[1]卿 凤,郑宇祥.微种植体支抗与J钩支抗在双颌前突患者系统矫治中的效果比较[J].中国美容医学,2024,(1):63-66.[doi:10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.006095]
　QING Feng,ZHENG Yuxiang.Comparison of the Effi cacy of Micrograft Anchorage and J-hook Anchorage in Systematic Correction of Patients with Bimaxillary Protrusion[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2024,(1):63-66.[doi:10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.006095]
点击复制

微种植体支抗与J钩支抗在双颌前突患者系统矫治中的效果比较()
分享到：

《中国美容医学》[ISSN:1008-6445/CN:61-1347/R]

卷:
期数:
2024年1期
页码:
63-66
栏目:
出版日期:
2024-01-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of the Effi cacy of Micrograft Anchorage and J-hook Anchorage in Systematic Correction of Patients with Bimaxillary Protrusion
文章编号:
1008-6455（2024）01-0063-04
作者:
卿 凤1 ; 郑宇祥2
(1.绵阳市第三人民医院·四川省精神卫生中心口腔科 四川 绵阳 621000 ;2.绵阳市中心医院口腔正畸科 四川 绵阳 621099 )
Author(s):
QING Feng1 ; ZHENG Yuxiang2
(1.Department of Stomatology,the Third People’s Hospital of Mianyang City,Sichuan Mental Health Center,Mianyang 621000,Sichuan,China; 2.Department of Orthodontics,Mianyang Central Hospital,Mianyang 621099,Sichuan,China)
关键词:
微种植体支抗; J钩支抗; 双颌前突; 系统矫正治疗; 并发症; 头影测量值
Keywords:
microimplant anchorage;  J-hook anchorage;  bimaxillary protrusion;  systemic corrective treatmente;  complication;  cephalometric measurements
分类号:
R783.4
DOI:
10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.006095
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：比较微种植体支抗与J钩支抗在双颌前突患者系统矫治中的效果。方法：选取笔者医院2019年5月-2021年5月收 治的80例双颌前突患者为研究对象，按随机数字法分为研究组（40例，采用微种植体支抗治疗）和对照组（40例，采用J钩 支抗治疗）。记录两组临床疗效、治疗时间、头影测量值相关指标及并发症发生率。结果：治疗后，研究组有效率高于对照 组，治疗时间短于对照组，研究组面凸角（G-Sn-Pg’）、鼻唇角（Cm-Sn-UL）大于对照组，下唇-E线间距（Li-E）、上中切 牙长轴和NA连线交角（U1-NA）、上中切牙长轴和前颅底平面交角（U1-SN）、下中切牙-下颌平面角（IMPA）、下中切牙长 轴和NA连线交角（L1-NB）低于对照组（均P＜0.05）。两组并发症发生率比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论：在 双颌前突患者系统矫治中，微种植体支抗相较J钩支抗可提高疗效，缩短治疗时间，改善面部状况，安全可靠。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the effi cacy of micro-implant anchorage and J hook anchorage in the systemic correction of bimaxillary protrusion. Methods Eighty patients with bimaxillary protrusion admitted to our hospital from May 2019 to May 2021 were selected and divided into a study group (40 cases) and a control group (40 cases). The control group was treated with J hook anchorage, and the study group was treated with micro-implant anchorage. Record the clinical effi cacy, treatment time, cephalometric measurements and the incidence of complications of the two groups. Results After treatment, the eff ective rate of the study group was higher than that of the control group, and the treatment time was shorter than that of the control group. The face convex angle (G-Sn-Pg ’) and nasolabial angle (Cm-Sn-UL) of the study group were larger than those of the control group. The distance between the lower lip E lines (Li-E), the intersection angle between the long axis of the upper central incisor and the NA line (U1-NA), the intersection angle between the long axis of the upper central incisor and the anterior skull base plane (U1-SN), the angle between the lower central incisor and the mandibular plane (IMPA), the intersection angle between the long axis of the lower central incisor and the NA line (L1-NB) were lower than those of the control group (all P＜0.05). There was no signifi cant diff erence in complication rate between the two groups (P ＞0.05). Conclusion Compared with J-hook anchorage, micro-implant anchorage can improve the therapeutic eff ect, shorten the treatment time and improve the facial condition in the systematic correction treatment of patients with bimaxillary protrusion, which is safe and reliable.

相似文献/References:

[1]封颖丽,任亚男,高锦瑜,等. 无托槽隐形联合固定矫治成人骨性Ⅲ类错牙合一例[J].中国美容医学,2018,(11):75.
　FENG Ying-li,REN Ya-nan,GAO Jin-yu,et al. Treatment for Adult Skeletal Class Ⅲ Malocclusion Combined Invisible Aligner and Fixed Appliance[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2018,(1):75.
[2] 高玉丽,郝学丽. 微种植体支抗治疗对正畸患者牙周状况及美观程度的影响[J].中国美容医学,2021,(9):132.
　GAO Yu-li,HAO Xue-li. Effects of Micro-screw Implant Anchorage on Root Resorption Status, ChewingFunction and Aesthetic Degree of Patients with Orthodontics[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2021,(1):132.
[3] 陈绪道. 微种植体支抗推磨牙远中移动的临床研究[J].中国美容医学,2021,(10):157.
　 CHEN Xu-dao. Clinical Study on Micro-Implant Anchorage for Molar Distalization[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2021,(1):157.
[4]李世彦,鲁晓红,梁建晖.两种正畸矫治器联合微种植体支抗对先天性缺牙患者美观及咬合功能恢复的比较[J].中国美容医学,2022,(2):138.
　LI Shiyan,LU Xiaohong,LIANG Jianhui.Comparison of Two Orthodontic Appliances Combined with Micro-implant Anchorage in the Recovery of Aesthetics and Occlusal Function in Patients with Congenital Missing Teeth[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2022,(1):138.
[5]张依鸣 综述,张 勤 审校.微种植体支抗压低上前牙的研究进展[J].中国美容医学,2022,(3):185.
　ZHANG Yiming,ZHANG Qin.Research Progress of Mini-implant Anchorage in the Maxillary Anterior Teeth Intrusion[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2022,(1):185.
[6]吴绍旋,赵云霞,沈家安,等.微种植体支抗在口腔正畸应用中的临床效果研究[J].中国美容医学,2022,(4):137.
　WU Shaoxuan,ZHAO Yunxia,SHEN Jiaan,et al.Study on the Application of Microscrew Implant Anchorage and External Arch Reinforcement Anchorage in Orthodontic Treatment[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2022,(1):137.
[7]徐卫华,臧 悦,王洪伟.微种植体支抗与口外弓支抗在口腔正畸治疗中的疗效对比研究[J].中国美容医学,2022,(5):126.
　XU Weihua,ZANG Yue,WANG Hongwei.Comparative Study of Micro-implant Anchorage and External Arch Anchorage in Orthodontic Treatment[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2022,(1):126.
[8]郑雅心,何 洁,张俊杰,等.微种植体支抗整体远移上牙列对上气道影响的三维分析[J].中国美容医学,2022,(8):125.
　ZHENG Yaxin,HE Jie,ZHANG Junjie,et al.Three-dimensional Analysis of Upper Airway before and after the Maxillary Dentition Distalization with Microimplant[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2022,(1):125.
[9]李月明.微种植体支抗联合MBT矫治技术在青少年骨性Ⅱ类1分类患者中的应用[J].中国美容医学,2022,(12):160.
　LI Yueming.Application Value of Screw Implant Anchorage Combined with MBT Correction Technique on Adolescent Skeletal Class Division 1 Cases[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2022,(1):160.
[10]童 琳,高 蕾,吴松松,等.腭侧与颊侧微种植体支抗远移上颌磨牙的临床疗效及对侧貌美学效果的影响研究[J].中国美容医学,2023,(1):145.
　TONG lin,GAO Lei,WU Songsong,et al.Effect of the Clinical Effect and Aesthetics of Lateral Appearance on Palatal and Buccal Implantation of Microimplant Anchorage of Maxillary Molars[J].Medical Aesthetics and Beauty,2023,(1):145.

更新日期/Last Update: 2024-01-24