocclusion[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2021,(6):129.
[6]韩世智,黄 欢,蒙柯帆.微种植体支抗矫治错牙合畸形的美学效果及其对牙周炎症的影响[J].中国美容医学,2022,(2):134.
　HAN Shizhi,HUANG HuanMENG Kefan.Effect of Orthodontic Micro-implant Anchorage on Cosmetic Repair of Patients with Malocclusion and Its Effect on Periodontitis[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2022,(6):134.
[7]孟宪敏,邹佳静,王学玲,等.腭部微螺钉-横腭杆-摇椅弓支抗系统治疗上颌前突的临床研究[J].中国美容医学,2022,(6):98.
　MENG Xianmin,ZOU Jiajing,WANG Xueling,et al.Study on Palatal Miniimplant anchorage- Transpalatal arch-Reverse curve archwire System in Orthodontic Treatment of Maxillary Protrusion Patients[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2022,(6):98.
[8]郭陈琳,郑梦钰,胡耀政,等.正畸治疗中两种内收上前牙方式对牙齿及下颌骨垂直向位置的影响[J].中国美容医学,2023,(9):115.[doi:10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.005895]
　GUO Chenlin,ZHENG Mengyu,HU Yaozheng,et al.Vertical Position Changes of Teeth and Mandible Following Different Upper Incisors Retraction Techniques in Orthodontics Treatment[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2023,(6):115.[doi:10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.005895]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：2019年廊坊市科技支撑计划项目（编号：2019013136）
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-07-04