[1]丛 林,廖 勇,杨蓉娅. 贻贝粘蛋白喷剂对面部敏感性皮肤瘙痒症状的缓解作用[J].中国美容医学,2019,(08):40-42.
　CONG Lin,LIAO Yong,YANG Rong-ya. Relieving Effect of Mussel Adhesive Protein Spray on the Pruritus Symptoms of Facial Sensitive Skin[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(08):40-42.
点击复制

 贻贝粘蛋白喷剂对面部敏感性皮肤瘙痒症状的缓解作用
()
分享到：

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:
期数:
2019年08期
页码:
40-42
栏目:
出版日期:
2019-08-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Relieving Effect of Mussel Adhesive Protein Spray on the Pruritus Symptoms of Facial Sensitive Skin
文章编号:
1008-6455（2019）08-0040-03
作者:
丛 林; 廖 勇; 杨蓉娅
Author(s):
CONG Lin; LIAO Yong; YANG Rong-ya
关键词:
[关键词]敏感性皮肤; 面部; 瘙痒; 贻贝粘蛋白; 效果; 耐受性
Keywords:
Key words: sensitive skin;  face;  pruritus;  mussel adhesive protein;  effect;  tolerance
分类号:
R751.05
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
[摘要]目的：评价贻贝粘蛋白喷剂对面部敏感性皮肤瘙痒症状的缓解作用。方法：将60例面部敏感性皮肤患者随机分为对
照组和观察组，每组30例。对照组和观察组分别外用0.9%生理盐水和贻贝粘蛋白喷剂，治疗后24h进行瘙痒视觉模拟量表
(VAS)评分，比较两组瘙痒程度、止痒有效率及止痒起效时间、止痒持续时间。治疗结束后评估患者对贻贝粘蛋白喷剂的耐
受性。结果：观察组患者治疗后24h的瘙痒VAS评分降低至(3.22±0.13)，与治疗前比较有统计学差异(P ＜0.05)。对照组
患者治疗后24h的瘙痒VAS评分降低至(8.36±0.28)，与治疗前比较无统计学差异(P ＞0.05)。观察组治疗后24h的瘙痒VAS
评分(3.22±0.13)与对照组(8.36±0.28)比较有统计学差异(P ＜0.05)。观察组瘙痒的止痒有效率为（73.3%），对照组的
止痒有效率为（36.7%）。观察组止痒有效率明显高于对照组，差异有统计学意义(P ＜0.05)。观察组患者止痒起效时间为
（5.17±0.81）min，对照组患者止痒起效时间为（6.25±0.56）min，两组比较无统计学意义(P ＞0.05)。观察组患者止痒
持续时间为（12.37±1.21）h，对照组患者止痒持续时间为（1.58±0.46）h，两组比较有统计学意义(P ＜0.05)。99%的患
者对贻贝粘蛋白喷剂耐受性良好。结论：贻贝粘蛋白喷剂可有效缓解面部敏感性皮肤的瘙痒症状，且止痒持续时间长，耐受
性良好。
Abstract:

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the relieving effect of mussel adhesive protein spray on the pruritus symptoms of facial
sensitive skin. Methods Total 60 cases with facial sensitive skin were randomly divided into control group and observation
group, 30 cases in each group. The control group and the observation group were treated with 0.9% saline and mussel adhesive
protein spray respectively. The pruritus visual analog scales(VAS) before and 24h after treatment were assessed. The degree of
pruritus, the effective rate of antipruritus, the onset time and the duration of antipruritic effect were compared between groups.
The tolerance of patients to mussel adhesive protein spray was evaluated after treatment. Results The VAS score of pruritus
in the observation group decreased to (3.22±0.13) 24 hours after treatment, which was significantly different from that before
treatment (P ＜0.05). The VAS score in the control group was reduced to 8.36±0.28 24h after treatment (P ＞0.05). The effective
rate of antipruritic was 73.3% in the observation group and 36.7% in the control group. The effective rate of antipruritic in
the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P ＜0.05). The antipruritic onset time of the
patients in the observation group was (5.17±0.81) min, and that of the patients in the control group was (6.25±0.56) min, with
no significant difference between the two groups (P ＞0.05). The duration of antipruritic treatment in the observation group
was (12.37±1.21) h, while that in the control group was (1.58±0.46) h. There was statistical significance between the two
groups (P ＜0.05). The tolerance was judged to be very good for the large majority of the patients. Conclusion Mussel adhesive
protein spray can effectively relieve pruritus symptoms of facial sensitive skin, and has a long antipruritic duration and good tolerance.

相似文献/References:

[1]倪晓静,王 坤. “风筝”皮瓣修复面部皮肤缺损的临床应用[J].中国美容医学,2018,(04):27.
　NI Xiao-jing,WANG Kun. Clinical Application of Kite Flap to Repair Facial Skin Defect[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(08):27.
[2]邱 阳,李思彤. 光电协同技术联合短波治疗面部敏感性肌肤临床观察[J].中国美容医学,2018,(04):58.
　QIU Yang,LI Si-tong. Clinical Observation of Photoelectric Synergy Technology Combined with Short Wave Treatment Facial Sensitive Skin[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(08):58.
[3]姚晓东,吴晓琰,崔晓美,等. 双极射频联合左旋维生素C治疗面部皮肤光老化疗效观察[J].中国美容医学,2018,(07):94.
　YAO Xiao-dong,WU Xiao-yan,CUI Xiao-mei,et al. The Clinical Survey of Bipolar Radiofrequency Combined with L-vitamin C in the Treatment of Facial Skin Photoaging[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(08):94.
[4]文丽萍,周书帆,邓 映,等. 短波理疗联合强脉冲光治疗面部糖皮质激素依赖性皮炎临床观察[J].中国美容医学,2018,(11):36.
　WEN Li-ping,ZHOU Shu-fan,DENG Ying,et al. Clinical Observation of Desensitization Apparatus Combined with Intense PulsedLight in the Treatment of Facial Glucocorticosteroid-dependent Dermatitis[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(08):36.
[5]华若岳. 重组人表皮生长因子在面部深Ⅱ度烧伤创面修复中的应用研究[J].中国美容医学,2019,(02):36.
　HUA Ruo-yue. Application of rhEGF in the Process of Facial Deep Second Degree Burn Wound Repair[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(08):36.
[6]陈 燕,李 生,马 明. 强脉冲光联合长脉宽Nd:YAG激光治疗面部毛细血管扩张症疗效观察[J].中国美容医学,2019,(03):54.
　CHEN Yan,LI Sheng,MA Ming. Therapeutic Effect of Intense Pulsed Light Combined with Long Pulse Width Nd:YAGLaser on Facial Telangiectasia[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(08):54.
[7]战大川,赵月荣,赵振德,等. bFGF联合自体脂肪移植在面部凹陷性瘢痕治疗中的美容价值研究[J].中国美容医学,2019,(04):116.
　ZHAN Da-chuan,ZHAO Yue-rong,ZHAO Zhen-de,et al. Study on the Cosmetic Value of bFGF Combined with Autologous Fat Transplantationin the Treatment of Facial Depressed Scar[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(08):116.
[8]何航远,赵小瑜,韩 未,等. 面部皮脂腺囊肿小切口摘除术的诊疗探讨[J].中国美容医学,2019,(04):128.
　HE Hang-yuan,ZHAO Xiao-yu,HAN Wei,et al. Experience in Treatment of Facial Sebaceous Cyst with Small Incision Surgery[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(08):128.
[9]刘芃祥,王文娟,郝永红,等. 皮肤镜在面部光线性角化病诊断中的应用研究[J].中国美容医学,2019,(05):50.
　LIU Peng-xiang,WANG Wen-juan,HAO Yong-hong,et al. Application of Dermoscopy in the Diagnosis of Facial Actinic Keratosis[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(08):50.
[10]陈永平,王金河. 点阵铒激光联合羟基乙酸治疗面部痤疮瘢痕临床观察[J].中国美容医学,2019,(06):56.
　CHEN Yong-ping,WANG Jin-he. Clinical Efficacy of Combined Lattice Erbium Laser with Glycolic Acid Treatment of Facial Acne Scar[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(08):56.
[11]丛 林,杨蓉娅. 贻贝提取物护理软膏治疗面部敏感性皮肤疗效观察[J].中国美容医学,2019,(05):47.
　CONG Lin,YANG Rong-ya. Clinical Efficacy of Mussel Adhesive Protein Extractive Ointment on Facial Sensitive Skin[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2019,(08):47.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-08-28