[1]钱佳丽,刘久利,何静岩,等.两种强脉冲光治疗红斑毛细血管扩张型玫瑰痤疮的效果对比[J].中国美容医学,2023,(7):110-113.[doi:10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.005763]
　QIAN Jiali,LIU Jiuli,HE Jingyan,et al.Comparison of Effects of Two Kinds of Intense Pulsed Lights in the Treatment of Erythema Telangiectatic Rosacea[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2023,(7):110-113.[doi:10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.005763]
点击复制

两种强脉冲光治疗红斑毛细血管扩张型玫瑰痤疮的效果对比()

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:
期数:
2023年7期
页码:
110-113
栏目:
出版日期:
2023-07-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of Effects of Two Kinds of Intense Pulsed Lights in the Treatment of Erythema Telangiectatic Rosacea
文章编号:
1008-6455（2023）07-0110-04
作者:
钱佳丽1 ; 刘久利1 ; 何静岩1 ; 王菲菲1 ; 曹 洋2
(1.北京中医医院顺义医院皮肤科 北京 101300;2.首都医科大学附属北京中医医院皮肤科 北京 100010)
Author(s):
QIAN Jiali1 ; LIU Jiuli1 ; HE Jingyan1 ; WANG Feifei1 ; CAO Yang2
(1.Department of Dermatology,Shunyi Hospital,Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Beijing 101300,China; 2.Department of Dermatology,Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100010,China)
关键词:
宽谱强脉冲光; 窄谱强脉冲光; 毛细血管扩张型; 玫瑰痤疮
Keywords:
optimal pulse technology-intense pulsed light;  dye pulsed light;  telangiectatic;  rosacea
分类号:
R758.73+ 4
DOI:
10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.005763
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：观察两种强脉冲光治疗红斑毛细血管扩张型玫瑰痤疮的效果对比。方法：回顾性分析2020年10月-2021年10月 笔者医院收治的86例红斑毛细血管扩张型玫瑰痤疮患者临床资料，根据患者治疗方法进行分组，将进行窄谱强脉冲光（Dye pulse light，DPL）治疗的患者纳入观察组（n=44），将进行宽谱强脉冲光（Optimal pulse technology-intense pulsed light，OPT-IPL）治疗的患者纳入对照组（n=42）。分析两组患者治疗前、治疗1次、治疗2次、治疗3次后面部改善情况[临 床红斑评定量表（Clinic erythema assessment，CEA）]、面部红斑分值（VISIA）差异，比较两组患者治疗1次、治疗2 次、治疗3次后皮损情况[医生整体评价法（Physician’s Global Assessment，PGA）]差异，探究两组患者治疗期间不良反 应差异。结果：治疗1次、治疗2次、治疗3次后两组患者CEA得分均较治疗前下降（P＜0.05），治疗3次后，观察组患者CEA 得分低于对照组（P＜0.05）；治疗1次、治疗2次、治疗3次后两组患者VISIA分值均较治疗前下降（P＜0.05），治疗2、3次 后，观察组患者VISIA分值均低于对照组（P＜0.05）；治疗2次、治疗3次后两组患者PGA评分均较治疗前上升（P＜0.05）， 且观察组患者PGA评分均高于对照组（P＜0.05）；治疗期间，观察组患者不良反应总发生率低于对照组（P＜0.05）。结 论：DPL治疗红斑毛细血管扩张型玫瑰痤疮效果优于OPT-IPL，且安全性更好。
Abstract:
Objective To observe the eff ects of two kinds of intense pulsed lights in the treatment of erythema telangiectatic rosacea. Methods The clinical data of 86 patients with erythema telangiectatic rosacea treated in the hospital were retrospectively analyzed between October 2020 and October 2021, and the patients were grouped according to the treatment methods. The patients undergoing dye pulsed light (DPL) were included in the observation group (n=44), and the patients treated with optimal pulse technology-intense pulsed light (OPT-IPL) were enrolled as the control group (n=42). The diff erences in facial improvement [Clinical Erythema Assessment (CEA)] and facial erythema score (VISIA) before treatment and after once, twice and three times treatments were analyzed in the two groups of patients. Diff erences in skin lesions [Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA)] of the two groups were compared after once, twice and three times treatment, and the diff erences in adverse reactions during treatment in the two groups were explored. Results The CEA scores in the two groups after once, twice and three times treatments were reduced compared to before treatment (P＜0.05), and the CEA score after three times treatment in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P＜0.05).The VISIA scores after once, twice, and three times treatments in the two groups were decreased compared with those before treatment (P＜0.05), and the VISIA scores in the observation group after twice and three times treatments were lower than those in the control group (P＜0.05). After twice and three times treatments, the PGA scores in both groups were enhanced compared with those before treatment (P＜0.05), and the PGA scores after twice and three times treatments in the observation group were higher compared to the control group (P＜0.05). During treatment, the total incidence rate of adverse reactions was lower in the observation group than that in the control group (P＜0.05). Conclusion DPL is more eff ective and safer than OPT-IPL in the treatment of erythema telangiectatic rosacea.

相似文献/References:

[1]周书帆,文丽萍,杜 宇. 超分子水杨酸联合窄谱强脉冲光治疗玫瑰痤疮临床疗效观察[J].中国美容医学,2019,(02):48.
　ZHOU Shu-fan,WEN Li-ping,DU Yu. Clinical Effect of Supramolecular Salicylic Acid Combined with Narrow-spectrumIntense Pulsed Light for Rosacea[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(7):48.
[2]施伟伟,花志祥,范向华,等. 窄谱强脉冲光治疗面部痤疮后红斑临床疗效探讨[J].中国美容医学,2019,(11):50.
　SHI Wei-wei,HUA Zhi-xiang,FAN Xiang-hua,et al. Study on the Clinical Efficacy of Narrow Spectrum Intense Pulsed Light in theTreatment of Erythema after Acne on the Face[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(7):50.
[3] 蒋亚楠,赵德梅,高 宇,等. 窄谱强脉冲光治疗早期颜面部创伤性瘢痕的疗效评价[J].中国美容医学,2021,(5):35.
　 JIANG Ya-nan,ZHAO De-mei,GAO Yu,et al. Evaluation of Narrow-spectrum Intense Pulsed Light in the Treatment of Early FacialTraumatic Scar[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2021,(7):35.
[4]周 晴,汪 文,是 娴,等.中药凉血清热方联合窄谱强脉冲光治疗痤疮后红斑临床研究?/html>[J].中国美容医学,2021,(11):114.
　ZHOU Qing,WANG Wen,SHI Xian,et al.A Clinical Study on Liangxue Qingre Decoction Combined with Narrow-spectrum Intense Pulsed Light in the Treatment of Erythema after Acne?/html>[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2021,(7):114.
[5]杨 帅,蒋小姣,马海燕.超脉冲点阵CO2激光联合窄谱强脉冲光治疗创伤后早期增生性瘢痕效果分析[J].中国美容医学,2022,(2):58.
　YANG Shuai,JIANG Xiaojiao,MA Haiyan.Effect Analysis of Early Treatment of Post-traumatic Hypertrophic Scar with Ultra-pulsed Fractional CO2 Laser Combined with Dye Pulse Light[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2022,(7):58.
[6]吴秀娟,王胜东,徐 慧,等.宽谱强脉冲光(BBL)联合盐酸米诺环素和含青刺果油屏障修复霜治疗玫瑰痤疮[J].中国美容医学,2023,(8):92.[doi:10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.005832]
　WU Xiujuan,WANG Shendong,et al.Clinical Effi cacy of Minocycline Hydrochloride and Skin Barrier Repair Cream Containing Prinsepia Utilis Royle Oil Combined with Broad Band Light in the Treatment of Rosacea[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2023,(7):92.[doi:10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.005832]

更新日期/Last Update: 2023-08-08